AMD Closes Out 2010 with $6.49 Billion in Revenue
Overall one would have to say it was a fairly good year for AMD, who despite still trailing Intel for the performance crown, still managed to post $6.49 billion in revenue for the year ended December 25, 2010, the chip maker announced on Thursday. Revenue was pretty evenly divided up (flat) between quarters, with AMD posting $1.62 billion in Q3 and $1.65 billion in Q4.
"AMD enters 2011 with significant momentum, amplified by the successful launch of our first Fusion APUs," said Thomas Seifert, CFO and Interim CEO. "I am confident we can drive profitable growth based on the strength of new products we will bring to market. Our customers recognize that Fusion APUs are at the core of delivering the world's most vivid digital experience."
The numbers were just high enough to beat out Wall Street estimates, which expected earnings of 11 cents on revenue of $1.63 billion for the fourth quarter.
Where AMD goes from here is up for debate. Following a disagreement between AMD's board and longtime CEO Dirk Meyers over the chip maker's mobile strategy (or lack thereof), Meyer recently stepped down in what the two sides described as a "mutual agreement."

Comments
Comments are closed on this article
![]()
fellowleo
January 22, 2011 at 9:33am
Does this $6.49B include the $1.25B they settled with Intel from $2009? If so, that's 20% of the revenue just from haggling lawyers.
![]()
Engelsstaub
January 21, 2011 at 11:28am
"...so their business model and targeted market is what makes them get such a good amount of revenue."
Well that and the fact that they choke Intel for reparations like the French did the Weimar Republic :P
I'm just playing. That's a good point: AMD does have a segment of the market that matters to many. People don't want to pay a grand for the newest i7 (...especially when it will be 300 bucks in six months.) They want decent performance at a reasonable price-point. AMD usually delivers on that. I have an i7 but feel that AMD deserves the credit where it's due.
![]()
Peanut Fox
January 22, 2011 at 5:14pm
....but the newest i7 is 300 bucks right now, and smacks pretty much anything all the way up to Intel's six core part.
![]()
THE_REAL_MAVERICK
January 21, 2011 at 9:00am
AMD has a good business model. Most PC users and gamers for that matter, dont always have to have the best performance out there. Sure intel smacks any AMD processor and the ATI cards are now trailing in benchmarks to Nvidias top tier. But the ATI cards were superior just 5 months ago, so they really had better cards all year round over Nvidia. But the point for AMD is price for performance. AMD will always win in this round. I mean, they have a 6 core processor for $200. AMAZING! Any of their products play games at their fullest, so their business model and targeted market is what makes them get such a good amount of revenue. Another thing to consider is that they are helping save PC gaming. Most people cant afford the expenisve $300 gfx or processor from the other companies. In effect, they provide cheaper products that really perform well for the little guy out there, which will also keep the other companies prices in check because of competition, which is good for all of us. This will keep more people playing and keep PC gaming alive.
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.
















