Are Notebook Manufacturers Unhappy With The Ultrabook's $1000 Price Tag?
Intel's pumped about its Ultrabook concept. How pumped? So pumped that earlier this week, the company created a $300 million fund to help spur on the development of the powerful, low weight, long lasting laptops. The companies that are actually making the Ultrabooks, though, are apparently a little less enthused. You see, Intel wants companies to sell Ultrabooks for less than $1,000 – probably to make them competitive with the MacBook Air. That number's making a few manufacturers shift uneasily in their seats.
Computer makers estimate they'll need to spend $700 on materials alone for an 11.6-inch Ultrabook, DigiTimes reported today. At $1,000 retail, that doesn't leave much meat on the bone after other costs, like marketing and distribution, are factored in. DigiTimes' (as always) anonymous sources said that the magic $1k number would be much easier to swallow if Intel would sell Ultrabook-bound CPUs to OEMs at a greater discount. The same unnamed sources say some notebook makers want Intel to hand out a $100 marketing subsidy for each Ultrabook sold.
While these rumors align with some others that we've heard recently, it's always good to take anonymous sources with a grain of salt, especially when the same DigiTimes article says that Asus, Acer and Lenovo all plan on releasing sub-$1,000 Ultrabooks by the end of the year.
Comments
Comments are closed on this article
![]()
livebriand
August 14, 2011 at 2:04pm
No thanks. I can get a stupid MBA 13" or, at a fairly similar price, a Thinkpad that's built like a tank and has more power.
![]()
rorrr
August 12, 2011 at 10:27pm
those PC manufacturers are hardly making any money now with their current pricing schemes. how many people actually buy brand new high-end laptops at full price? now, ask yourself how many people buy brand new Apple laptops at full price.
these manufacturers are constantly offering sales with $100-$400 dollar discounts. in contrast, Apple gives a $50 discount, and that's only for students. lol.
bottom line is, consumers love Apple hardware. they love the Macbook Air. most PC makers are already shamelessy copying Apple's design aesthetic. if they want Apple to stop eating into their collective PC market share, then they have to improve the quality of their hardware *and* compete on price.
![]()
win7fanboi
August 14, 2011 at 2:10pm
aesthetics alone mean zilch. You are comparing <1% market share product with something that everyone uses.
![]()
Toggi3
August 15, 2011 at 8:27pm
around 7% worldwide, around 13% in the USA, not <1%. Just saying, wrong. :p
![]()
big_montana
August 12, 2011 at 6:56pm
Lenovo, Asus, and Acer are capable of producing sub $1,000 high performance laptops now, and are doing so. Just look at their product lines and you can get a cor i5, 320GB 7200 RPM HDD, 14.1" LED, Dual band WiFi, HD Web Cam, noise cancelling stereo mic, bio metrics, 8GB Ram, for less than $900 now from Lenovo.
![]()
Peanut Fox
August 14, 2011 at 12:11am
No doubt those are great performers, but they don't compete with the Mac Book Air in terms of size. My guess is that Intel doesn't want to be left behind as ARM continually grows in the small portable device sector. With Windows 8 being ARM compatible Intel really wants a small, light, powerful, as well as affordable device that they can offer their processors and chipset in.
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.


















