Microsoft on Patents: Can't We All Just Get Along?
Would you have guessed that it would be Microsoft who stands up and yells, "Enough already!," in response to all the silly patent squabbles, many of which only end up hurting the consumer? Believe it or not, that's what the Redmond software giant did, in a roundabout sort of way. Microsoft is taking a public stand in support for industry standards and vowed it would not seek injunctions against any firm that runs afoul of so-called "standard essential" patents, all for the greater good of mankind.
"Industry standards are vitally important to the development of the Internet and to interoperability among mobile devices and other computers," Microsoft said in a blog post. "The international standards system works well because firms that contribute to standards promise to make their essential patents available to others on fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory terms. Consumers and the entire industry will suffer if, in disregard of this promise, firms seek to block others from shipping products on the basis of such standard essential patents."
Microsoft made four promises related to its above stance. For starters, Microsoft said it will make its standard essential patents available to all, "on fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory terms" (No. 1). As mentioned, Microsoft vowed not to seek injunctions against those who use said patents (No. 2), nor will it play hardball by only licensing standard essential patents to other firms if they license their patents back to Microsoft (No. 3). Finally, Microsoft said it will only transfer standard essential patents to firms that agree with its above points (No. 4).
That's the short and sweet of it. A far lengthier explanation is found in a related corporate blog post in which Microsoft goes into more detail about standard essential patents and why they're so important to the industry and to consumers.
Comments
Comments are closed on this article
![]()
HRO
February 09, 2012 at 8:02pm
Somehow, the first time I read "standard essential patents available to all, on fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory terms" I found "price" lurking. well... must be me.
Will Microsoft being "fair and reasonable" include stopping bleeding the Android market by collecting their licence royalties? I guess that is not what being "fair and reasonable" meant.
• HRO •
![]()
Penterax
February 12, 2012 at 10:16pm
Bleeding?
Microsoft's position was that Android used some of MS's technology. Apparently, Samsung agreed enough to pay MS licensing fees for that technology. Excuse them for wanting to make money on their own hard work!
Microsoft never filed to have Android phone sales stopped - Apple has.
![]()
Engelsstaub
February 09, 2012 at 7:04pm
I've criticized Microsoft here in the past; especially in relation to their claims of Linux "infringing" on their patents. I'm just going to admit that they're being somewhat decent otherwise. It's pretty hard for corporations like MS, Apple, and Google not to step on each other's toes a bit. I wish they would all just play to their own strengths and stop litigating (and, in some cases, blatantly infringing.) My interest, as a consumer, is that I use and like products from each of these companies.
![]()
cpuking2010
February 09, 2012 at 4:10pm
Awe did little micro$oft get scared of the patent portfolio that Google just bought? Guess what, Karma is a Bitch!
![]()
someuid
February 09, 2012 at 11:06am
Ha. This is funny coming from Microsoft, especially when they make such a big fuss when some company signs a 'no sue for Linux' contract with Microsoft.
![]()
TRYER
February 19, 2012 at 4:37pm
It's like some company putting a patent on Ketchup or trying to patent a word people use daily. Silly but they are both essential.
![]()
Bullwinkle J Moose
February 09, 2012 at 9:01am
Well, I was hoping that MICROSOFT SECURITY ESSENTIALS ability to send data to and from ANY PERSONS Windows Computer "WHILE" All software was BLOCKED from doing this in the users Firewall would be covered under such a Patent Agreement
However,
Since Windows is a Spyware Platform used by the Gov't, it doesn't appear to be a function that Microsoft considers "Essential" or "Patentable" for others to use but rather "Essential" yet "Classified" for Internal and Gov't use Only!
Maybe Maximum Propaganda or the Non-Believers out there can verify what I just said by blocking ALL traffic in their firewall and then updating Security Essentials over the Internet
(I used a "Registered" copy of XP-SP3 with all the Microsoft Critical Spyware Updates for this test)
Once you have verified that Microsoft is sending data to and from your computer without authorization, ask yourself the following question>
NOW who's wearing the Tinfoil Hat?
![]()
Cregan89
February 09, 2012 at 8:13pm
Microsoft Security Essentials controls the Windows Firewall when installed, so colour me not surprised that MSE doesn't block itself from updating itself. Use a third party firewall and I guarantee you that it will block MSE updates.
And you've still yet to explain to me how ANY software, including MS Windows, could possibly get by a hardware firewall? I'm all ears...
![]()
Bullwinkle J Moose
February 09, 2012 at 11:13pm
I used Sygate Pro firewall which blocks both incoming and outgoing data from anything including Microsoft's core functions (features) except when certain items are changed
For example,
I noticed security software began breaking the firewall when AVG went from version 7.0 to version 8.0
In AVG 7.0 the firewall worked fine!
But, once you update to version 8, programs, keyloggers, trojans and virtually anything else you could think of began accessing the Internet directly even though EVERYTHING was blocked in the firewallIn AVG version 9, they fixed the antivirus to prevent the end user from seeing that programs were actually connecting to the Internet when blocked in the firewall but you can see that they were still disabling the firewall by reading the license in AVG 9
This was the beginning of logging what programs were running on a users machine without the user being aware of it
This stealth behavior was expanded upon with Microsoft service pack 3 and later updates
This same behavior is seen with security essentials yet the firewall gives you no warning because the program updates fine while everything is blocked from Internet access and no firewall warning popup occurs with security essentials when it begins updating
Others here will complain that Sygate was a security risk and should be updated to a more secure firewall, yet when you do that you will not see what is connecting to the Internet in the background
I believe the updated firewalls were merely to prevent the end user from seeing what was connecting to the Internet when EVERYTHING is blocked in your firewall
At least with Sygate, we can see what they are doing!
For those who go the packet sniffer route...
I don't care what your packet sniffer says!
If the Light on my wireless dongle is blinking, data is being sent!
With SP2 or AVG 7 and earlier, the light diddn't blink when everything was blocked in the firewall!With SP3, AVG 8 and later or Security Essentials installed, the light blinks regardless of what I block in the firewall BECAUSE DATA IS BEING SENT!
Welcome to HELL!
![]()
LatiosXT
February 09, 2012 at 9:14am
I'm pretty sure in the EULA it said they were going to send data off. And there's privacy policies.
So either you're trolling, you're just a stupid kid.
![]()
Bullwinkle J Moose
February 09, 2012 at 1:51pm
"pretty Sure" doesn't cut it around here kid!
YOU might not think it's suspicious to just send data off to the Internet, but to do so even though your Firewall has blocked ALL programs from sending or receiving data to/from the Internet is a prime indicator of a backdoor
To do so without the firewall even giving you a popup is a DEFINITE indicator to a back door
To call others stupid or a troll without understanding the consequences of the actions just described is usually an indicator that you are an insider trying to protect your illegal spyware operation
However, in aprox 2 out of 10 cases, the person making such a retarded statement as you have just made indicates that you are lacking intelligence and are the type of person who goes around the Internet making retarded statements like you just did without ever once checking whether I was offering proof of my claim by checking what I said for yourself on your own computer
I'll give you the benefit of the doub't in this case untill you check my findings for yourself
Please verify what I said in my original post and refrain from reposting untill you understand the consequences of what it means to have a back door "in" and out of any Windows computer without consent and without being notified by a firewall
However,
If you continue to make statements like you just did, I will no longer give you the benefit of the doubt!Have a nice day :)
![]()
Bullwinkle J Moose
February 09, 2012 at 2:11pm
Really?
R E A L L Y ?
Do these people REALLY think its a great idea to have Microsoft or the Gov't sending and receiving data from their computers without having the ability to block that transfer in the firewall
Or letting Microsoft and the Gov't send and receive data from their computers without being notified by their firewall that it's even happening?
Once again for the Noobs....
Download a fresh copy of MS security essentials, then block ALL programs from accessing the Internet
Now download all the updates while EVERYTHING is blocked from Internet access!
Explain why you think we should trust anyone like that...
and please tell us why YOU would trust them...
I've GOT to hear this!
![]()
cpuking2010
February 09, 2012 at 4:13pm
QUIT PIRATING AND OR COMMITTING ILLEGAL ACTS, ON YOUR COMPUTER! Do this and you'll have nothing to worry about.
![]()
Bullwinkle J Moose
February 09, 2012 at 10:46pm
QUIT PIRATING AND OR COMMITTING ILLEGAL ACTS, ON YOUR COMPUTER ?
What does that have do do with an Illegal and global spyware operation on EVERYONES computer?
Are you a party to the Illegal Global spyware operation to know what I'm doing or are you just talking shit?
Let's ask ANONYMOUS
![]()
Bullwinkle J Moose
February 09, 2012 at 2:31pm
Good one
But how do you secure your computer?
More Meds or A Bigger Hat?
![]()
Hey.That_Dude
February 09, 2012 at 3:26pm
those of us with significant security issues normally do the most secure thing you can do with a PC.
It's called "unplug". I know it's a strange and foreign concept, but stay with me for part two.still there, GREAT!
part 2: linux/Unix, free.
nuf said.
![]()
Carlidan
February 09, 2012 at 6:30pm
Best advice to give a paranoid person. :)
But how about those magnetic waves they are sending to your brain!
![]()
chart2006
February 09, 2012 at 8:49am
Can we say Rambus!!! It would be nice to see more standardization but unlikely it will be adopted industry wide. We can hope right!?
![]()
chronium
February 09, 2012 at 8:46am
I wonder if its possible to sue the patent office under the grounds of gross negligence or something. One for a publicity stunt but also to try and force changes in the rules so stupid patents aren't possible to make anymore.
![]()
LatiosXT
February 09, 2012 at 9:16am
The problem with the patent office (if I heard correctly) is that they stopped receiving government funding... so they came up with asinine ways to get more patents in. More patents = fees.
![]()
Jaeger_CDN
February 09, 2012 at 8:33am
This whole global patent/injunction thing has really gotten out of hand.
It's to the point where I'll stop buying products from companies that insist on playing that game.
![]()
Zoandar
February 09, 2012 at 9:02am
Should be easy to do, since most of today's products come from China, where patents are a big joke.
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.
















