Japanese Number Crunchers Calculate Pi to 10 Trillion Digits

10

Comments

Comments are closed on this article

avatar

nmanguy

"As for the last digit? It was 5, in case you're wondering."

 

We've had the BBP formula for almost 2 decades, so we wouldn't have to calculate the nearly-ten-billion digits just to get the ten billionth digit.

avatar

thetechchild

Even the page of the project itself says so, actually... I assume the BBP is slower than the actual calculation algorithms, though, otherwise they would've used BBP. Random selection of digit blocks to verify is more likely.

On a minor offtopic note, the college student who wrote the website plays video games, does hardcore math, and has watched Clannad. +9001 geek points and a high five!

avatar

praetor_alpha

Meh, not a good benchmark, imo. And with only 40 digits or so, you can calculate the entire observable universe to within the width of a hydrogen atom; the practicality of 10 trillion digits is questionable.

avatar

biggiebob12345

Kind of a waste of time.  A supercomputer would get the same result in a few hours or so by my guesstimate.

avatar

aarcane

If he would have used Linux and ZFS he would have benefitted from both GMP and the ability to use ZFS to mitigate the impact of drive failures entirely.

avatar

Wonko33

What a non-story. If he did that with pen and paper then wow, but am I really impressed he left his computer running for a year? Yawn! 

avatar

AETAaAS

The only thing I'm interested in is not mentioned. What make were the hard drives? I would try avoiding them. :p

avatar

somethingelse

Forget make of the hard drive, what kind of raid level were these guys running?  Three raid controllers, and each time a drive popped, there'd be data loss?  Was he running raid0 arrays?  With that kind of gear, raid5/6 would not add a lot of overhead.  raid0+1 would be better, that would eat up a lot more space.

Unless it's the 2TB OS drive that kept popping, but then why would they need to roll back?

As for how this benefits anyone...well, it doesn't...who cares :)

avatar

d3v

It says they wrote 44tb of data during the calculations which was later compressed down to 7.6tb. I imagine all those writes took their toll on the hard disks and that is why they died.

 

avatar

iceman08

And this benefits me...?

 

Props for using a desktop, but I'd rather eat pie than know pi

Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook

Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.

Login with Facebook
Log in using Facebook to share comments and articles easily with your Facebook feed.