Chevy Volt Rated at 93 MPG (on Battery)

20

Comments

Comments are closed on this article

avatar

bart3385

Must be the leaking gas tank.

Special built-in feature. The gas tank leaks 0.01075 gal per mile (or 43 ml per mile) for the first 35 miles. Which translates to a whopping 93 miles per gallon of leaked fuel! Not bad. Very not bad.

avatar

ermpc

If on battery alone (all electric), then there is zero gallons used, therefore will be infinite MPGs

avatar

AndyYankee17

you could take the tesla and put a 50 CC engine with a 1 ounce fuel cell in it and get probably a couple thousand miles to the gallon. it's all pretty deceptive math

avatar

sniggler

This is GM's way of holding on to every last drop of gas until it's gone. Electric / hybrid vehicles have been around since the late 70's. They have been continuously and purposely stifled by big auto and oil companies, who are in bed with each other.

This product is too late to be revolutionary. Rather, this is Chevy's way of 'dipping their toes' into the electric market, via a hybrid vehicle which Toyota has already had on the market for the past 5 years (Prius Hybrid).

They will continue to milk gas and oil until it's completely gone. It's just that consumers are now more aware than ever of depleting fuel resources, so we are going to see more and more of these 'hybrid electric' vehicles in between gas-powered and full-electric / other vehicles in the future. Think of it as a step in between.

avatar

nadako

35 + 37 = 72 not 60....

avatar

bart3385

Actually, it should be a combined rate of 39.18 mpg.

First leg of the trip of 35 miles, at 93 miles per gal, translates to 0.3763 gals consumed. (Theoretically. I don't know how a battery-only trip can even consume gasoline!)

Second leg of the trip of 344 miles, at 37 mpg, translates to 9.2973 gals consumed.

Add them up. You get 381 miles trip, using 9.6736 gals of gasoline. So that's gonna be around 39.38 mpg. Or approximately 39.18 mpg, if you don't round off all the values.

i wonder how the "60 mpg" was derived.

avatar

AndyYankee17

the gasoline engine is a 74 hp 1.4 l L4 that runs on premium fuel. Why wouldn't they use diesel? isn't that recognized as being a lot more fuel efficient? plus it makes more torque and turns slower so there's less wear and tear. must be something about weight? turbos are too heavy?

avatar

zodi

Diesel isn't seen as a a green alternative over here. The other thing is an L4 getting 37MPG that ain't all that great.

avatar

Mighty BOB!

Wired gets a bit more into the numbers:

http://www.wired.com/autopia/2010/11/chevy-volt-gets-equivalent-of-93-mpg-but/

avatar

tacobell1

How dare you give us this great information. Why is everyone complaining. I would like one of these cars. How Much?

avatar

brick586

The gas engine is not to run the car but to charge the battery.  The battery is still propelling the car not the engine.

avatar

vistageek

Would you guys mind explaining that weighted average math to us?

avatar

Trooper_One

I always read these postings of gas mileage with a grain of salt - they always overstate their efficiencies and the actual mileage is significantly lower.

There should be some regulations that oversee these advertisings (just like overstating the capabilities of a LCD monitors).

 

avatar

AndyYankee17

EPA does the does the testing and they supposedly have no bias. I personally think the way they test them emphasizes regen braking more than regular driving actually does.

 

I think this might prove interesting, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKTOyiKLARk

avatar

nmanguy

How did you get 60 MPG? The most I could could muster up is 41 MPG using that 37 mpg for 344, and 0 mpg for 35.

 

Oops, nevermind, I forgot about the regen brakes.

avatar

ak

Bad post

avatar

AndyYankee17

MPG equivalent is quite deceptive, for one thing how is it measure? cost? 1 gallon of gasoline get's you 25 miles and costs $3, 1 kwh of electricity gets you x miles and costs so much? knowing the epa it's probably carbon equivalents and even that can vary based on where you live. If live in WV that's going to release more CO2 than living in las vegas (WV would most likely be coal fired, nevada would be hydro).

avatar

stradric

The total range is farther than my Accord and the gas-only fuel economy is better as well.  So either way you look at it, it's a win.  Provided I could plug the car in while at work, I would never need to use the gas recharge since my commute is only 24 miles.  The question is, how long does it take to recharge from 120v?

avatar

ak

What are you driving an accord from the 70s? If you can't even get 350 miles out of your accord, with your driving, you are never going to get the EPA listed 37 MPG. And you are for sure not going to get 35 miles on the battery with hard acceleration and high speeds. I have an accord and get more than 400 miles and the newer versions have larger tanks and can get past 500 miles.

avatar

stradric

My accord has a 12 gallon tank.  I get about 25-28 mpg.

Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook

Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.

Login with Facebook
Log in using Facebook to share comments and articles easily with your Facebook feed.