Microsoft to Intel: You're Wrong about Windows 8
Intel senior VP Renee James may have rode into town a little high on her horse yesterday when she revealed details about Windows 8, details that were apparently "misleading." James spoke of there being multiple versions of Windows 8, four of which will be aimed at ARM. According to James, ARM, unlike Intel, will not be able to run legacy apps. Microsoft's response? Shut your face, Intel (we're paraphrasing).
According to James, Microsoft plans to release a traditional version of Windows 8 designed to run on x86 platforms. This version will come with a Windows 7 mode to ensure backwards compatibility with legacy apps. But on the ARM platform, James said each of the four Windows SKUs will be aimed at specific ARM SoCs, none of whch will be forward or backward compatible, or even compatible across different vendors.
Her comments prompted Microsoft to step in and defend its new BFF, who according to Business Insider had this to say:
"Intel’s statements during yesterday’s Intel Investor Meeting about Microsoft’s plans for the next version of Windows were factually inaccurate and unfortunately misleading. From the first demonstrations of Windows on SoC, we have been clear about our goals and have emphasized that we are at the technology demonstration stage. As such, we have no further details or information at this time."
Curiously missing from Microsoft's rebuttal is an explanation of which comments it found misleading, whether it was the bit about legacy apps or multiple versions of Windows 8 for separate ARM SoCs. But the most important message might be the one that's between the lines, the one that says Microsoft isn't afraid to call out the world's largest chip maker.
Image Credit: compixels.com
Comments
Comments are closed on this article
![]()
serper
March 29, 2012 at 1:30pm
This is a bad thing, Windows should be able to run all Windows applications period. ARM is not a good idea, nor is MetroUI a good idea. I for one do not see any practical reason to upgrade to Windows 8. Windows 7 does everything I need. No DX 12, or significant CPU threading improvements, and no Protogen File System.
As for GenMasterB's comments on the the Registry. You are mistaken, all operating systems have a HIVE or Registry. It's the nature of the beast.
![]()
CaptainFabulous
May 19, 2011 at 7:27pm
Seriously, what's the point of porting Windows to ARM if you can't actually run already available Windows software? Better off sticking with Android.
![]()
Ralph12345
May 19, 2011 at 9:37am
This seem to be the old idea of windows across many difference hardware platforms. The last time Microsoft try this, it failed big. Well, it seems that a bad idea can not be killed. I do not see this working well and I think that it will make for a weak Windows 8 OS.
![]()
Caboose
May 19, 2011 at 1:58pm
What exactly are you referring to, in regards to the last time Microsoft tried to have Windows across multiple hardware platforms?
![]()
GenMasterB
May 19, 2011 at 9:25am
Windows 7 MODE?? Does this mean Windows 8 (in its native form) might actually have gotten rid of the disaster called REGISTRY?? Ghawd I hope so.. If thats the case, no more having to re-install Windows every year or so from registry bloat or corruption. Oh happy day if that's the case..
![]()
ulrichmk
May 19, 2011 at 8:34am
The only thing that intrested me to read this was that picture... very good looking picture.. HAHA
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.
















