Asus Plans Low-Cost, Full Color E-book
Posted 09/07/09 at 12:27:54 PM by Paul Lilly
More details have started to emerge regarding Asus' rumored e-book reader, and what we're finding out could spell bad news for Amazon and Sony. According to the Times Online UK, Asus' version is coming soon and will be the world's cheapest digital reader, undercutting the competition without skimping on features.
Citing a spokesperson for Asus in the UK, the upcoming e-book reader will sport a hinged spine so that it more closely emulates the experience of reading a book. Users will be able to see text on one screen while surfing willy nilly on the web over on the other. It's also possible that one of the screens may end up with a virtual keyboard. Perhaps best of all, Asus has decided to ditch a monochrome display in favor of full-color.
According to the report, Asus said it is considering a budget and premium version, the differences of which have yet to be determined. Either way, look for at least one Asus-branded e-book reader to surface later this year for around $150.

Image Credit: bpsobsessed.com
comic reader
Submitted by Zombie30000 on Tue, 09/08/2009 - 3:42am
Yep, I'm one of them. I lovez me some .cbz. I'll tell you what though, a portrait mode 24" monitor is pretty amazing reading surface while I wait for a color eInk reader.
This is a horrible form factor.
Submitted by ddimick on Mon, 09/07/2009 - 8:39pm
Seriously, this is only appealing if you've never used an eBook reader before. A few things to consider:
1) eInk is on every single decent eBook reader for a reason, and two of those reasons are eyestrain and glare. There is no backlight on eInk screens and they honestly look pretty much just like paper. Go check one out at a Sony store or something. If you've never seen one before you might just think the display is a mockup. It looks that good. Since there is no backlight, the brighter it is where you're reading, the better the screen looks. Color eInk is coming for those that like to read comic books, but this device won't have it at the price point named.
2) The folding design sucks. It's fine with a paperback since it's light enough to be held in one hand anyway, but this probably won't be able to be comfortably held in only one hand. Try using it to read on a plane for four or five hours and see how much you like it then.
3) Battery life. Another reason decent eBook readers use eInk screens is because they literally only consume power when a page is changed. Once the screen is displaying a page, no power is required to keep the text displayed. Powering a big, beautiful _backlit_ color display is expensive in terms of battery, and that means expensive in terms of weight. See point #2.
Book vs. Ebook
Submitted by Scapegoat on Mon, 09/07/2009 - 6:53pm
Meh. I'm still a "I like holding the actual book" kinda guy, but if I were (and hopefully I will be) a book worm, this is what I would be holding out for: a two-pages-at-a-time ereader with color. I support it. Although ebooks I havwe found are not much cheaper than the actual book....
Translation: it will run for
Submitted by Vegan on Mon, 09/07/2009 - 1:08pm
Translation: it will run for an hour before the battery runs out.
Feature
Review
Feature
Feature
Feature






