Intel Settles Antitrust Dispute with FTC, But Denies Any Wrongdoing
The Federal Trade Commission and Intel have finally settled their antitrust dispute. Even though the parleys proved a bit more protracted than the FTC had originally anticipated – the original deadline had to be extended by two weeks, the settlement was reached with a bit of time to spare before the revised deadline (12:01 a.m. on Friday, August 6) could expire. Intel has lent its assent to provisions that will limit its ability to stifle competition, the FTC said in a release.
The settlement applies to CPUs, GPUs and chipsets and effectively disallows almost every anti-competitive practice the FTC attributed to the chip maker. For instance, Intel was accused of employing a carrot-and-stick policy while dealing with computer makers and stifling the competition in the process. But the terms of the settlement expressly prohibit the Santa Clara chip maker from “conditioning benefits to computer makers in exchange for their promise to buy chips from Intel exclusively or to refuse to buy chips from others; and retaliating against computer makers if they do business with non-Intel suppliers by withholding benefits from them.”
While the world's largest chip maker is not willing to view the settlement as an admission of guilt, it has agreed to adopt a very conciliatory approach towards rivals like AMD, Nvidia, and Via. The settlement requires Intel to support the “PCI Express Bus, for at least six years in a way that will not limit the performance of graphics processing chips.” It has also agreed to extend Via’s x86 licensing agreement by five years after the current one runs out in 2013.

Comment
Comments are closed on this article
![]()
Lhot
August 05, 2010 at 8:40am
Intel bare knuckle,-brow beats any and all competitors for years, in every imaginable way, and gets a slap on the wrist and 6 commandments as a result. While this is a great solution to the classic "irresistable force meets the immovable object"...I am truly amazed that this was settled with such obvious lack of bloodshed. Everyone got to "save face" and the result is good for everyone. The only part I didn't like about the settlement was that some of the '6 commandments' ONLY apply for 5 to 6 years. This will make up for "past" anti-competitive practices, but leaves the door open for future exploitation as soon as the time limits imposed, are reached.
It's way past time to create LAWS, not temporary mandates, that will prevent ANY large corporate entity from EVER employing anti-competative practices like Intel did.
When is Microsofts turn in the FTC spotlight? They employ the same techniques to utterly crush competition, and this FTC settlement with Intel, does not effect Microsoft...unless in the remotest sense of "legal precedence"....at some time in the future.
I think we need to get back to 'let the product and the product only speak for its worthiness'. This under the table wheeling and dealing, brow beating and generally thowing corporation weight around... is practiced by every company I've ever heard of and it needs to stop.
Next on the plate, is the issue that the very same "practices" are being used by the major ISP's to "encourage" congress into passing a law that will, if the ISP's have their way, hurt all consumers across the board.
Maybe congress should pass a law that makes receiving OR offering, any compensation of any kind for "favors rendered", illegal! Oh my bad, that's already a law ! :/
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.















