Microsoft Advises Developers to Price their Mobile Apps High
Posted 08/20/09 at 04:06:56 PM by Pulkit Chandna
Apart from the eight uncanny people who bought the $999.99 “I Am Rich” app – an underwhelming screensaver - from the iTunes App Store last year, a vast majority happily devours the free and 99-cent apps. But the preponderance of 99-cent apps has made the App Store a cluttered warehouse, banished many quality apps to oblivion, and increased redundancy. Furthermore, many top-notch developers are finding it difficult to set an honest price on premium apps, for they fear their honesty might render these apps unattractive.
Microsoft plans to roll out Windows Marketplace for Mobile in October, 2009. The Redmond-based giant doesn’t want developers to lose out on revenue in a bid to maximize application downloads. According to a Tech Flash report, Loke Uei of Microsoft's mobile developer team feels the popularity of 99-cent apps doesn’t imply that 99 cents is a fair price. "I know, 99 cents is interesting -- yes, consumers like to pay 99 cents for applications. But 99 cents, come on, I think your app is worth more than that," Uei told developers at the inaugural WinMoDevCamp in Redmond.

Image Credit: Cio
Free Market
Submitted by Stinky Fartface on Thu, 08/20/2009 - 6:59pm
There are a lot of apps in the Iphone store that shouldn't be more than $.99. I am glad that there is a marketplace for small software at this price. It is a constant annoyance to me that so many small Windows developers build some tiny, specialized app and want me to fork over $15 to $30 for it. There *should* be a good way to sell apps this cheaply on all platforms.
But I see the conundrum of trying to sell more expensive apps when there are so many cheap ones available. But that's the danger of a free market. If you build in enough extra functionality that customers see the value of your product, you can charge more. But don't try to pass off some 2-bit app for $10- it won't sell. And that is how it should be.
This is interesting,
Submitted by chris.peplin on Thu, 08/20/2009 - 2:33pm
This is interesting, especially for me as a software developer. It echos the debate ranging among photographers over microstock.
Feature
Review
Feature
Feature
Feature






