How We Test Wireless Routers
Posted 11/02/07 at 07:08:42 PM by Michael Brown
Note: Effective April 15: 2008, the server we use to run the J-Perf Measurement Tool is now connected to the router being tested via the homerun, as opposed to being plugged directly into the router's switch. The impact on TCP throughput as a result of this change has proven to be negligible. We also eliminated the Home Office location from our test sequence.
Note: Effective January 15, 2008, we added two new test locations within the home: An enclosed patio and a bedroom.
Maximum PC Lab North is located on 10 acres of what was once a dairy farm, so there shouldn’t be any problems with neighboring wireless networks causing channel bonding to shut down. The exterior frame of the house consists of 2x6 Douglas Fir framing sheathed in fiber-cement siding. The foundation is concrete and the roof is clad in composite shingles.
The interior walls are constructed from 2x4 Douglas Fir studs and are clad in drywall. The Media Room, however, is a room-within-a-room design: There are four walls of 2x4 studs and two layers of drywall inside four walls of 2x6 studs. There are two thicknesses of R19 insulation stuffed into the walls and the ceiling has two layers of drywall. Most of the interior walls inside the house are insulated for noise reduction. Two solid-core Masonite doors (one opens out into the foyer and the other opens in to the room) further deaden the room and prevent sound from leaking.
We pair the router with the same manufacturer’s Wi-Fi adapter. In order to measure peak performance, we set the router to operate in 802.11n-only mode with channel bonding enabled (assuming that feature is supported). We use the free utility Jperf (the Java front-end to Iperf) to measure TCP throughput to four locations in the house and three outside. We run one benchmark sequence with encryption turned off, and then a second run after enabling WPA2 security.
Here are the locations at which the notebook client are placed during benchmarking.
LOCATION 1: HOME OFFICE

The router is placed on top of the hutch (66 inches above the floor) and the notebook PC is on the desktop (five feet from the router). Note: We are no longer testing in the Home Office, effective April 15, 2008.
LOCATION 2: KITCHEN

The notebook is located on a granite countertop (45 inches above the floor and about 20 feet from the router), with one wall and a set of plywood cabinets separating the PC from the router.
LOCATION 3: ENCLOSED PATIO
The notebook is located on a glass table inside an enclosed patio (30 inches above the floor and 38 feet from the router). The patio is not part of the conditioned space of the home, so the signal must pass through one insulated exterior wall in addition to one insulated interior wall and a set of plywood cabinets.
LOCATION 4: BEDROOM

The notebook is located on a wooden nightstand (29 inches above the floor) in a bedroom that's about 60 feet from the router. The signal must pass through two insulated interior walls and a set of plywood cabinets.
LOCATION 5: MEDIA ROOM
The notebook is on a coffee table inside this double-walled, double-doored media room, about 35 feet from the router. There are five walls (three of which are insulated) separating the notebook from the router. (The doors are an exterior type in order to reduce sound leakage.)
LOCATION 6: OUTDOORS A

The notebook is outside the house, 90 feet from and at on oblique angle to the router. There are two interior and one exterior walls (all of which are insulated) separating the notebook from the router.
LOCATION 7: OUTDOORS B

The notebook is located outside the house 85 feet and at a right angle to the router. There is a set of plywood cabinets, four interior walls, and one exterior wall (all of which are insulated) separating the notebook from the router.
NEAREST NEIGHBOR

The closest house is quite a distance away, so there shouldn't be any router conflicts that would cause problems with channel bonding. (That's part of a grid-tied solar system in the upper right corner.)
cets
Submitted by alper on Sun, 08/30/2009 - 2:08am
En seviyeli chat odaları ,
En çok kızların takıldığı sohbet odası kızlarla sohbet ,
Herseyin Bedava olduğu Chat sitesi bedava ,
Cap canlı Heyecanlı Sohbet sitesi sohbet ve canlı sohbet ,
En Sexi Sohbet kanalları sex sohbet ve
Cinsel Sohbetin Doruklara ulaştığı Sohbet Mekanı cinsel sohbet
Cinsellik sohbetde 1 numaralı serveri cinsel sohbet ,
izmir şehrinin en beğenilen sohbet sitesi izmir sohbet ,
Sohbet mi arıyorsun sohbet aramak ve bulmak çok kolay sohbetara ,
netlog sohbetlerin en iyisi burda sohbet odaları , netlog ve netlok TR de en çok ziyaret edilen arkadaşlık sitesi netlog
, Sizler için geliştirilmiş olan kameralı sohbet sitemizde var kameralı sohbet Bekliyoruz..
cets
Submitted by alper on Sun, 08/30/2009 - 2:08am
En seviyeli chat odaları ,
En çok kızların takıldığı sohbet odası kızlarla sohbet ,
Herseyin Bedava olduğu Chat sitesi bedava ,
Cap canlı Heyecanlı Sohbet sitesi sohbet ve canlı sohbet ,
En Sexi Sohbet kanalları sex sohbet ve
Cinsel Sohbetin Doruklara ulaştığı Sohbet Mekanı cinsel sohbet
Cinsellik sohbetde 1 numaralı serveri cinsel sohbet ,
izmir şehrinin en beğenilen sohbet sitesi izmir sohbet ,
Sohbet mi arıyorsun sohbet aramak ve bulmak çok kolay sohbetara ,
netlog sohbetlerin en iyisi burda sohbet odaları , netlog ve netlok TR de en çok ziyaret edilen arkadaşlık sitesi netlog
, Sizler için geliştirilmiş olan kameralı sohbet sitemizde var kameralı sohbet Bekliyoruz..
Good idea, but no follow through.
Submitted by ICEinLAVA on Tue, 02/26/2008 - 5:27am
So now that you created the test environments, where's the results? or is about 4 months not enough time to take accurate benchmarks?
Purpose of the Test Environments
Submitted by MrMick on Wed, 03/12/2008 - 8:20am
The purpose of this article is to explain the methodology we use for testing wireless routers. Each time we publish a review, such as the Linksys WRT600N , we'll link to this story so the reader can gain an understanding of how we got our numbers.
Here's a link to the WRT600N review
Internet Access
Submitted by MrMick on Wed, 01/02/2008 - 8:20am
Broadband Internet access was my biggest concern when I moved into my new house, because Comcast (the "in-town" cable provider) didn't offer service outside the city limits, and AT&T didn't provide DSL.
I was about to subscribe to a Wi-Max service (ClearWire had just started operating in the area), but I thought I'd check with AT&T one more time. As it turned out, the company had decided--in response to ClearWire, no doubt--to add a few more central offices outside the city limits. One of these was less than 100 feet from my driveway (although my house is set back about 300 feet from the street).
In any event, I now have 6Mb/sec DSL service. It's not nearly as fast as Cable, but I'm satisfied.
Michael Brown
Executive Editor
A little heads up
Submitted by harbingercmt on Tue, 02/24/2009 - 5:43pm
Just read your router article in the January edition of MPC. What caught my attention was your new house being built on what was once a dairy farm. I grew up in a rural area till much of it was paved over with new houses, strip malls, etc. Even though the crush of development and the problems it brought (transportation, taxes, crime, etc.) were a real bummer; I had hoped we would finally get an alternative to dial up internet. There is a satellite solution, but from what I've seen - it is only marginally faster than dial up.
So here's my question: How does an employee for MPC put up with painfully slow internet? Is there a sweet DSL, cable, or (dare I say) fiber optic option that you have somehow been able to acquire?
Thanks much in advance
Feature
Review
Feature
Feature
Feature





