Media Behemoth Blasts B&N's Nook eBook Reader
Barnes & Noble has been criticized for seemingly rushing to market its Nook e-book reader before manufacturing could churn out enough units to satisfy demand, and already B&N has pushed back its anticipated preorder ship date several times. According to The New York Times, however, availability is the least of the Nook's problems.
The media behemoth posted a review of the Nook on Wednesday and summarily ripped it apart. Speaking of which, the review starts out by accusing the Nook of being "ripped right out of the Kindle's master playbook," noting the same price tag, same off-white plastic frame, the same screen saver, and other similarities. Given the popularity of Amazon's Kindle, this wouldn't be a bad thing, but NYT goes on to thrash the differences between the two units as pointed out by the Nook website.
"Unfortunately, we, the salivating public, might be afflicted with a little holiday disease of our own: Sucker Syndrome," NYT writes. "Every one of the Nook's vaunted distinctions comes fraught with buzz kill footnotes."
For example, NYT points out tht the color touchscreen is just a horizontal strip that, at times, "feels completely, awkwardly disconnected from what it's supposed to control on the big screen above." And of the over one million titles B&N advertises, NYT claims that "well over half of those are junky Google scans" of out of copyright books filled with typos. Then there's the slow performance, quirky Wi-Fi, and unfinished features. Ouch.
And all that's just part of what NYT had to say. Read the entire unflattering review here.

Is NYT's review being too harsh on the Nook, or will it make you think twice about which e-book reader to buy? Sound off in the comments section below!
![]()
ilfipian
December 10, 2009 at 9:16am
I think e-readers have a very short future life. They're the perfect device for more convergence into cell phones (as PDAs did), netbooks and such. Seems like a waste of a thing to get caught up in.
![]()
Craig-g
December 13, 2009 at 4:38pm
For me it's all about the e-ink display. It's just so easy on the eyes when reading in bed for long periods.
![]()
JohnP
December 10, 2009 at 8:33am
Both the engadget and NYT panned the interface. Yet, all that could be fixed in software, right? I know, I know, it is supposed to be perfect out of the box. Shame of BN for releasing a buggy product! Thank goodness that was not the case with XBox360, iPhone, PS3, Wii, Sony Reader, and the Kindle.
![]()
Ruins
December 10, 2009 at 8:33am
I was considering getting a Nook, because my Sony PR500 (first generation sony e-reader requires a firm ware update in order to purchase new books. Sony is going to e-pub format. After reading this, it will be no nookie for me, (pun intended). Instead, I will be sending in my PR500 for a free firmware upgrade.
![]()
jnutley
December 10, 2009 at 6:48am
I buy color PDFs from independent authors. None of the current e-book readers do them justice. I'm fine with my Nokia 800 WIMAX, although it could be a little zippier scrolling. I like the screen size of the Kindle generation, but without color and a decent web browser, I have no interest in that market.
That said, I chipped in with other family members to buy my father-in-law a Nook. He specificly put it on his wish list, so unless this review makes him publicly change his mind, that's at least one more Nook certificate under a tree this season.
![]()
Paul_Lilly
December 10, 2009 at 6:53am
I've got one ordered as a Christmas gift as well, although this one's going to a less tech savvy teen so I'm not too terribly concerned about the potential flaws. I'm anxious to test one out myself, however, and compare to NYT's assessment.
-Paul Lilly

















