Netbooks May Face Fatal Identity Crisis in 2010
Netbooks and internet-hungry consumers began romancing each other in 2007. They cemented their relationship this year and set off on their honeymoon. In fact, most of this year has been like a honeymoon for netbooks. But the thing that makes a honeymoon all the more special is that it only occurs once in a lifetime and almost always seems to end abruptly. Some industry analysts prognosticate the end of the honeymoon period in 2010.
They feel that netbooks will again be haunted by the same identity crisis that was born with them but was overshadowed by consumer enthusiasm. But it is a question that will be hard to ignore in the new year if prices continue to rise. Some netbooks are priced perilously close to entry-level laptops much more powerful than them. Besides, most users have become used to a more exciting brand of internet than the one netbooks offer.
"It's the internet's fault for making us much more multimedia savvy," Stuart Miles, founder and editor of technology blog Pocket Lint, told BBC News. "Technology has advanced so much that it's outmanoeuvred itself. You wouldn't go for something so basic anymore."
Netbooks may come under heavy pressure from the upcoming deluge of tablets and smartphones built to provide PC-like browsing, according to a BBC report. There are many different form factors being thrown around, to the extent that it has become difficult for consumers to choose among them. But Arm spokesperson Ian Drew believes that various device types will have to eventually coexist. "It will be a lot of different machines for a lot of different people," he told BBC News.

![]()
MleB
December 29, 2009 at 12:33pm
If there is a crisis of confidence in the product and an identity crisis as to what makes a netbook, the fault must be squarely be put down to the manufacturers - and most especially ASUS, who almost single-handedly created the niche and market.
Their original 'netbook'. the EeePC 701 4G hit a sweet-spot of size, price and capabilities - capabilities that even ASUS seemed blithely unaware of, leaving it to the user-base to make the device the success it became. Forget just basic web-browsing and email - with the right tweaks, users were discovering the full, lite abilities of this sub-computer. And in doing so, were writing screenplays, creating programs, doing photo manipulation and a multitude of other projects.
But then. ASUS seemed to lose their way - producing (almost weekly, it seemed) yet another incremental variation of the device - confusing the consumer market, watering down the product and eventually losing the marketshare that they once entirely owned to other manufacturers as they came onboard.
Some, like Acer, tried to remain with the original concept - low price, small and capable while others, like HP and Toshiba, initially went for the more expensive 'business' market. Suddenly a simple, small, inexpensive device was transforming into something larger and decidely often not simple, small and inexpensive - instaed becoming an underpowered notebook with iffy graphics. And the identity crisis had begun.
Perhaps the fault lies with the manufacturers listening to the consumer. Rather than, as ASUS did, presenting us with a device as a finished product, they've taken to listening to what consumers 'want' in a netbook - so we get a device conceived by committee and priced by manufacturers who don't want to cut into their dwindling 'real' computer market.
If the Apple 'tablet' ever does become more than etherware, Apple will do what they always do. Present the product as done and say, "If you don't like it, your're wrong" - and Macoytles will clamber over each other to get it and wax poetical about it, regardless of shortcomings.
Pity other manufacturers don't have such chutzpah or fan base.















