Judge Rips Rambus for Shredding Documents in Nvidia Case
Rambus found itself on the hot seat when a judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Court drilled into the company for destroying documents that could have weakened its patent infringement case against Nvidia. Rambus admitted to shredding documents, but chalked it up to business as usual. Furthermore, an attorney for Rambus said they provided all the documents that were requested of them. That's when Judge Kathleen O'Malley, one of three presiding over the case, tore into Rambus.
"You admit you have no idea what was destroyed! You have no record of what was destroyed!," the judge said, according to Reuters. Later on during the trial, the judge again referenced the document dump and took a swipe at Rambus' motives in doing so.
"Remember, you saved the ones that helped you and destroyed the ones that hurt you," the judge said.
This has been an ongoing dispute between Rambus and Nvidia, as well as several other companies Rambus has accused of patent infringement. The U.S. International Trade Commission ruled in 2010 that Nvidia was guilty of infringing three patents belonging to Rambus, but that was before anyone knew about Rambus destroying documents. That little nugget came out in separate cases involving Micron and Hynix, both of which were sent back to lower courts for further consideration.
Comments
Comments are closed on this article
![]()
bpstone
October 07, 2011 at 11:52am
This group of multi-million/billion dollar companies are something else. Patents are starting to remind me of blood sucking fleas than protection to their inventors or owners.
![]()
praack
October 07, 2011 at 7:28am
it will be interesting to see where this plays out- as this case probably pre-dates the practice of companies having Record Retention Policies.
Record Retention policies is the method where a company can arbitratily state that all emails etc are destroyed after 1 year thus severly decreasing the threat of discovery.
all docuements are given different years - depending on the letter of the law- then forced compliance is put in place- including auto deletion of all emails at the one year point etc
but if this case is ok with not even a fine companies may not need to go through the act of policy making....
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.
















