Intel Rolls Out Third-Generation SSD 320 Series in Capacities Up to 600GB
Intel set a new benchmark for SSD performance when it launched its X25-M range of solid-state drives in 2008. While the chip maker promptly updated the range a year later, even those second-generation X25-M SSDs now look fairly dated when compared to more recent alternatives, of which there are plenty in an increasingly competitive market. Intel on Monday ended a two-year-long wait for the third generation of its SSDs by announcing the new Intel SSD 320 series.
Available in 40, 80, 120, 160, 300 and 600GB capacities, the 320 series boasts a number of advantages over its second-generation predecessor, including better performance and enhanced security. The new SSDs are all based on its 25-nm NAND flash memory and feature 128-bit AES encryption. According to Intel, the 25-nm memory in the 320 series gives it an up to 30 percent price advantage over the current generation.
The SSD 320 is capable of sequential read and write speeds of up to 220 MB/s and 270 MB/s, respectively. But the third-generation SSDs only support the 3Gb/s SATA II interface and not the new and faster 6Gb/s SATA interface.
According to Intel, when purchased in 1000-unit lots, the 40, 80, 120, 160, 300, and 600GB SSDs in the 320 series are available for $89, $159, $209, $289, $529, and $1,069, respectively – not the retail prices.
Comments
Comments are closed on this article
![]()
Bullwinkle J Moose
March 30, 2011 at 5:50pm
Using the same controller as the G2 so its OS agnostic and needs no partition offset for XP users
So if and untill OCZ adds the offset to the Indilynx, this is still the best option for XP users
![]()
Silver925
March 29, 2011 at 5:04am
Yup. I always wonder when people worry too much about an SSD's lifespan. With the manufacture ratings in multi-millions of hours, most PC enthusiasts will upgrade well before the 'write limit' has an effect on the drive. And with no moving parts, I'd hazard to guess that most SSDs will outlive mechanical drives. Sure, the SSD might start to 'shrink' as blocks become corrupt, but you can still access it. When a mechanical drive stops spinning, the data is still perfectly sound, but completely out of reach unless you're willing to spend for professional recovery.
And, on a different point. SATA II!? ... Derr-huh? Seems like a strange choice for a 'next gen' SSD.
![]()
AETAaAS
March 28, 2011 at 9:38pm
Someone asked yesterday if I was over-taxing my SSD with numerous write operations. News like this makes me forget about that.
Its time for an upgrade. :D
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.


















