Print
The soon-to-be-released Raspberry Pi stretches the definition of a PC: the ARM/Linux board is credit card-sized, capable of performing basic computing tasks, and only costs $25 (or $35 for a 256MB model, doubling the RAM of the $25 offering). Oh yeah, it plays 1080p HD video over HDMI, too. It's that last bit that brings us today's news: with the Raspberry Pi's launch looming, the team just released a video showing the board running a fully-working version of XBMC. That's right; it's a $35 1080p HTPC. Not tempting enough? It also supports AirPlay, even sans XBMC.
Of course, that price would rise a little since you'd probably want to invest in at least some sort of case, seeing as how leaving open circuit boards lying around is a recipe for disaster. The menu and transitions lag a teeny bit, but we gotta say it looks pretty good overall, especially given the price. Who needs cable when you can connect XBMC around your house for $35 bucks per television set? (We say $35 because the $25 model doesn't include an Ethernet port, only Wi-Fi support via a USB dongle.)
The video above shows off the Raspberry Pi's AirPlay capabilities.
The dev team's been very active in responding to comments in the XBMC and AirPlay blog posts, so drop them a line if you have any detailed questions. More general answers about Raspberry Pi can be found in the project's FAQ page.
Meanwhile, a Broadcom developer who helped work on the ARM chip powering the Pi says that it outperforms both Apple's iPhone processor as well as Nvidia's Tegra 2. And it plays Quake III to boot.
Do you think you'll pick one of these up when they become available? Does the XBMC and AirPlay support increase the odds of your doing so?
Comments are closed on this article
DrGerm
February 09, 2012 at 7:32pm
Looks nifty, but just wouldn't do all that I would want. Also, XBMC is fine for nerds, but I cant see any wives or kids or 'regular' guys getting into it.
khalladay
January 25, 2012 at 3:53pm
If the Openelec team creates a build specifically for this board it will be revolutionary, being a long time XBMC user and a more recent Openelec user this is just the kind of low cost hardware Ive needed. I'd be building and giving them out as stocking stuffers to friends and family!
BadCommand
January 25, 2012 at 12:14pm
I don't think it's the hardware at this point that is of issue to mainstream acceptance of small streamers, the processor & board form factors will be tightening up for all the players, but rather the software support. Whether it be popcorn, WD, roku, boxee- none of them bring the whole experience together very well under software. It's all about who sucks less with the least amount (of way too many) serious bugs, rather than who can stream iso's, mkv, divx, etc with hd audio flawlessly.
We/they've been at this game for too long for the level of mediocrity that prevails within the streamer industry to still be the status quo.
Throw this in a wall mountable case (too small to bother with vesa holes) and most importantly bring a solid software experience. I can see this unit anywhere from $50-$75- and I'm sure they'll do extremely well.
Corfy
January 25, 2012 at 12:00pm
I've got a similar device (BeagleBoard-xM) I'm trying to turn into a HTPC. Mine's not capable of 1080p (it can handle 720p, though, which matches my TV, so no complaints there). Mine is a little more expensive (last I looked it was retailing around $150, although I won mine in a raffle, so I paid for two $5 tickets). Mine has a 1 Ghz ARM processor and 512 MB RAM, and it is a tad bigger (3.25" by 3.25", which is still remarkably tiny), but I'm having some trouble getting the OS and drivers to run right. I either get 640x480 video resolution, or I'm not getting any sound. Admittedly, I haven't spent as much time working on it as I probably should.
I probably won't be in the market for another HTPC anytime soon (unless I just absolutely can't get the BeagleBoard to work), but that doesn't mean I won't consider picking one of these up and find another purpose for it. I mean, a $35 computer is hard to pass up.
Keith E. Whisman
January 25, 2012 at 11:58am
It looks great if it had a modern GUI it would be something nobody could live without. Command line interfaces are so 1990's and earlier.
dgrmouse
January 25, 2012 at 12:33pm
XBMC has a bootable Linux distribution. I'm sure it is or will soon be possible to boot it from the USB port or possibly have it load the kernel over the network. XBMC has the most gorgeous 10-foot interface I've ever seen, so I doubt you'd be dropping to the command-line often. I can't wait to see how well it performs first-hand, though. Modern XBMC distributions take a pretty fair amount of horsepower to run with all the eye-candy turned on.
