British Teachers Afraid WiFi Is Sterilizing Children

6

Comments

+ Add a Comment
avatar

DarrenGantz

I have never heard such nonsense until now! I work in the radiation domain and the Wi-Fi is the least of our worries at this moment ( nothing that a little pre seed lubricant can't fix ). We should worry more about the radiations that our own sun produces! If we look at the studies we can see that copulation is bad; why don't the ATL do something about that?

avatar

NAYRhyno

Nice link Ogre.  The best part for those to lazy to click:

Photons of visible light carry more energy than
microwaves and bombard us much more frequently than microwaves from such
things as cell phones or wireless networks.

 

And that is visible light.  Not UV, which are much higher energy (thus the link to melenoma)

avatar

ogremustcrush

As far as I know there hasn't been any conclusive evidence supporting the assertion that low-power low-freqency electromagntic radiation has any significant effect on biological systems. Considering that we are all drowning in radiation from many more sources than wi-fi and cell phones, I wouldn't be too concerned about those particular cases. I have to wonder if any of the teachers who are supporting this stuff ever go tanning, as long term exposure to UV radiation(high frequency electromagnetic) is harmful, and has quite a bit of evidence to back that up.

Funny though, when I was in high school I set up a high power wi-fi amp and high db antenna for the computer teacher. I sat right next to it. 

Here is a really good link on the safety of electromagnetic radiation. http://skepdic.com/emf.html . One thing to look out for is most of the media coverage of "radiation" of any sort is purely looking to drum up controversy, and tends to give creedence to whatever group is causing a fuss instead of the general scientific consensus. An important thing to note is the link above acutally has citations, which few news stories do for any of the studies they are writing about. 

avatar

DBsantos77

I believe this. I CANNOT have my laptop on my lap because I get a really bad pain "down there" and it hurts like a mofo, so I put it on a counter-top or hard object far away from my "jewels" Haha.

avatar

devin3627

It's an fact that 1 feet away a laptops wifi transmitter is dangerous. The general public is sheep, they only understand what their eyes can see. 

avatar

unixfool

You're probably wearing a tin hat and are naked (like that guy in the Dukes of Hazzard movie).

Where is this fact that you've mentioned?  Half the world would be sterile if that were the case.  As it is now, all I have to do, instead of getting a vasectomy, is to just use my laptop in my lap and the deed is done?

Seriously, the power that wifi devices put out is nothing compared to things such as HAM equipment.  When I was in Desert Storm, there was this HUGE radio dish that was supposed to be off-limits and you were not supposed to walk within 20 feet of the front of it.  We used to put our meals on it so that they would heat up so that we could have warm meals.  Now that's power.  Some antennas burn you if you touch them when someone is transmitting.  802.11 cards don't even compare.  Hell, with 3 kids, I wish I were sterile right now...that's not the case, though (at least 4 yrs ago, it wasn't, because I've a 3 yr old boy).

Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook

Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.

Login with Facebook
Log in using Facebook to share comments and articles easily with your Facebook feed.