Bus Drivers Banned from Texting and Driving, Truckers Too
It's bad enough trying to dodge sports cars and sedans drifting into opposing lanes because the driver's busy firing off a text message, but try going up against a bus or 18-wheeler and let us know how that plays out. That's not something we ever want to encounter, nor does the Department of Transportation like the idea, who has now made it illegal for bus drivers and truckers to pound out a message on their cellphone rather than pay attention to the road.
"We want the drivers of big rigs and buses and those who share the roads with them to be safe," said Ray LaHood, Transportation Secretary. "This is an important safety step and we will be taking more to eliminate the threat of distracted driving."
Big wheeled drivers caught defying the new law will face a fine of up to $2,750, plus possible jail time if an accident occurs.
It's unclear how many truck and bus accidents are caused by texting, but according to the National Safety Council, some 200,000 crashes of all types on U.S. roads are direct results text messaging. The practice is banned in almost half the U.S. states.
![]()
tennessee01tacoma
January 28, 2010 at 8:23am
Here is my problem with this law, nothing is going to be done about people eating, lighting cigarettes, yelling at their kids, or women putting on makeup while driving. I agree that texting while driving is dangerous and try not to as much as possible. I want to pose one question, what about the police officers with a radio, laptop, cellphone, and radar/laser. Ya sure they have to do some driver training but they are human none the less and definitely not above the law. Im not trying to be rebelious or disrespectful Im a firefighter myself. When we have a call the driver drives only and the guy in the passenger seat works the lights sirens and radio which is crazy enough without having to drive.
Jerry
![]()
lostcause64
January 27, 2010 at 1:08pm
In all honesty, I don't have a problem with this new law, but it's just another example of the double standards set for professional drivers vs the rest of the traffic. I'm IT now, but in the 90's I was an over the road truck driver, running thru 48 states and Canada. Something as serious as distracted driving, no matter the weight of the vehicle, is the same as driving while impaired or drunk. People end up just as dead when hit by a 2 ton car or a 40 ton truck. Just like a plane crash, because it doesn't happen as often as it does with a car, it's bigger news. Have you ever had to take a roadside drug test? In some states, truckers do. Like your radar/laser detector? In some places, truckers go to jail for having one whether it's hooked up or not. Ever wonder why those big double skidmarks happen? In too many cases, it's because trucks are restricted to the right lane for some fool to go racing up and jump in front of the truck, then slam on the brakes, forcing the truck to do anything but hit that car if possible, including get themselves killed, all because there might be a kid in the backseat of that car that doesn't deserve to die because they have no control over the idiot they are riding with. Now, I don't disagree with most of the stricter laws and I'm not saying all professional drivers are angels in any way, but most drivers out there will do anything to avoid an accident and keep other drivers safe. Enforcement issues aside, those more restrictive laws should be in place for anyone driving, not just targeting drivers that have to be professionals every second they are behind the wheel and held to a higher standard than everyone else. If you really want to make the roads safer with new laws, how about requiring every person that is getting or renewing their license to spend 2-4 hours in the passenger seat of an 18 wheeler while driving around town. You'd be amazed what you see happening around you, and in some cases to you, from up there. You'd also get a new respect for what a professional driver has to go thru every day while just trying to make a living.
John
Have you ever wondered why intelligence can normally be found in an individual, but runs screaming in terror from a group? Though, there are exceptions...
![]()
lunchbox73
January 27, 2010 at 12:43pm
As a libertarian I cringe at how ban-happy our society is becoming. Once again, we're trying to protect people from their own stupidity. How soon before a ban on eating in the car? Do you know how distracting a really messy cheeseburger is?
![]()
bathtbgin
January 27, 2010 at 12:59pm
this ban has nothing to do with protecting the driver from hurting him/herself while texting, its about protecting everyone else on the road.
![]()
popstop785
January 27, 2010 at 12:23pm
Agreed, they should have done that a long time ago. Trucking and bus driving is their job. While they are on the job they should not be texting anyways. And it is a safety risk... a person behind the wheel of such a large vehicle should keep their eyes on the road at all times (every driver should anyways) because that vehicle could cause a lot of damage to a lot of people and things if an accident happens.
![]()
Trooper_One
January 27, 2010 at 11:47am
Should've done that a long time ago... while at it, bus drivers and others in the same group shouldn't be allowed to read books, newspapers, or do sudoku puzzles.
![]()
nekollx
January 27, 2010 at 11:50am
Fair enough as long as they can still listen to their mp3. You have to remember their on the road non-stop for upwards of 8 hours, hell bus drivers don't even get a official Lunch or bathroom break (they have to do it durring layovers and shift changes)
They need something to keep them sane.
------------------------------
Coming soon to Lulu.com --Tokusatsu Heroes--
Five teenagers, one alien ghost, a robot, and the fate of the world.
![]()
darkstar09
January 27, 2010 at 11:41am
They know that they can't catch everyone so they step up the punishment for the ones that they CAN catch. $80 fine and 20 demerit points. (100 demerit points = loss of licence and points aren't removed for 3 years)
![]()
1337Goose
January 27, 2010 at 10:04am
Operating a mobile handheld device while behind the wheel is already banned here in Ontario, Canada.
~Goose
![]()
I Jedi
January 27, 2010 at 9:25am
I'm sorry, but I truly do not see the problem here, does anybody else? It's called multi-tasking here, people. If you cannot due it then due not try it... PERIOD. Oh, and for all you consious-individuals out there, it's always best never to text whilst driving...
![]()
jgrimoldy
January 27, 2010 at 10:10am
The only problem I see is a difficulty in enforcing this. I AGREE strenuously with the idea of attaching outrageous fines to truckers and bus drivers that text and drive. How do you enforce this though? Law enforcement cruisers are far too low to be able to see truckers texting and driving. If one gets into an accident while texting, how do you PROVE that they were texting when the accident happened?
![]()
Cruzg10
January 27, 2010 at 10:33am
They get records for your cell phone and they check it against the texts and phone calls made around the same timeframe as the accident. well here in california they do.
![]()
I Jedi
January 27, 2010 at 10:20am
I have ended up getting away so many timse on the road that I should of lost my license to drive by now. Point and being, this law was meant to scare people into not doing it. There is no great way to enforce this. The only way you'll ever be able to do this is if someone sees it, or if the driver admits guilt to doing this. Now, I do think it is stupid to text whilst driving. I can't do it, but I know people out there that can. For the majority of us, though, this is not a great idea. Taking your eyes off of the road for even 5 seconds can cause an accident.
![]()
jgrimoldy
January 27, 2010 at 11:36am
At 60 MPH, you go 88 feet every second. In 5 seconds, you go 440 feet, or close to 1 and 1/2 football field lengths. It's terrifying to think of covering that kind of distance with eyes off the road.
![]()
nekollx
January 27, 2010 at 11:41am
but most busses don't travel 60mph, ok maybe for a few seconds here and there but with stops ever block or so its more like 20-30
------------------------------
Coming soon to Lulu.com --Tokusatsu Heroes--
Five teenagers, one alien ghost, a robot, and the fate of the world.
![]()
I Jedi
January 27, 2010 at 8:12pm
It's still terribly more dangerous, imo, for a bus/truck driver to take their eyes off of the road for more than 5 seconds, ESPECIALLY in the city... On the highway, you're moving fast, but every tends to keep a good distance from one another. In the city, you got to watch out for parked cars moving, idiots crossing the street, people turning lanes constantly, and much, much more. I still stand by my arguement that if you can't multi-task, don't do it. It's still stupid to text while driving, but we've all done it at one point or another, and people will continue to do it, rather a stupid law says they can or cannot.
![]()
Digital-Storm
January 28, 2010 at 4:40am
I'm sorry, but I truly do not see the problem here, does anybody else?
It's called multi-tasking here, people. If you cannot due it then due
not try it... PERIOD. Oh, and for all you consious-individuals out
there, it's always best never to text whilst driving...
Due. Owed and payable immediately or on demand; "payment is due"
Please use the word "do" next time.
Besides, no one should be texting while driving, regardless if they can multitask or not. There are people that can multitask like crazy and text while driving, but eventually, they do get into an accident and injure/kill others.
![]()
jgrimoldy
January 27, 2010 at 12:06pm
Perhaps intra-city buses rarely go that fast. Greyhound buses as well as countless other tour and chartered buses roam the highways on a regular basis.

















