NEC Multisync 20WMGX2
NEC’s 90GX2 19-inch LCD has held a place on our Best of the Best list since June 2006, thanks to its fine performance and stunning glossy screen, so we were anxious to check out the latest model NEC is aiming at gamers, the 20WMGX2. It too features the patented OptiClear screen technology, which stands in stark contrast to the anti-glare/reflective surfaces on most LCD screens, including the three others here. The difference is truly dramatic, and made more so by the 20WMGX2’s brightness rating of 470 nits (units of luminance), while the others here are rated at 300 nits. Colors look more vivid, contrast seems heightened, and images pop with a dazzling intensity. (Note, however, that this mirrorlike screen can suffer glare issues in brightly lit environments, such as an office.)
The price of this pretty boy also stands in stark contrast to the others here, but the extra dough does buy you a number of amenities: a full complement of audio/video inputs, four USB 2.0 ports, a built-in TV tuner, picture-in-picture functionality, and a full-featured remote, plus HDCP support. NEC also throws in a built-in speaker, but this one is even more of an argument against the practice than ViewSonic’s version. Its sound was pathetically underpowered even with the volume turned all the way up (both on the speaker and within the PC’s control panel). There’s simply no way this speaker could provide a suitable accompaniment to your TV or movie viewing, to say nothing of its abilities with your music.
The screen tilts back and forth and swivels on a circular base but does not change height. The OSD offers all the usual choices, in addition to various content presets.
Sadly, despite its gamut of goodies, the 20WMGX2’s performance is seriously lacking. Several shades of dark gray were indistinguishable from black, even with the brightness at 100 percent (and mind you, this screen is already uncommonly bright!). Grayscale ramps, which should progress in a smooth, gradual manner, were riddled with bumps, kinks, and banding. And color-tracking discrepancies were visible in scales of 32 or more steps. These issues plagued the screen’s performance in our real-world tests. In high-res digital photos and illustrations, banding, contouring, and the presence of different hues disrupted what should have been subtle shade changes. In DVDs the effect was even more noticeable, with shade transitions appearing blocky and pixilated. And in HD, the panel’s poor grayscale abilities were all the more evident. Who even cares if it can play games without ghosting?
We would have loved for a bigger, more feature-packed version of the glorious, glossy 90GX2 to steal our hearts. Instead, this LCD has left us bitter and cynical.
CHUBBY CHECKERS
Bright as all get-out and loaded with extras.
CHUBBY CHEEKS
Expensive; majorly flawed
4
| SPECS | ||||
| NEC Multisync 20WMGX2 | ||||
| Viewable Screen | 20.1 inches | |||
| Native Resolution | 1680 x 1050 | |||
| Inputs | VGA, DVI, 4 S-video, Composite, Component, RCA, Stereo, TV | |||
Comments
![]()
mikuto
May 28, 2007 at 4:53am
Are you really calling this article a 'Review'? I mean... with a straight face? Half a page of general statements, of which only one paragraph is dedicated to some sort of performance evaluation, of which no real technical details are given, and that's it - the rest is a list of features?
I would say the only thing a reader could do after having wasted the time to read this article is disregard it in its entirety and go look elsewhere for a serious review - there are a few that can be called that.
![]()
QBZ5676
September 29, 2007 at 1:39pm
Max PC is one of the few lone dissenters of Hateorade on this monitor.
Even though it's been discontinued by NEC, I'm tempted to pick up one anyways because it seems that this is one of the very few leftover options for people who want a quality S-IPS based model vs. the crappy, cheap TNs everyone is going to, regardless of size.
This is a very frustrating marketplace, in general.
![]()
Kane
May 27, 2007 at 5:21pm
Is there a chance you guys received a bad unit? Or that during shipping it was damaged? I'm going to include an excerpt from a chat in another forum:
----
In the case of Maximum PC, they dwelled too much on how it performed on theoretical tests while letting the realistic and representative tests go right over their heads.Those reviews, to me, seem like blatantly false representations of this LCD's true ability. The only things about this LCD that warrant complaints IMO are the gradation/banding, and the price, if even that. TV quality could be better, speakers could be better, the backlight makes a buzzing noise when it's in standby mode, but these are all non-impeding and minor issues for me.
That Maximum PC cares more about how rigid a grayscale looks than the viewing angles of the LCD, something that affects every single thing displayed, shows their inability to properly assess a display. It doesn't even sound like they were in standard DV mode. The issues with gradation come up in hardly any material except a raw/wide grayscale test. I have had it manifest itself in the Blender 3D modeling program when I had a gray-shaded cube with wide stripes of gray across it, but that can be remedied by: a) changing the color of the cube; b) adjusting the monitor's settings; and c) going in another 3D view or just simply ignoring it. Even if it was a tad unsightly it certainly wasn't a showstopper.
----I'm not trying to piss anybody off here...I'd just like to know which monitor to buy and I've got very conflicting reviews on the net. What's your take on the above?
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.















