Intel VP Thinks Netbooks are “Fine for an Hour”
Posted 11/30/08 at 06:46:40 PM | by Justin Kerr
Analysts have been speculating for almost a year now on the future of netbooks, and if this new category of ultra mobile PCs would ever threaten sales of their larger form factor brethren. Intel’s Vice President of sales and marketing Stu Pann has weighed in on the issue, and he states in no uncertain terms, netbooks will never replace laptops. According to Pann "If you've ever used a Netbook and used a 10-inch screen size--it's fine for an hour. It's not something you're going to use day in and day out."
Maximum PC readers have spoken out in the comments, and the forums with similar concerns, but somehow it seems a bit more shocking to hear it from Intel itself. Many have questioned the reason for Intel’s statement given that they seem to be denouncing a market for which they are almost single handed responsible for creating. Then again, Intel is pretty much free to say anything it wants given that competition from VIA is slowly fading away and AMD isn’t even interested in competing. AMD has openly criticized the form factor and has made it clear that they don’t see a future in netbooks. According to AMD netbook return rates are disproportionately high as disappointed consumers come to grips with the hype not living up to reality. So what do you think of ultra portables? Will the dual core models make a difference?
I can definitely see the use
Submitted by horzo on Mon, 2008-12-01 17:03
I can definitely see the use of netbooks for in-class note taking and travel if you don't need to run anything resource-intensive. Using it as a primary PC? Hell no. Considering how cheap they are, who cares?
Sometimes Portability>All
Submitted by mikemckay on Mon, 2008-12-01 05:18
its the portability!! im a student with a normal laptop and a netbook and i would MUCH rather take the netbook to school on days when i am just taking notes or doing something on the internet and do not need something more powerful to run sql management studio express or visual studio etc. the battery life is way better too which means in addition to carrying a smaller and lighter laptop around, often i dont even have to take the power brick with me either, which takes a LOT of extra space and is usually a pain given the size and shape of the brick and power cords. the power brick for my normal laptop is bigger than a 500ml soft drink can....with the netbook its about as big as half a deck of cards. people dont usually pay much attention to the power bricks and their size/weight but when you are on the go its important too!
I think there's a market the OEMs ignor...
Submitted by Wildebeast on Sun, 2008-11-30 21:19
I've been watching broken/repaired used laptops sell on eBay for a while.
I think there is a market for cheap, light machines that are internet & productivity app capabile.
Maybe not power-users, but for retirees & adolescents (or pre-adolescent) ---something like a MacAir, with just enough specs to run the office suites, internet, maybe a little multi-media --it sounds pretty good. It doesn't need a huge screen, touchscreen, or even be all that light. --Just fill the necessities & not be so expensive that loss or damage means you have to save over several pay-checks before you have a working unit again.
I suspect the OEMs ignore this possiblity, because they'd rather sell machines in the low price-range that are "borderline," with chipsets and other parts that they want to sell at a "just get rid of it," price. (Kind of like computer printers --without the expected payday from ink cartridges.)
Maybe they literally can't make a profit on an inexpensive machine, without loading it with second-rate parts.
Is there some other reason you can't get a netbook with an Atom, a 14 inch screen, and a semi-standard sized keyboard??? I haven't heard yet, if they are sticking these in the EEpc yet.
a 14 inch scree kinda
Submitted by nekollx on Mon, 2008-12-01 11:16
a 14 inch scree kinda defeats the point of a utra portable.
My Laptop is a intel Celeron duel core 1.83 gHZ, with a 12.3 inch screen and thats bulky to be Ultra portable it really need to come un under double digit screen size
Netb00k AT0M Dua1-C0res WhERE ThEY AT
Submitted by JMG760 on Sun, 2008-11-30 19:25
As soon as Intel releases a dual-core atom atleast 2GHz with a 800 fsb I will be satisfied. And companies like ASUS equiping their netbooks with a decent videocard that can atleast play all of the new games on a netbook is awesome. No GEEK can go wrong with that setup. But the single-core atoms running at 1.6GHz are worthless. Netbooks can be use for almost any task at hand except burn cds but now a days who uses discs, but you can always use an external optical drive if you still need that option. Netbooks at the moment do not have the power to replace your typical laptop but having one can be more convenient for its compact size and battery life; compared to a $300-$600 laptop that can be bulky with old hardware that has a lower battery life. Until Intel comes out with its dual-core atoms for netbooks higher than 1.6GHz will be a relief of satisfaction, for now we can only dream. =, (
Forgive those who buy these
Submitted by scuzzo on Sun, 2008-11-30 18:26
I don't understand why people want to pay $300 for something that wants to be a laptop when it grows up. I can Craigslist an add for a laptop for the same price and get twice the machine. If I kick in an extra $100 I can get a new laptop. None of any of this makes any sense to me. It's just like throwing good money out the window. I understand they are "ultra-portable", but why would I want to carry around one of these things when I can't even use them to do anything other than the very lightest work.









