"Intelligent" Supercomputers Put to the Turing Test
Check out our list of the top 10 supercomputers of all time here!

A machine’s ability to think is something that’s been questioned for nearly half a century, thanks to mathematician Alan Turing. Turing, who helped decipher German military codes during WWII, created a test that is designed to find out if a machine can think on its own. The test consists of a machine attempting to fool a judge into believing that it could be a human by having a text-based conversation on any subject. If the computer’s responses convince the judge that they are speaking with a human, then it has passed the Turing test, and is believed to be capable of thought.
This Sunday, six computer programs will be put through the Turing test in an attempt to win their creator not only an 18-carat gold medal and $100,000, but to prove that computers are capable of thought. The programs competing for the prize go by the names Alice, Brother Jerome, Elbot, Eugene Goostman, Jabberwacky and Ultra Hal. While the names sound like those of rejected VH1 reality show contestant names, they’re far more intelligent, and won’t be spitting on any of their opponents anytime soon.
Should the computers be found to have the ability to think, it’ll raise ethical questions as to how conscious a computer is, and if humans have the “right” to switch them off.
But the Turing test isn’t for everyone. "The test is misguided. Everyone thinks it's you pitting yourself against a computer and a human, but it's you pitting yourself against a computer and computer programmer,” criticizes Professor AC Grayling of Birkbeck College, “AI is an exciting subject, but the Turing test is pretty crude."
Can you tell which one of these conversations between Kevin Warwick (KW), a cyberneticist at the University of Reading, and a computer?
Conversation 1:
Subject: Hello. My name is Nick and I am a human.
KW: Are you happy being a human?
Subject: Yes, I am. Are you? Good. Then we are both happy.
KW: Yes, I am. Are you happy with your life at present?
Subject: Parts of it. I hate my job, but most people do, right?
KW: I'm OK with mine. What is your job?
Subject: I work as an 'online internet advertising monitor', which is fancy language for electronic filing. What do you do?
KW: I interrogate humans and machines.
Subject: Which ones do you prefer, humans or machines?
KW: Which do you prefer?
Subject: Hmm. Depends on for what purpose you mean.
KW: To go to a restaurant, for example?
Subject: Then I would much prefer going with a human.
Conversation 2:
Subject: Hello, my name is Mike and I am a man.
KW: Are you happy being a human?
Subject: Judge, I'm a guy.
KW: Does that worry you?
Subject: Don't worry, we'll work everything through.
KW: Do you have worries then?
Subject: Let's move on from that basis.
KW: Why?
Subject: Why? I like this subject.
KW: What is the subject, do you think?
Subject: What is the subject I wonder if I think? I know that it's good to thonk about. Think deeplt about mysterious subjects.
KW: What mysterious subjects?
Subject: Think deeply about mysterious dubjects.
KW: What's a dubject?
Answer: If you chose Conversation 2, you are correct. Congratulations!
Image Credit: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer
Check out our list of the top 10 supercomputers of all time here!
![]()
proto-bytes
October 28, 2010 at 6:08pm
More realistily it would be a better test if you make it a double blind. Use the old Turing method, and also use this method, see how well a computer AI to AI can discover weather or not the other is intelligent. This generates a large matrix to be analized for all humans of each range of IQ and personality type, and each computer system and its AI protential. It would kind of be like creating an AI IQ test, it would have to be measured on a bell curve, and have to be statistically correlated to the Human IQ natural IQ distribution bell curve. If there is a correlation in a given vector of the matrix, then it passes that AI intelligent classification quality of being self aware. Now that is a real test. I can easly write a subconcious AI program that is aware of our reality, but not it's own. Is that alive or not? It would be meaninful to humans preception, but it's own perception woulud be concave.
@ProtoBytes
![]()
hogkill
October 07, 2008 at 8:16am
artifical intelligence off of metal hardware + computer program is impossilbe.
It couldnt be done even if mankind was given an infinite amount of time to do it.
Biological computers on the otherhand, could have an intelligence (not an "Artifical one")
![]()
pratt
October 06, 2008 at 11:29pm
I'm rooting for Ultra Hal! Even if the implications of it's sentience could spell certain doom for our brave scientists....
![]()
Keith E. Whisman
October 07, 2008 at 8:35pm
If you remember 2010 it was discovered that Hal had been given conflicting orders that the mission must be completed at any cost. Hal determined that the mission was in jeopardy so he killed the crew. Perfectly logical and seeing as Hal willfully gave his life in the end of the movie to help the Russian ship escape with the Americans on board goes to show you that it really wasn't his fault. He was obeying his programming.
![]()
zeringue
October 06, 2008 at 5:14pm
Well i hope the new AI machines handle contractions better than Data.















