AMD Taking a Wait-and-See Approach to Tablets
ARM thinks it will be powering half of all tablets (if not the vast majority of them) by 2011, while Intel already has a processor roadmap in place for this emerging market. And what about AMD? Well, they're not as gung-ho as the other major chip makers, and instead will wait until market demand picks up, says Rich Bergman, AMD senior vice president and general manager of Products Group.
Is anyone else feeling a sense of déjà vu here? This is essentially the same approach the No. 2 chip maker took with the netbook market, and now that it's clear netbooks are here to stay, AMD is playing a losing game of catch-up with Intel whose Atom platform has become synonymous with netbooks.
The irony here is that AMD says it will focus on its Bobcat processor for netbooks for 2011. Given that netbooks aren't going anywhere, that's not a bad strategy, but ignoring tablets until Intel and ARM have a stranglehold on the market could have AMD in this same position 1-2 years down the line. In less than two months, Apple has already sold over 2 million iPads, and there are a flurry of competing tablets at the ready that will launch before the end of the year. It's pretty clear that tablets are the next big thing in computing, the only question is how long will it take AMD to realize this, and will it be too late when they do?

Image Credit: AMD
Comments
Comments are closed on this article
![]()
VSClax
June 04, 2010 at 1:51pm
"It's pretty clear that tablets are the next big thing in computing"
Clear to who????
The only thing that is clear to me is that 2 million Apple fanboys went out and spent a stupid amount of money on a stupid product. There aren't any other serious tablets currently out that I can think of, and anything thats in the pipe is just hype with no proof that it will succeed. There is no REAL evidence that tablets will take off. Say AMD is losing out all you want but if and when the tablet phase passes and AMD hasn't dumped millions into R&D, they will be millions richer.
![]()
Neufeldt2002
June 04, 2010 at 1:03pm
What this story says to me is that AMD doesn't have the deep pockets that the others have. They probably would very much like to get in the game, but the funds aren't there yet. Historically this is typical of AMD, right back to the CPU wars of old.
![]()
Nailer669
June 04, 2010 at 1:08pm
You gotta pay to play, and if you don't have deep pockets, your stuck playing the penny slots instead of the high-stakes Texas Hold 'em.
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.

















