CEO Points The Finger At Intel As Nvidia Withdraws From PC Chips
It’s not a big secret that Nvidia’s has been slowly pulling out of the PC chipset market for a while now: a quick Google search shows results for “Nvidia exit chipset business” as far back as 2008. Some people thought that the company would get back into the swing of things after signing a patent cross-licensing agreement with Intel back in January, ending a long and bitter legal battle. Nope, Nvidia CEO Jen-Hsun Huang told a group of investors this week. Nvidia’s done with PC chipsets for good, and Intel’s the one to blame.
"We've been exiting that business for quite a famous reason, because of a dispute with Intel. They preferred that we weren't in that business," Huang said at the Kaufman Brothers Investor Conference this week. "Although it was a large business opportunity for us, staying in it was really impossible considering their displeasure for it."
Computerworld reports that the company plans on circling the wagons around the mobile chip and graphics card segments of its business. Nvidia’s Tegra line has proven a smash hit with mobile devices, and the new quad-core Kal-El is due to roll into tablets by the end of the year. The company also wants to gain more penetration with its GPUs in the server and supercomputer fields.
Nvidia still plans on working with Intel in its quest to develop more powerful graphics solutions for PC users, but has no plans on moving back into computer chipsets whatsoever. "We're going to stay out of the basic PC market, we're not going to compete with Intel," Huang said.
Comments
Comments are closed on this article
![]()
Zachary K.
September 11, 2011 at 10:33pm
So no more ION? I guess I have no reason to stick with intel anymore.
![]()
warptek2010
September 09, 2011 at 10:07pm
If Nvidia really wanted to it could get into the CPU/APU business and compete with a really good dynamic part which could lead right back to making their own chipsets for their own part. To stick it to Intel even harder, make the die fit an AM3+ socket. A three way between Intel, AMD and Nvidia could drive a muchly needed price war.
![]()
d3v
September 11, 2011 at 3:57am
Sounds like a nice idea but I doubt AMD would like that. Most likely they would sue Nvidia.
If Nvidia wants to get into the x86 game it will have to create its own platform. But why would it want to do that? Much more money to be made in the mobile sphere.
![]()
don2041
September 09, 2011 at 12:25pm
Scared off of a large buisiness oppertunity because of intels displeasure of it. What kind of a buisiness runs from buisiness just because someone else doent like it? Something stinks here.
![]()
d3v
September 11, 2011 at 3:52am
I am sure it was more than just words. For Nvidia to make chipsets for an Intel platform it obviously needs the cooperation of intel. Nvidia can't make chipsets if intel decides not to cooperate.
![]()
Holly Golightly
September 09, 2011 at 11:35am
Man, Intel is messed up. More of a good reason to side with AMD.
![]()
warptek2010
September 09, 2011 at 10:10pm
You said that right. I know Intel chips are superior in the floating point, multithread and memory bandwidth areas but I am and still remain an AMD guy. Up until recently I always stayed with Nvidia graphics cards but on my latest build I went with an AMD Radeon and paired it with the 1100T 6 core and my system is beautiful which makes me one happy customer. Take that in your smug face Intel.
BTW: I could give a shit less about benchmarks in this or that. As long as my system is fast and responsive (which it is) I am happy.
![]()
Wingzero_x
September 10, 2011 at 4:14am
Thank you! Too many people pay too much attention to benchmark stats that are impercievable in the first place.
![]()
tetlecie
September 10, 2011 at 7:45am
manufacteres use figures to make us cough up our hard earn cash.... i have a simple gaming pc Amd Phenom 11 quad core 2.4 ghz and a 460 gtx with 4gb ddr3 cant find a game i cant play on highest options yet except crysis 2 latest patch which most people do not have a system to play it anyway... this system cost me under 600.00 and that FPS stuff is overrated
![]()
Wingzero_x
September 10, 2011 at 10:29am
I have a system I'm working on current that I'm having to use a stand in processor an AMD Phenom IIx2 555. I also have an intel system based on the socket 1156 i7-875K, and before that I had a system based on the socket 1366 i7-920. And while some tasks certainly are different, for the most part I can't tell the difference. Perhaps I remember when computers were really slow.
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.

















