Google is Openly Seeking New Technological Innovators
Comments
Comments are closed on this article
![]()
JCBarry
November 03, 2009 at 1:20pm
Title edited to avoid confusion.
Thanks.Jay Barry
MaxPC Profile | Jason Barry
![]()
JCBarry
November 03, 2009 at 12:39pm
While the adjective use could be subject for debate, this could be considered a threat to many developers already working for Google for the simple fact that they are hiring.
Not only are they hiring, they essentially made a "call to arms" post looking for innovators. Ask yourself how you would feel if your boss said to you "I'm looking to hire people for your position."
Not a typo, but it could be open to interpretation.
Jay Barry
MaxPC Profile | Jason Barry
![]()
Taz0
November 03, 2009 at 1:01pm
If by hiring new people they meant firing old ones, then that contradicts: "This is a much different attitude from earlier this year when Google made job cuts".
Also, Schmidt said, "Innovation is the technological pre-condition for growth", the important word being "growth", which means hiring new people in order to expand, not replacing existing positions.
![]()
JCBarry
November 03, 2009 at 1:01pm
I disagree. The statement is still valid. I didn't (and Google didn't) say that they would be firing anybody.
However, the fact that they are hiring and that they are broadcasting it (with incentives) could make existing engineers uncomfortable with their job security.
Again, it is open to interpretation.
Jay Barry
MaxPC Profile | Jason Barry
![]()
Taz0
November 03, 2009 at 1:20pm
They say that they want to "Grow" and "Innovate" and they're happy with their current staff ("he cites the success of Google Earth, Android, and Google Chrome"). So happy, in fact, that they even gave them a "Founders Award, a multimillion-dollar stock bonus". And if that's not enough, the linked article states that "innovation that's only possible when you can attract and retain the world's finest minds". If they're so proud of their Earth, Android and Chrome innovations then they obviously plan to retain those people, and have clearly stated that. Where could you possibly get the idea that they want to fire anyone? This is not even speculation, it's pure fabrication.
![]()
Taz0
November 03, 2009 at 6:14am
So what massive threat did Google dangle in front of its engineers?
![]()
sbud4u
November 03, 2009 at 12:23pm
I believe this was a typo. It probably should have read "Google dangles massive TREAT in front of its engineers."
![]()
Taz0
November 03, 2009 at 12:54pm
Even after you change "Threat" to "Treat", it still doesn't make sense. Why would Google dangle a treat in front of its own engineers when it's trying to recruit new engineers?
![]()
Tekzel
November 03, 2009 at 8:40am
Yea, I failed to see the threat at all, much less an earth shattering MASSIVE threat.
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.

















