engine speed is nothing without the music

Submitted by Elucidate on Sun, 04/12/2009 - 9:38am

Like i-Jedi said, the fastest engine in the world means nothing if supporting software is minimal or non-existent. 

If you liked the Elegant Universe by Brian Greene, you'll love the Endless Universe- Beyond the big bang theory by Paul Steinhardt and Neil Turok.

Login or register to post comments

 To be honest, I have never

Submitted by Mikey1091 on Sat, 04/11/2009 - 3:40pm

 To be honest, I have never trusted Intel, and I never will.  So because I don't trust them now, there's no way I'm going to use an OS they they're developing for use on THEIR processors.  If it were going to be avaiable for AMD processors too, then maybe, just MAYBE I'd try it.  I'm not willing to ditch an OS that I like just because it takes 45 seconds to get to the user login screen on Vista.  I have also used PCLinuxOS, and the boot time is pretty much the same.  I'll try an OS with a 2 second boot time so long as Intel isn't the one making it, but since they are, Intel can kiss my great big fat american (insert insulting word of choice here) all the way to the moon for all I care.

 

Cheap Web Hosting from Nova Internet Services!  http://www.novaservices.biz/

Login or register to post comments

Two second boot time would

Submitted by MAXPCreader07 on Fri, 04/10/2009 - 5:22pm

Two second boot time would be great, though it won't make me use Moblin. Now if Ubuntu (and derivatives) could get a faster boot then were talking.

Login or register to post comments

If the software is there to

Submitted by I Jedi on Fri, 04/10/2009 - 4:50pm

If the software is there to back the operating system and allow users tons of choices, then I definitely think there is potential. 

Login or register to post comments

It's actually a version of

Submitted by Vadi on Fri, 04/10/2009 - 4:18pm

It's actually a version of Linux.

Chances are, you won't be playing COD4 even on a win7 netbook either though.

Login or register to post comments

I think it's great for

Submitted by brainwins on Fri, 04/10/2009 - 3:45pm

I think it's great for netbooks. But then again, that story saying Windows is the biggest OS on netbooks shows that people don't really feel like trying a new OS.

Login or register to post comments

I use ubuntu since it boots

Submitted by teh 1337 haxxor on Fri, 04/10/2009 - 2:51pm

I use ubuntu since it boots 5 times faster than vista, and is more reliable. The only time i use vista anymore is if i'm playing games. I'd love to have a 2 second OS on any computer. I think dual boot is the best solution, even for netbooks.

Login or register to post comments

maybe if i was using the

Submitted by Rob86 on Fri, 04/10/2009 - 1:21pm

maybe if i was using the computer for something other then gaming otherwise i wouldn't see a reason to.

 

Login or register to post comments

Pssh

Submitted by habuza on Fri, 04/10/2009 - 1:13pm

Ditch all my games for a 2 second boot time when my windows box boots in 15 and I can play all my games? Moblin can tongueshovel my stinkditch, so can Intel for that matter.

Login or register to post comments