Intel Decides to Hold Off on USB 3.0 Support Until 2011
Intel Decides to Hold Off on USB 3.0 Support Until 2011
Posted 10/22/2009 at 1:28pm
| by Bart Salisbury
12
Comments
Print
The need for speed goes on unabated, but fulfilling that need became a bit less likely with Intel’s decision to wait until 2011 to integrate support for USB 3.0 into its PC chip sets.
USB 3.0 promises to bump up throughput between computers and peripherals to a theoretical high of 4.8 Gbps: a 10x increase over USB 2.0’s present raw transfer rate. The increase in speed would make it easier for users to manage the massive amounts of data in raw digital images and video, and their ever expanding MP3 collections. USB 3.0 would also permit more power for USB-powered devices.
Problem is, says an unnamed source quoted by the EE Times: “It's hard to commit to an emerging technology like this when the key silicon enablers are not making it a priority. You get into a chicken-and-egg situation.” In other words, no one is interested in making, because no one has committed to buying. Given the lack of interest Intel has decided its time is better spent working out issues with the Nehalem processor’s integrated memory controller, and coming to terms with the new 5 GHz PCI Express 2.0 specification.
In the meantime I’ve got to dig out my FireWire cables.
Image Credit: Intel, USB.org
Tags:
More like this
routine
October 23, 2009 at 5:50am
Hrmm.... wasn't it Intel that had a commercial touting the invention of USB?
major_tom
October 22, 2009 at 8:44pm
I'M MAD AS HELL AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE! A protest! Retaliate, I say! You know that Intel ad where they're debating where to cut the cake first, and finally a real man steps up and gets himself a damn corner piece, and the first dork asks "Why don't you just pop all the balloons and spit in the punch?"
Great idea, you clown! Don't mind if I do! At least SOMEONE will actually ENJOY the party! ME! Let's not forget, I'm YOUR CUSTOMER! I'm The Man who pulls out his wallet and pays for your product with cold hard cash. Only in THIS case it happens to be a hot, sweaty, fistfull of hundred dollar bills! I have half a mind to cram 'em down your throat and hope you choke! Why wait for either the chicken or the egg? I'm hungry now, dammit, and I don't care if it's scrambled eggs or chicken soup! Actually the market is more like a salad, now that I think about it. Hasn't someone already released some USB 3.0 external hard drives? I'm sure I saw that on here the other day. Oh yeah, Buffalo. Here's a quote from the article:
"The company also plans to offer NEC's IFC-PCIE2U3 2-port PCI-Express x1
host controller because, well, what good is a USB 3.0 drive without a
controller to take advantage of it?"
Now there's a company that can figure out how to cut a cake.
Thanks for stepping up to the cake to play with yourself, Intel. I'm sure it was delicious and moist while it lasted. Now step aside.
quickone
October 22, 2009 at 4:23pm
I think there is a compitition who can take longer, Wi-Fi with N and USB with 3.0, so far, we are losing
~~The difference between insanity and genius is merely succes~~
William Koehler
October 22, 2009 at 2:58pm
I had been looking forward to USB 3.0 being rolled out in Intel chipsets hopefully starting in early 2010. I routinely use USB 2.0 drives to back up SD and HD video projects. The data sets are large. Loading or unloading a 1 TB drive takes 8 hours at USB 2.0 speeds. I can't wait for a higher speed, generic, available damn near everywhere connection to be rolled out. Which is exactly why I don't use FireWire or eSATA.
Definitly depressing.
mysteriousgamer
October 22, 2009 at 2:47pm
There are still plenty of other companies who can and will support USB 3.0 into their chipsets. VIA, AMD, Nvidia are just a few examples. AMD, this is your chance to re-assert your dominance in the processor/chipset war.
quantumnerd
October 23, 2009 at 5:09pm
It's not that I hate intel, but whenever they fumble another company can correct intel's mistake, thus gaining market share, thus being more competitive, thus making their and intel's products better.
-=[The name's Quantumnerd, and if you mock my name you're clearly missing the point]=-
lien_meat
October 22, 2009 at 1:52pm
This really sucks. I was really looking forward to have usb3 soon. I was HOPING that would happen sometime around 2Q 2010, but it looks like that's not gonna happen for sure now. (does win7 support usb3 yet, ubuntu does, don't know about OSX, but I'm guessing it doesn't yet)
### I'm an idiot, and I approve this message ###
Slugbait
October 24, 2009 at 12:07am
Win7 does not support USB3. Last thing I heard, it might happen in a service pack (likely SP2). Vista support is a waffle, and they don't talk about XP anymore.
Last I heard about Linux is that they have written driver support, but no way to verify if it works yet (need hardware support, both mobos and devices).
Again, last I heard is Snow Leopard also does not support USB3.
So...there is basically nobody for Intel to support.
I also know a dev who is working on a USB3 device. Apparently, some hair loss has occured while trying to write drivers...
USB3 has all the earmarks of being even more of a nightmare than USB2 was.
n0b0dykn0ws
October 22, 2009 at 1:44pm
The conspiracy theorist in me wonders what Apple gave/promised Intel to hold off on USB 3.0
n0b0dykn0ws
gendoikari1
October 22, 2009 at 2:01pm
We can only assume free iPhones. Or heavy bags with large $s emblazoned on them.
Connect with MaximumPC
Featured Content
Where have all the memorable videogame enemies gone?
This month's issue
Feature
How to Set Up A New PC
Feature
The State of GPU Computing
How-To
Benchmark an Android Phone
Build It
Sandy Bridge-E
Most Commented Articles
Latest Max PC Tweets
- maximumpc: We referred to "motherboad" prices in an earlier tweet. Not to be confused with motherboard prices, which are ALSO going up.6 hours 28 min ago
- maximumpc: Oh hooray. Motherboad price hikes inbound. http://t.co/nacDWfjJ9 hours 3 min ago
- maximumpc: AMD's New Direction For 2012: Heterogenous Computing, Trinity, and Hondo http://t.co/2KzhCT1N1 day 1 hour ago
