Print
Most vows to sport a thinner frame don't begin until everyone starts making out their New Year's resolutions, but LG is already off and running with what it claims is the world's thinnest LCD TV.
Not that the company's previous ultra-thin LCD was flabby, but at just 2.6mm (0.1 inches) thick, LG's new 42-inch model is a full 50 percent thinner than its predecessor. It also one-ups the model it's replacing by incorporating an LED backlight system.
Other specs include full HD (1080p) with a 1920 x 1080 pixel resolution and 120Hz refresh rate. And as for weight? Just 4 kilograms, which converts to about 8.8 pounds.
No word yet on price or availability, though LG said it plans to display the ultra-thin set at CES next month.
Image Credit: LG
Comments are closed on this article
Scootiep
December 21, 2009 at 1:52pm
I understand the push of "Thinner is better" but seriously, these things are getting to the point where I feel like I'm going to break them if I pick them up. There has to be a point where you need a little depth just to make the rig sturdy enough to not flex or snap during moving or mounting. I can't say for certain because I haven't seen any comments or tests regarding its durability, but I look at it and think "Jeeze, a couple of bumps on the road or a good pot hole and that screen is done for". Does anybody know how they are combating this issue?
To start press any key...ohh, where's the "Any" key. - Homer Simpson
bpstone
December 21, 2009 at 1:29pm
I'll take one overnight. Make sure you put it under my tree in gold gift wrapper. Daddy's been a good boy this year. lol
Trooper_One
December 21, 2009 at 12:59pm
My guess the base at the centre of the monitor is where it gets clunkier with the in/out ports (e.g. power, HDMI, DVI, whatever else).
I'm sure the girl on the picture would be glad to show you where the holes are.
bpstone
December 21, 2009 at 1:28pm
That's possible and would be a smart choice. I'll be glad when they are done with wireless power and make it mainstream... no joke. That's going to be a massive revolution. :)
Scootiep
December 21, 2009 at 1:48pm
In most cases wireless is a good choice, however, in the case of straight power, it's incredibly inefficient and is going to require a LOT more time before it can successfully and efficiently power something like this.
To start press any key...ohh, where's the "Any" key. - Homer Simpson
