Biostar's TA990FXE Motherboard Brings Out the Big Guns
Biostar has been trying to reinvent itself as an enthusiast brand, a hard sell considering most seasoned vets have a hard time shaking the notion that Biostar's focus is squarely on the budget buyer. The truth of the matter is Biostar holds several overclocking records under its belt, and it's because of high end boards like the new TA990FXE.
In case there was any doubt, Biostar comes out and says it's targeting "the most demanding overclockers and gamers" with its new board. The appropriately named TA990FXE is based on AMD's 990FX chipset. It supports all socket AM3+ processors, including AMD's upcoming Bulldozer chips.
Four DDR3 DIMM slots support up to 16GB of dual-channel DDR3-2000MHz memory. There are three PCi-E x16 2.0 slots and Biostar says the TA990FXE is one of the few boards to support a x16, x16, x4 configuration. Other features include five SATA 6Gbps ports with support for RAID 0/1/5/10, three USB 3.0 ports, six USB 2.0 ports, FireWire, GbE LAN, and 8-channel audio. There's also an included bracket that adds a serial port and external eSATA connector.
Of interest to overclockers are all solid capacitors, hardware debugging with LED lights, and a handful of overclocking utilities.
No word on price or availability.
Image Credit: Biostar
Comments
Comments are closed on this article
![]()
Tonyb1980
October 03, 2011 at 5:45pm
If it had more SATA ports id be saying put this on my xmas wish list. BUT .... 5 ports isnt quite enough for my liking im odd i like a board with at least 8 ports. Now the ASUS 990FX that in my books is %100 geek pron !
![]()
misha573
September 29, 2011 at 9:32am
MaxPC, put it in the hurt locker with other 990FX boards from the usual suspects (MSI, ASUS, Gigabyte, etc.). If they want enthusiast cred then folks gotta hurt 'em to see if they stand up!
![]()
big_montana
September 29, 2011 at 8:02am
What I do not understand, is why board manufacturers insist on mixing USB 2 and 3. Go with one or the other, as it makes absolutely no sense to include both as USB 3is backward compatible.
![]()
bautrey
September 30, 2011 at 2:44am
It wouldn't be cost effective to have 10 USB 3.0 ports nor practical because your not likely to have more than 2 usb 3.0 devices.
![]()
Paul_Lilly
September 29, 2011 at 8:09am
Blame it on lack of native support. Today's chipsets only support USB 2.0, so that's what we're stuck with. When you see USB 3.0 ports, they're add-ons courtesy of third-party chips from the likes of NEC, Marvell, and others.
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.


















