Intel Claims Its CPUs Have Saved $2 Billion in Energy Costs
Posted 09/30/08 at 05:20:08 PM | by Paul Lilly
Whatever you do, don't blame the bad economy on Intel. Engineers working for the chip maker claim today's processors have netted a savings of 20 Terawatt hours over that of earlier generations if used in the same time period. In monetary terms, that equates to saving the world economy $2 billion in energy costs since the Core architecture's launch two years ago. Of course, the inefficient and hot-running Prescotts of yesteryear didn't exactly set the bar very high for green improvements, but $2 billion (if correct) is impressive no matter how you slice it.
"This is no small figure - it’s a significant amount of energy savings, and an example of what technology innovation by the ICT industry can do to improve energy efficiency on a large scale," writes Lorie Wiggle, GM of Intel's Eco-Technology Program.
Meanwhile, while Intel's Atom series doesn't have nearly the global energy impact as its desktop and business CPUs do, it's interesting to note that the recently released dual-core Atom 330 processor doubles up its power consumption over the Atom 230 processor.

Image Credit: Intel
actually their processors
Submitted by hogkill on Wed, 2008-10-01 15:29
actually their processors have cost trillions in energy, not saved money. if you think about it correctly.
power supplies
Submitted by xunknownx on Tue, 2008-09-30 17:23
the processor may save more power, but more people have higher watt power supplies now which uses up more energy.
Higher Watt PSU
Submitted by One4yu2c on Tue, 2008-09-30 18:01
A higher wattage power supply doesn't mean you're using more power than a lower wattage unit. It's about how much power your components are actually drawing. And because newer PSUs (which have also grown in wattage capabilities) tend to be more energy efficient than models of yesteryear, you might actually be using less power than the older model it replaced.
To grossly oversimplify (and it doesn't work out exactly like this in practice), if your system is pulling 250W, then you'll consume 250W regardless of whether you have a 700W or 1000W PSU.
enlightened
Submitted by BestUsernameEver on Wed, 2008-10-01 07:09
That's interesting. So even if my PSU is rated at 800W or whatever, if the total draw of my components is only 400W then my power supply should only be drawing at or near 400W? That's nice to know. I always assumed that because it said 800W, that's how much power it sucked up. That makes me feel a little better about my power usage.
Yup
Submitted by One4yu2c on Wed, 2008-10-01 15:05
That's correct. Think of it as headroom for future upgrades. A typical desktop system doesn't come anywhere close to consuming 800W of power, and unless you're running multiple high end videocards, you have plenty of wattage headroom to play with for future upgrades.
Really want to be enlightened? Jump over to the eXtreme Power Supply Calculator, configure your setup, and hit calculate. You might be surprised at just how comparatively little power you're actually drawing.









