Microsoft Loses Appeal in Word Patent Case
The litigation gods don't seem to be favoring Microsoft at the moment. A U.S court of appeals dashed all its hopes of a turnaround in its legal battle with Canadian firm i4i when it upheld a previous ruling against the Redmond-based company on Tuesday. In August, a U.S District Judge had ruled that certain versions of Microsoft Word encroach upon i4i's patents and consequently slapped the software giant with a $290 million fine, besides placing an injunction on the sale of all infringing versions of Word in the U.S.
The appeals court had stayed the injunction in September until the matter was in consideration. But now that it has affirmed the previous ruling against Microsoft, there is very little the company can do apart from purging Word 2007 and Office 2007 of the features that violate i4i's patents. According to a Reuters report, the company is already taking the necessary corrective measures.
However, the company is also exploring other legal options, including a rehearing by a full panel of judges or a Supreme Court review, according to its spokesperson Kevin Kutz. A spokesperson for i4i said it is “pleased with the court's decision to uphold the injunction, an important step in protecting the property rights of small inventors.” This small inventor with a vindictive name certainly has every reason to be pleased.

![]()
SmokinIndo
December 23, 2009 at 11:57am
Law is Law and MS is getting raped from all sides right now LOL.
![]()
captrespect
December 23, 2009 at 9:39am
If I'm reading this correctly (and I'm probably not). This company got a patent on the ability to save a document using "metacodes" and then have map to between the metacodes and content. So you can change the structure of a document without changing the content. The patent isn't specifiy to xml, but they go after word due to how doc is saved as xml. It's crazy stupid how broad this patent is. They could probably apply it to peoples use of CSS and HTML or anything else.
![]()
Taz0
December 23, 2009 at 11:11am
Software patents are crazy stupid in general. Patents are supposed to protect inventions - actual concrete designs or implementation of a new concept - not the concept itself. You can't patent ideas. The problem with software is that there is little or no separation between the idea and its patentable method of application. Software is in fact a formal way to express an idea, and that's what these companies are trying to own - an idea.
If they had patented a concrete way or method to change the structure of a document without changing the content, then it would be a different story, but they're trying to own the very concept, as with most, if not all, software patents.
![]()
Carpnter
December 23, 2009 at 1:52pm
It does not appear that they actually created anything but instead are playing the patent lottery hoping to hit it big.















