Google Takes The "+" Out Of Search

14

Comments

Comments are closed on this article

avatar

aso chudi

I became anticipating intended for this type of write-up so I currently have attained various valuable details made by this web site Appreciate your sharing giving this level of detail, There is absolutely no far better strategy to grant details to opportunity seekers than you are on in this way.

faith quotes

avatar

aso chudi

Really i am impressed from this post. The person who created this post is a genius and knows how to keep the readers connected.Thanks for sharing this with us. I found it informative and interesting. Looking forward for more updates.

quotes about liars

avatar

neal123

I have been reading all the replies here, i had a great deal of info, some significant most are not. But i shall say it very active page.

marilyn monroe quotes

avatar

bolod

Generally I do not learn from posts on blogs, however I wish to say that this write-up very pressured me to check out and I did so! Your writing style has amazed me. Thank you, quite nice article.

facebook status

avatar

TechLarry

Great.  Let's dumb down the internet for those that don't understand boolean searches, the most powerful form of search there is.

avatar

Wily_One

Yeah I used the + all the time.  Grrr...

avatar

Danthrax66

WTF the + in google was never used for that. It was supposed to add the +whatever as a secondary term to search for in addition to the actualy search. And - would take away any results with the word following the minus. Quotes have always been used for exact word matches, google is lieing to us.

avatar

someuid

I've never really used the + operator, but I do the use - operator alot to get rid of terms I don't want to see.

With google's search algorithm making use of "number of refering links" to bump a page up in the results, there are times that works against you.

avatar

cocallahan

I have always put exact phrases I wanted to search for in quotes. Was I doing it wrong before? Guess it's nice to know I'll be doing it right from now on.

avatar

bloodgain

I figured this out a few days ago. As a software developer, sometimes I have to force Google not to assume that the name of a Linux command is a misspelled word or replace it with synonyms. Other times, I need to make sure it doesn't return less useful results because one of the side terms is more common in normal speech.

At first, I was somewhat annoyed -- then I realized they added the functionality to the already-useful double quotes. So long as the ability to force a term is still there, I'm fine with it.

Usually, Google's "fuzzy search" is useful, especially since it includes results using synonymous terms. That way, I don't need to go through the thesaurus to find what I'm looking for. It's only in special situations (like a software keyword) most people would need to force a term.

avatar

blip2004

oh god. Trying to search up anything for linux on google makes me want to shoot myself. No I don't want 500 different forum posts about how people have screwed up their boot loader, I want a website that has all the commands for grub or whatever.

avatar

szore

I've been putting in quotes for years, never used + operator at all.

avatar

rook

I hate having to force a word in my query by adding in quotations because Google deems it inrevelant. I know what I'm searching for.

avatar

kamikaji

inb4 shitstorm of Apple fanboys crying foul because (GASP!) Google wants to make sure it's easier to get to their social site, but still be able to use operators (WHAT A CRIME!).

Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook

Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.

Login with Facebook
Log in using Facebook to share comments and articles easily with your Facebook feed.