Print
Talk about tough luck for Uniloc, who sued Microsoft for patent infringement and was awarded an unprecedented $388 million verdict by a jury in April. But Microsoft won't have to pay Uniloc a dime, as Judge William Smith of the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island overturned the ruling this week, clearing Microsoft of any wrong doing.
"We are pleased that the court has vacated the jury verdict and entered judgment in favor of Microsoft," spokesman Kevin Kutz said Tuesday.
First filed six years ago, Irvine, California-based Unloc USA and Singapore-based parent company accused Microsoft of using its patented technology for software activation. Specifically, the companies laid claimed to the use of a software activation key to keep users from installing licensed software on multiple PCs
Image Credit: MoneyWise
Comments are closed on this article
Black Lable 69
September 30, 2009 at 10:49pm
Globalization=being more careful with
every step to not add more money to everyone else coffers.
xSc0pE
September 30, 2009 at 5:06pm
Why the judge all of a sudden changed his mind.... hmm..................
Fiercedeity
September 30, 2009 at 4:17pm
Another big issue with the heck a jury was allowed to determine the fine for this case. What in the world does the jury know about patent law and economics that allows them to determine the value of the award (if any). Are they really even educated on this subject? If not, why are we letting uninformed people decide the actual amounts?
Obviously, as shown in this case, the Jamie Thomas and the Tennanbaum case, the juries really got in wrong. How much more of this absurdity needs to happen before we realize that before we let these people decide things in court, that they need to be impartially educated about the subjects first?
Productivity-im...
September 30, 2009 at 7:12pm
"We are disappointed by the decision the trial judge has made to overturn the jury's unanimous verdict in Uniloc's patent infringement case against Microsoft," Davis said in a statement sent to seattlepi.com. "We believe that the jury's verdict in April was thoughtful, well reasoned and supported by the evidence presented. Since the patent status remains unchanged, Uniloc will continue to protect its intellectual property and appeal the Judge's decision to override the jury's verdict to the US Court of Appeals. We are confident that Uniloc will ultimately prevail."
nekollx
September 30, 2009 at 9:57am
Judge William Smith?
Is our Editor in Cheif moonlighting?
------------------------------
Coming soon to Lulu.com --Tokusatsu Heroes--
Five teenagers, one alien ghost, a robot, and the fate of the world.
rseding91
September 30, 2009 at 7:59am
People shouldn't be allowed to patent ideas as vague and often used as that.
If they keep allowing stupid patents like this someone is going to try to patent walking, or some random thing.
"Your breathing to fast, I patented breathing faster then X breaths per minute"
There are to many stupid patents.
