Quantcast

Don't have an account? Register Now! Forgot password?

Maximum IT
News

IBM Introduces Industry's Fastest One Terabyte Tape Drive

comment Commentsprint Printemail EmailDeliciousDiggStumbleUponRedditFacebookSlashdot

Sun can lay claim as the first company to release a one terabyte tape drive with its StorageTek T10000B, but the company didn't have long to celebrate. Raining on their parade, IBM has released a one terabyte tape drive of its own, only this one runs 33 percent faster than Sun's.

The new IBM TS1130 tape drive can store up to one terabyte of uncompressed data per cartridge at 160MB/sec, or 40MB/sec faster than the T10000B, allowing the new model to complete backups up to 54 percent faster than the previous generation drive.

IBM describes the tape drives as being able to hold the text of one million books, and to keep that data from becoming corrupt, the TS1130 uses a special head overcoat technology IBM claims will lengthen the overall life expectancy of the drive. The TS1130 also utilizes a "Giant Magnetoresistive (GMR) head design that leverages IBM's world-record achievement of developing a more sensitive read-write head for the magnetic tape system." In other words, expect fewer data read errors.

The new drive uses existing 3592 rewritable and WORM (Write Once Read Many) cartridges, offering backwards compatibility with Gen 1, 2, and 3 formats supporting both read and write for Gen 2 and read only for Gen 1. And backwards compatibility is a good thing too, as IBM says the TS1130 will carry a starting price of $39,050, with an upgrade option from existing drives for a more manageable $19,500. Ouch.

Image Credit: IBM

COMMENTS:2
COMMENTS
avatarYaY for tape drives!

Yes they do use tape drives still and for several good reasons.

First, tape degrades the slowest of electronic media. Most electronic storage that isn't in constant state of degradation has a life of 5-15 years depending on what type of media it is. Tape lasts much much longer.

RAID is good, but your archiving data, which makes RAID not attractive. When your archiving tons and tons of data on tons of hard drives, you not only have constant disk failure riusking the loss of data, but you have to keep those disks contantly powered for RAID to work. The logistics of long term maintenance and the space needed, verus, simply storing the tape is the major advantage for tape. 

Login or register to post comments
avatardoes anybody use tape drives

does anybody use tape drives anymore? I can't see how they can be more reliable, quicker, and cheaper than an offsite RAID solution.

Login or register to post comments

This Month's Issue
FEATURE How to Get FREE Programs, Services, Software & MoreFEATURE Digital Photo Printer RoundupHOW TOBuild a 3D CameraFEATUREDIY Arcade PCWHITE PAPERHow TRIM Works