Facebook Attempts to Outwit Google+ Circles with 'Smart' Friends Filter
It's starting to become clear why Mark Zuckerberg joined Google+ and it's not because he's grown tired of his own social network. He wants to know the competition, as in Keep your friends close and your enemies closer, and maybe learn a thing or three in the process. Zuckerberg seems to have learned that Google+'s social Circles rock and Facebook's friend lists could use a bit of work, so Mr. Zuckerberg and company went to work improving things.
Facebook announced the change to its friend lists in a blog post, noting that "lists have existed for several years, but you've told us how time-consuming it is to organize lists for different parts of your life and keep them up to date." Translation: "Our friend lists suck, hardly anyone's using them, so we're going to make it easier."
It starts with "Smart lists." These are intelligent lists that create themselves and keep up-to-date without any user intervention. There will be four Smart lists to start, including Work, School, Family, and City. An algorithm analyzes your friends' profiles and puts them in the appropriate lists, assuming you choose to use them (they are still optional, after all). If you do, you can always go in and manually tweak your lists, just in case you don't want Bob from accounting to know what you and your co-workers were up to over the weekend.
In addition to these Smart lists, Facebook is also introducing Close Friends and Acquaintances lists, which you'll update manually. These are self-explanatory Circles lists, though it's worth mentioning that you'll receive less updates from people you put in your Acquaintances bubble, while still being notified of "important things they post -- like when they get married or move to a new city -- so you don't lose touch completely."
Finally, Facebook is implementing a feature called Better Suggestions. What this means is Facebook will provide suggestions for all your friend lists, and when you add someone as a friend or confirm a friend request, you'll have the option right then and there of adding them to an existing list.
Are you looking forward to the changes, or have you moved on to Google+ and don't plan on looking back?
Image Credit: Facebook
Comments
Comments are closed on this article
![]()
blindhorizon
September 14, 2011 at 8:31am
while i dont agree or disagree with any of the other posts i have to say the the Friends part of Facebook has been there for about 6 months or more i have been using it. Mind you its almost imposible to change who is on it cuz like stradric said "unorganized mess of complexity" and i have to agree, but i thought i would mentin that they have had that feature for quite some time now.
![]()
stradric
September 14, 2011 at 7:28am
It's still shit. This feature is such a hack. The only thing they're doing is automatically creating the lists for you, but you're still going to have to go through them manually and prune out the "friends" that the algorithm got wrong.
G+ was designed from the get-go around Circles. One circle is called "friends". Facebook on the other hand was designed around a "friends list", but most of the people on people's "friends list" aren't actually their friends. They're just people they may have once known, currently know, currently are friends with or currently stalking.
Not only that, but finding where to edit the Lists in Facebook is still a frustrating experience. In G+, it's right in your face and core to the UI.
There's also something to be said about the fact that Facebook, once the innovator, is now playing catch up. They've been hacking features into their UI for so long, that it has become such an unorganized mess of complexity. G+ keeps it simple, and if they continue to do that, they will eventually overcome Facebook.
![]()
Supall
September 14, 2011 at 5:57am
You can't get rid of Facebook. For now, I use G+ all the time and (amazingly) mostly for the non-intrusive games and the Sparks feed. Most of my friends aren't on G+ so I have to keep my Facebook page, but I enjoy the community on it right now (people with a head on their shoulders and aren't spamming the news feed with "OMG! My butt is so toned right now! [pic]". So is Facebook's changes something to write home about? I don't know. I really don't care anymore what Facebook does so long as it doesn't change my privacy settings.
![]()
spokenwordd
September 14, 2011 at 11:07am
There was once a time that you could have said "You can't get rid of MySpace". Who would have thought back in 2007 that Facebook would be the reigning King and Myspace would be a shell? I don't believe any social network has a guaranteed life tenure.
In my opinion Myspace was a better product had greater privacy and control and I just had a better time on it. After a short stint on Facebook I refuse to use it for many of the usual reasons. Namely the drama of seperating certain communications from groups of people that are all assumed to be my "friends".
Google + is far from perfect but I can definitely say I enjoy it and look forward to a public release to see if it'll draw me back to social media as a time expenditure.
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.


















