GSC Trickles Out STALKER 2 Details: More Survival Elements, No Compromises Because of Consoles, New Engine
STALKER's back for another irradiated Russian romp, and this time, GSC Game World's not playing around. No clear skies, no Pripyats – just a good old-fashioned “2.” So then, what's in a (number-centric) name? GSC's broken its particularly thick veil of silence to divulge a few details.
Foremost, despite STALKER 2 being the first non-PC-exclusive entry in the franchise, it's still definitely a PC game at heart.
“Since we develop primarily on PC, you won't see any compromises in the PC version. The key difference between the PC and console versions will be the beauty of graphics (meaning PC will offer more of visual effects),” read a post on the game's official Facebook page.
Also in the “sure bet” category are new mutants, DX11 support, a brand new game engine, more secret underground complexes, an increased focus on survival elements, and more artifacts. The faction wars system, meanwhile, has politely been told to take a hike.
Unfortunately, GSC's can't say for sure whether we'll be leaving our winding trails of urine (“Invisible radiation monster eeeeeeeeeeeek”) through a completely open version of the Zone or one that's been chopped up with load times. Here's hoping for the former.
All in all, it's sounding pretty darn promising so far. Granted, the majority of the game could still be a drawing on a napkin for all we know. For now, the release date's “sometime in 2012,” which is roughly seven years off in dog years and “Whoa, that's nearly two Call of Duties from now!” in impatient-yet-paradoxically-ADD-riddled-gamer years.

Comments
Comments are closed on this article
![]()
aso chudi
January 17, 2012 at 2:39am
I am impressed by the way you covered this topic. It is not often I come across a blog with captivating articles like yours. I will note your feed to keep up to date with your approaching updates.Just striking and do uphold up the good work.
![]()
aso chudi
January 15, 2012 at 1:05am
Generally I do not learn from posts on blogs, however I wish to say that this write-up very pressured me to check out and I did so! Your writing style has amazed me. Thank you, quite nice article.
![]()
aso chudi
January 14, 2012 at 4:07am
It took me several days to read it because I’d read it in snippets, leave to do something else, and then come back to it.
![]()
neal123
January 04, 2012 at 2:30pm
The thoughts are very well laid out and it was refreshing to read. I was able to find the information that I was looking for. I just wanted to leave a comment as a token of appreciation. Thanks for sharing this on the Net.
![]()
bolod
December 26, 2011 at 3:51am
Hey buddy,this is one of the best posts that I’ve ever seen; you may include some more ideas in the sametheme. I’m still waiting for some interesting thoughts from your side in your next post.
![]()
LatiosXT
January 13, 2011 at 9:12am
Hey, it'll be like CryEngine 3 maybe. A stream lined version of the same engine with enough scalability to crank it up to 11 on PCs. Probably a not-so-good comparison, but Source still runs as good as ever on both the PC and console (heck, it even runs on the original Xbox) because Valve planned on scalability.
But if they're going to keep the same game formula, there's one thing else that's on my mind that may or may not be a problem. The game is still freakin' hard. And while I've seen people comment that Bioshock's VitaChamber system is a step up in gaming, I thought it took away from the atmosphere. What was I supposed to think when I saw a Big Daddy? Adorn brown pants and call it a day? Or just go "meh, whatever, you can kill me all day and I'll be here." And practically all FPS games now and days have either a checkpoint and reload system, or a die and spawn elsewhere system. I just hope STALKER 2 gets neither, because then that takes the fun out of it.
Or at least make it like GTA. That game handled death pretty well.
![]()
OliverSudden
January 13, 2011 at 7:10am
Want to know the real reason for the engine change?
Because every shooter developer wants to have Call of Duty-like numbers. So they think to themselves...what is it about the COD franchise that we can copy? And they came up with in-game scripted sequences. The truth is that the x-ray engine, the venerable motor that's been powering the Stalker world since the beginning, cannot handle in-game scripted sequences very well. With x-ray, it's cutscenes or nothing. Anyone who's played all the Stalker games as well as any COD game knows the difference I'm talking about. In GSC's quasi-collective mind, in-game scripted sequences mean the difference between selling 1 million copies (which itself is a pretty good number) and 10 million copies (which means many many extra rubles, comrade).
Look at Metro 2033, the shooter made by former Stalker developers. It was a damn fine shooter, full of atmosphere and S.T.A.L.K.E.R.-esque dread. But it was very heavy with in-game scripting and it was on rails like a mo-fo. In fact, about half the time, it was literally on rails.
In reality, however, I don't think anyone (not even the guys at Infinity Ward) can say "because a game has in-game scripted sequences means it will sell well."
Remember in the mid-to-late-eighties there were like 4 or 5 different body-swap movies in the theaters? Big, Vice Versa, Like Father Like Son, 18 Again, etc? It's like that. If you see someone being successful by doing X, then you shouldn't be surprised when twelve guys also do X.
If STALKER 2 doesn't feature big-time scripted sequences like COD and Metro 2033, I'll eat my LCD monitor. The trick is...can they do that and keep it sandboxy too? I hope so.
![]()
Razor86
January 13, 2011 at 12:07am
The current engine isn't exactly known to perform well under pressure, maybe this new engine will be more streamlined or something.
![]()
Nimrod
January 12, 2011 at 9:45pm
“Since we develop primarily on PC, you won't see any compromises in the PC version." Ill believe it when I see it.
The engine they have been using is godly looking and has been tuned up at every turn for more gfx, its already at DX11. The only reason I can think of for them to use an entierly new engine is because they completely changed the game formula to fit it on the dinky consoles.
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.















