MSI Calls Shenanigans on Gigabyte's PCI-E Gen 3 Ready Claims
Through a series of BIOS updates, Gigabyte last month announced it added native support for PCI Express Gen. 3 technology on over 40 of its existing motherboards, and along with support for Intel's 22nm Ivy Bridge processors, it was a solid announcement for system builders looking to future proof. At least it should have been, only MSI is taking Gigabyte to task over its PCI-E Gen. 3 claims.
This isn't some off-the-cuff remark being blown out of proportion by the media, either. MSI put together a multi-page PDF document filled with marketing slides explaining exactly why it thinks Gigabyte is misleading customers with its "Fake 'Gen 3' series."
In order to take advantage of PCI-E Gen. 3, MSI argues motherboard makers need to equip their boards with compliant hardware, including Gen. 3 switch chips, capacitors, and resistors, as well as offer up the right amount of voltage via the BIOS. According to MSI, nearly all of Gigabyte's Gen. 3 ready boards aren't equipped with the right parts, and of course MSI touts its own Gen. 3 boards as being fully compliant.
Much ado about nothing? Not according to MSI's internal testing. The slides go on to show what happens when you pop a 22nm Ivy Bridge chip into Gigabyte's P67A-UD4-B3 motherboard, one of the many models listed as Gen. 3 ready. Unlike MSI's Z68-GD65 (G3) motherboard, Gigabyte's board dropped down to Gen. 1 x8. According to MSI, only one of Gigabyte's Gen. 3 ready motherboards is compliant with the next-generation specification, and that's the G1.Sniper 2.
"All other boards? No Gen. 3 support!," MSI emphatically concludes, with a 'fail' graphic displaying a pile of Gigabyte motherboards.
You can view the entire PDF here.
Image Credit: Gigabyte
Comments
Comments are closed on this article
![]()
Neel Chauhan
September 08, 2011 at 9:26am
Gigabyte will fail. They make flase claims like this one and will go down one day unless you make gigabyte stop making false claims and living on the old school BIOS instead of the modern EFI. If you fail at that then make Apple outsource manufacturing their ipads and macs and iphones to gigabyte instead of foxconn.
![]()
h e x e n
September 08, 2011 at 5:51am
Gigabyte is crap anyway. Six years ago I purchased two Gigabyte boards and both bit the dust about a year and a half in. They are the only boards I have owned that have just completely stopped working one day, not related to user error. I still have a six year old Chaintech VNF4 Ultra board that works and which cost less.
MSI, ASUS and Foxconn ftw.
![]()
Recidivist
September 08, 2011 at 2:58pm
Stop throwing your motherboards around then. I've owned lots of Gigabyte stuff, not a single one has died (3 years+).
![]()
pastorbob
September 08, 2011 at 4:49am
Deceptions such as this can get a company into major hot water with the FTC and other federal agenices. But then again it sounds like business as usual in the good ol' USA.
![]()
Eoraptor
September 08, 2011 at 2:10pm
No kidding... I remember when 4G mean a revolutionary standard ten times faster than 3g in Cellular communications, a documented set of standards and practices. Now it's "whatever the fark we say it means."
Apparently the PCIe Spec is headed in the same direction. What next? sticking a blue plastic tongue into a USB port and therefore declaring it to be USB3?
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.


















