AMD Ahead of the Curve in GPU Shipments for Second Quarter of 2009

4

Comments

+ Add a Comment
avatar

mitcoes

Intel 50% NVIDIA 30% and ATI 20%

Why Intel with the worse product is the best seller: It is cheaper.

ATI has AMD, they can make integrated motherboards,

MB for laptops, notebooks and even barebones, cheap ones, but they don't. Why? I do not know, but they still lose money. AMD/ATI cheap netbook would beat ATOM, I'm sure it can, but it does not exist.

Nvidia has not 32bit processor, perhaps they will buy VIA, but the can make a computer with a CPU that is a GPU with Linux on the netbook market, or even on the servers market (ATI did a server only with GPUs).

 Am I a genius or an idiot or there are not many "market trend readers" and "market opportunity readers" on that companies as they must have.

 

What will happen the day Intel will have a good GPU, with a performance as good as a half of best ones from ATI and NVIDIA?

I do not want ATI and NVIDIA to disappear, but INTEL must be their target to increase sales, not other. 

avatar

tkddan87

of course amd is showing a little gain, its mid to low level cards are selling like hot cakes because theyre dirt cheap.  I agree with the other comments though the market competition is amazing for tech progress and pricing

avatar

Cooketh

The ATi / Nvidia competition is truly the best thing that could of ever happened to the GPU market. The rivals have, and continue to, give the best innovations in GPU technology at the lowest possible prices. It's awesome for the consumers.

avatar

vulchan

I can't agree more. Things are bound to get interesting with intel wanting a share of the market; a three-way bout would be neat. Also, Nvidia needs to buy VIA, then we will see some good (or bad) things in the near future.

Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook

Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.

Login with Facebook
Log in using Facebook to share comments and articles easily with your Facebook feed.