44% of Google News Readers Don't Click Through to Stories

5

Comments

+ Add a Comment
avatar

MeTo

Google should de list any body that makes you subscribe. Google needs to get back to it's core values.

avatar

ThunderBolt

I skim through the news, and read what seems to be interesting.  The most annoying news posts are from the Washington Post where in order for you to read an article, you have to subscribe.

That's why homepage

http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/9184/igoogle.jpg

avatar

Jox

“Though Google is driving some traffic to newspapers, it’s also taking a significant share away.”

This is the same (misguided) mentality that software/music/movie producers have. The 44% who visit Google news and don't click though to the originating website are NOT subscribers to news services in print OR digital form. This is not lost revenue - it's revenue that was never going to exist. These are the people who will get it for free or not at all. The 56% that do is pure Google-driven profit. The rest is the cost of doing business. To call it lost income is wishful thinking at best. Despite what the newspapers may think, there are plenty of people out there who are content to have no news at all rather than pay for it.

-Jox

avatar

Danielt876

People just dont have the time to read thw hole article.

avatar

majorsuave

And I eventually clicked to comment. But I admit I browse a lot of news on Google or within Google reader for them RSS feeds. 

Some sites have very short RSS feeds for which you have no choice but click the link. Others embed ads in it and then some put in their full content, ad free....

 

As for the news, Google news allow me mostly to select from what newspaper I want to read the news. 

 

Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook

Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.

Login with Facebook
Log in using Facebook to share comments and articles easily with your Facebook feed.