FBI Sets Legal Precedent in Botnet Sting
FBI investigators tried a new approach to taking down a zombie PC gang. For the first time ever, federal authorities in the U.S. seized control of the bad guys' servers, a move that required the U.S. Justice Department to seek permission from a judge in order to carry out the sting. After doing so, authorities were able to counter-attack by issuing their own commands, programming the malware to shutdown, and also log IP addresses of infected machines.
With this information, authorities can turn around and notify ISPs about which machines are compromised, which can then share that information with the victims, according to a BBC report.
While this is a new approach in the U.S., the same tactic has been used elsewhere. Dutch police took a similar approach when it shut down the Bredolab botnet, prompting privacy gurus to question whether or not such a move was legal.
In this case, the FBI was targeting the Coreflood botnet. Coreflood is estimated to have infected some 2.3 million machines, resulting in millions of dollars for its operators.
Comments
Comments are closed on this article
![]()
aarcane
April 14, 2011 at 12:16pm
I'm all for notifying infected victims and seizing systems that are clearly used to compromise security like that. the only grey area I see is what if it's a legitimate server that's been hacked in the future? should they be able to close down a legitimate business in the process? I think there does need to be a little common sense and damage controll involved in the process, but in general it gets my green seal of approval.
![]()
KenLV
April 15, 2011 at 1:21am
“the only grey area I see is what if it's a legitimate server that's been hacked in the future? should they be able to close down a legitimate business in the process?”
Think of it this way, if you legally own a gun, or a car, or just about anything, but someone takes that item (with or without your permission) and uses it to commit a crime – or MANY crimes, don’t the authorities have a right, nay and OBLIGATION to wrest control of that item from the perpetrator of the crime? I say yes. I would then expect them to return it to the proper owner.
![]()
Marthian
April 14, 2011 at 10:04am
one of the few times I will ever be ok with the government being involved with the internet. *was not a victim though, so didn't affect me.*
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.


















