Build It: Three Water-Cooling Techniques Detailed and Constructed

More like this
49

Comments

Comments are closed on this article

avatar

aferrara50

April 25, 2011 at 5:02pm

you fail to detail the difference between radiators and how different radiators are built for fans with varying static pressure. A black ice gtx series rad with apx 1800+ rpm fans will hand every other radiator its butt by comparison and SR-1 series radiators dominate in the sub 800 rpm range. Custom loops are the only way to go since you can tailor it to your specific needs. Swiftech makes decent bang for your buck equipment, but it is far from high end. The water/air delta determines the quality of the loop, not the temp of the cpu since it could be a bad mount. The better system will have a lower temp at the exit of the last rad in the loop (or a generally lower water temp overall). I went from a custom $400 loop for my rig to a $2300 loop and the difference is absurd. 2C water/air delta and the computer is completely silent. The difference that a custom loop brings to the table isn't with budget builds, but rather high end, high tdp builds. Really anything can cool just the cpu (as proved by the H50), but once you start throwing in multiple gpus that will really test the quality of the loop. Cmon guys! this is the 2nd wc build posted on here without using pumptops for the pumps! even last year's dream machine's DDC didn't have a pumptop which increases performance by up to 40%.

avatar

syddraf

April 15, 2011 at 2:32pm

so I am currently considering watter cooling for a crossfire/sli build due to the fact that air flow between the two cards won't be that great.  my question is what would be the best way to set it up? 

should I run more than one radiator or leave it with one?

avatar

DarthBeavis

March 19, 2011 at 9:40am

I build more water-cooled systems each year than most people here I bet. If you want an immediate 15c drop in temps use Jager as your coolant.

avatar

neural0

July 28, 2011 at 1:19pm

I really wish I could say that I didn't google "jager cooling" right after I read the post...

avatar

DarthBeavis

March 19, 2011 at 9:40am

I build more water-cooled systems each year than most people here I bet. If you want an immediate 15c drop in temps use Jager as your coolant.

avatar

skinnee

March 17, 2011 at 9:13pm

Wow... this turned in to quite the comments thread. :)

Lots of numbers and suggestions being thrown around and there are several factors that could have lead to this 8C difference in testing of 3/8" tube vs. 1/2" tube. Martin used the estimator, which doesn't have absolute accuracy either, but it does point out the difference in tube size (with all other factors remaining constant) is minor and probably not going to mean squat at the end of the day.

Instead of pulling out the soap box... TheMurph, feel free to contact me in the future if you're looking for some liquid cooling assistance, Skinnee Labs would be glad to help ensure consistent and meaningful testing for MPC readers.

-- Cameron (skinnee) Shears

 

avatar

Martinm210

March 17, 2011 at 5:48pm

Regarding your comment about tubing size is everything:

Using the following components:

Swiftech Apogee XT, MCR-320, 6' of tubing, one reservoir and a D5/mcp655/pmp450 pumps, you would see roughly the following flow rates:

1/2" ID tubing = 1.20 GPM

3/8" ID tubing = 1.19 GPM (-.08C)

A net flow rate loss of 0.01 GPM or 0.8% and a temperature loss of .08C.

Considering the DTS sensor resolution is 1 full degree, your average user could not see a measurable difference between the two tubing sizes.

I'm not sure what occurred to create your 8C difference when switching tubing, but I assure you it is not due to the restriction difference in tubing size when using strong pumps such as the Laing series pumps.  It's just not physically possible and I believe you may have experienced some other variable causing the change for you.

I personally use 7/16" x 5/8" OD tubing, but for cosmetic reasons, 3/8" ID is perfectly fine for users and will not make any substatial or even practically measurable difference.

Anyhow, just passing along some scientific data for your consideration.

Cheers!
Martin 

 

 

avatar

TheMurph

March 24, 2011 at 1:16pm

I'll paste our final numbers and configuration, just so we're all on the same page.

Test equipment: Swiftech H20-X20, which consists of an, "Apogee XTL CPU water-block, MCR220-Drive radiator with integrated MCP35X pump and reservoir, fans, Radbox and accessories, 6 ft 1/2" tubing." Run on an Intel Core i7-930 CPU.

Coolant: Distilled water + Swiftech HydrX additive.

All temperatures recorded after an hour has elapsed .  Number shown is the average of the recorded temperature (celcius) for all four cores. The two tubing tests were run immediately after each other to negate the effects of ambient temperature.

 

Swiftech setup with 1/2-inch ID tubing:

CPU Average Temp Idle (no overclock; 1603 GHz frequency recorded): 30.5

CPU Average Temp (100% Burn, all 4 cores, 2940 GHz frequency recorded): 47.5

CPU Maximum Temp recorded (100% Burn): 52.75

 

CPU Average Temp Idle (overclock enabled; 2280 GHz frequency at idle): 36.5

CPU Average Temp (100% Burn; 3990 frequency): 68

CPU Maximum Temp recorded (100% burn): 69.75

 

Swiftech setup with 3/8-inch ID tubing:

 

CPU Average Temp Idle (no overclock; 1603 GHz frequency recorded): 33.75

CPU Average Temp (100% Burn, all 4 cores, 2940 GHz frequency recorded): 55

CPU Maximum Temp recorded (100% Burn): 56

 

CPU Average Temp Idle (overclock enabled; 2280 GHz frequency at idle): 38

CPU Average Temp (100% Burn; 3990 frequency): 81

CPU Maximum Temp recorded (100% burn): 83.5

 

avatar

JBC548

March 17, 2011 at 3:45pm

Why don't you install the fan and radiator inside a small refrig? That would double its BTU capacity, and you'd never have an overload situation on the CPU.  You could use anti-freeze to prevent any possibility of freeze-up. 

avatar

Shazza

March 17, 2011 at 2:41pm

You state you saw a 13+ degree difference between 3/8" and 1/2" tubing size.  You have also brushed off concerns expressed over this difference by explaining this was in a loaded/overclocked situation. 

Please, please, please go back and do some retesting.  By making this statement about such a large temp difference between the tubing sizes, you have lost all credibility with people who build water cooled setups.  And, you are propagating a myth that gives many people misinformation.  

Most of us who are into water cooling as a hobby have built multiple systems, trying all types of configurations. And, it's common practice to test our systems at full load.  Many people get started in this hobby because we want to overclock - so it's not like thousands of experienced people would have missed this tubing size issue.

Please don't ignore my request.  I was delighted to see more coverage of water cooling in Maximum PC, and would like to see even more in the future.  BUT, either something else was going on that you didn't notice, or you have run into a one in a million configuration where tubing size is so critical.  While I seriously doubt the second, I'm always open to learning something new.  

Respectfully submitted.

 

avatar

Waco

March 17, 2011 at 10:49am

I honestly don't know how you managed to create a setup that barely outperforms the H70...and gets beaten by the Swiftech kit!

$500+ and you BARELY beat a $100 cooler.  How could you ever possibly think that you did this properly?

The conclusions, data, and hell, everything in this article are so far from the truth that I felt compelled to make a new account to post.

Tube size SHOULD NOT affect your temperatures by more than a couple percent - even going from 1/4" tubing to 5/8" tubing.

I just don't know what to say.  

 

TO EVERYONE:  If you're looking into doing watercooling - DO NOT follow any suggestions in this article unless you simply want to waste your money.  You can do far better for less money.

avatar

fallout330

March 16, 2011 at 4:32pm

You mentioned that you added thermal paste on the CPU to install the Hydro H70. Does this mean there was no thermal pad on the H70 prior to install?  When I installed my H50, there was already a thermal pad on the block, so I did not add an additional thermal paste. 

 

Thanks

avatar

Brechan

March 15, 2011 at 8:48pm

Dispite what others have said about the article; it gave me an informative view on different ways to 'water cool' a typical computer, though I would have chosen a different setup rather than Swiftech-based on cost alone.

There are more water cooling manufacturers coming out with their own versions of the "all-in-one"; so it is good see that there are choices for those of us that are just getting our feet wet-so to speak- moreover, some choices are less expensive, some more...but at least we have choices now.

http://www.frozencpu.com/cat/l3/g30/c321/s1367/list/p1/Liquid_Cooling-Water_Cooling_Kits_-_Brands-Ek_Water_Cooling_Kits-Page1.html

 

http://www.frozencpu.com/cat/l3/g30/c321/s1310/list/p1/Liquid_Cooling-Water_Cooling_Kits_-_Brands-XSPC_Water_Cooling_Kits-Page1.html

 

I have tried the "closed-loop systems"; namely, the CoolIt ECO A.L.C. and the CoolIt Domino A.L.C., and found that they just didn't cool my system to the temperatures that I thought they would (an AMD Phenom 9950 idling @ 39c). This is why I have chosen to go the route of true water cooling.

If the MPC gods would smile apon you, it would a good read if you could compare 3 different water cooling kits from Swiftech, XSPC, and EK Waterblocks.

avatar

Elfie

March 15, 2011 at 6:15pm

I've been using 3/8" tubing for a year but now this has inspired me to replace all my bitspower compressions with the 1/2" version to get such a massive drop in temps. Although the fittings will cost the equivalent of $110 here in the UK it's going to be well worth it for such an improvement. Thank you for this helpful article.

avatar

TRoiKA

March 16, 2011 at 1:37pm

I wouldnt make that switch so fast.  I would check out other sources of information and other tests before spending that kind of money to possibly be dissapointed.  I can tell you that a 14 degree drop in temp for a 1/8th inch difference in tubing is NOT normal.  I would just advise you to do more research before making that type of purchase!

avatar

D00dlavy

March 15, 2011 at 10:34am

iBuyPower puts water cooling on their systems for free.  My pump was so loud, though, plus the hoses were long and they were sort of kinking - I just took it off and installed a really large, quiet fan and heatsink.

I forgot how much force it takes to install heatsinks on AMD processors.

avatar

klue22

March 14, 2011 at 10:03pm

Lordy 70 degrees at full burn? I can't even hardly break 55 on my 970 at 4.2 non-turbo. Granted its a 32nm arch but at the same time I'm also running 2x 285s in series in the same loop. I have an additional rad as well but your temps still seem hot because I can't even begin to approach them even with the CPU and GPUs folding 100%.

avatar

MattyMattMatt

March 14, 2011 at 7:11pm

Where do you find an Antec TPG 850 for 125? They're sold out where I shop and 150 or more :(

avatar

silent975x

March 14, 2011 at 4:19pm

 

There is so much misinformation in this article and in these comments, it's disgusting.

Anyone who wants legitimate information about liquid cooling should go to www.xtremesystems.org/forums

MaxPC has always been so fails at enthusiast cooling systems - give up, or get serious.

 

avatar

Stvwndr219

March 15, 2011 at 6:48am

Here's an interesting thread about the testing methodology:

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=267696

And both Cathar and Martinm, both respected voices in the W/C community point to there being a negligible difference betweeen 3/8" and 1/2" tubing. Cathar's test is below:

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=147767

This was also done with a full load on the computer.  Regardless, a 10C difference due to only tubing is absolutely absurd.  Can you verify that both mounts were exactly the same, both times the seating was correct, and the correct amount of TIM was used?  All of these factors would contribute to that 10C difference but tubing certainly would not.

avatar

TheMurph

March 14, 2011 at 6:28pm

So what's the misinformation?

avatar

silent975x

March 14, 2011 at 7:29pm

First off, yes the D5 (MCP655) has more flow rate than something like a DDC (MCP35X).  However, this is COMPLETELY offset by that mass amount of quick disconnects.  The 655 has far less available head pressure compared to the 35X - pressure you will surely need when trying to push water through 6 quickdisconnects.  Speaking of which, that many QDS will be about equivalent to adding the restriction of another CPU block into your loop.

Second, 3/8" tubing compared to 1/2" tubing has been shown over and over again to have negligible difference.  In fact, splitting the difference with 7/16" ID tubing can often work out better because you have that negligible diameter increase, whilst also having the flexibility of 3/8" for tighter tube routing.  You must have the only test results which show 1/2" ID to be far superior - might make you question your testing methodology?

Third, $558 for a CPU only loop?  My god man.  About twice what you needed to spend.  Of course it wasn't helped by the sinful amount of QD bling you stuffed onto every component...but whatever.

P.S. Tygon is expensive, and really isn't better than Primochill Pro LRT which is far easier to work with, and looks nicer ;)

Good choice on the fans though?  I saw someone below dissing on them, more fails.

avatar

TheMurph

March 14, 2011 at 11:49pm

"You must have the only test results which show 1/2" ID to be far superior - might make you question your testing methodology?"

No.  As mentioned below, there is a negligible difference for tube sizes at lower CPU temperatures -- e.g. running our processor idle on 3/8 or 1/2 didn't show much of a difference at all.  The difference became far more apparent, however, the more one generates a crap-ton of heat for the rig--in this case, kicking the processor up to 4.0 GHz and letting it rip.

$558 is expensive, yes.  I happen to think that the Quick Disconnects are worth every penny.  And I'd like to see the numbers you're using when you bring up flow restriction in the quickdisconnects.  I quote:

"In the end, I can certainly say I was wrong on Quick Disconnects. They do not bring the restriction I thought they did to our loops, not sure what I was thinking or if I was just over concerned about it."

--http://skinneelabs.com/quick-disconnect-roundup/

 

avatar

silent975x

March 15, 2011 at 1:29pm

"In the end, I can certainly say I was wrong on Quick Disconnects. They do not bring the restriction I thought they did to our loops, not sure what I was thinking or if I was just over concerned about it."

Didn't bring the restriction he thought, does not mean they did not bring restriction.  Careful with your quotes.

Look at skinnees graph comparing a vanilla D5 loop to a D5 loop with only 2 QDS.  The 2 QDS (V3LN) dropped flow by .19GPM from the vanilla 1.61GPM.  Now, assume a linear path, and add 2 more pairs of QDS into that loop, dropping it by an additional .38GPM.  Now you have 1.04GPM for a total drop of .57GPM - about a 35% reduction in flow from the base loop.  

Can i ask you a question?  How often do you expect to be changing/cleaning your loop that you need a QD on every component?

Not going into the tubing debate, because I see someone else has spoken on that ^

avatar

FuzzDad

March 14, 2011 at 3:46pm

What was the ambient temp in the room? I ask because the CPU temps seem a tad high at idle and I think you *should* have gotten better temps at full power w/the more traditional water cooled systems. Over 70C just seems too high for those setups. Maybe it's all the quick disconnects...they do reduce flow to a point.

I also agree w/you on Koolance products...their new CPU and GPU waterblocks are excellent (as are their fittings...the 3 series seems to grade higher on spillage and flow as opposed to the newer 4 series but both are solid disconnects)...but I have to say I've never seen that many quick disconnects on a system. Unique it is!

avatar

TheMurph

March 14, 2011 at 6:31pm

70C seems high even with a 1.2 GHz overclock?

avatar

Lt.Nefarious

March 18, 2011 at 2:10pm

I'm running a Core i7 920 at 4.0 GHz (1.4 GHz overclock) with a full EK motherboard water block and a EK HF supreme water block running distilled water will a silver kill coil my temps are 38 C idle and 49 C at load. Something is definitely wrong with the setup!

avatar

FuzzDad

March 14, 2011 at 6:44pm

Maybe not...what were your OC specs (vcore, etc)?  I have a i7 920 w/dual 460's in a single loop w/360 and a 120rad and at 3.8gHZ I'm in the low 60's on a EK Supreme HF w/EK 12V pump (on distilled). Tubing is 3/8".

avatar

TheMurph

March 14, 2011 at 6:56pm

Hm.  Surprised MPC didn't print the sidebar on overclocking that went with this article in the print mag.  Here's a rough draft of it:

So you want to jack your processor up to insane speeds, don’t you?  Alright.  Here’s how I overclocked my Core i7-930 test system in a nutshell: Cranking up the speeds on a Core i7 chip requires one to head into the BIOS and up the CPU’s base clock from its default of 133 to whatever number you think your system can handle.  The base clock times the CPU’s multiplier—21, in this case—equals the processor’s final, overall speed.  I had to jump mine to 190 to hit the four-gigahertz bar.

 

But! The base clock directly affects the speeds at which both the system’s memory and Quick Path Interconnect will run.  Pushing either too high (above my RAM’s rated value of 1600 MHz or the QPI’s 4.8 GT/s default) leads to system instability slash death, so I had to manually set the former to 1,523 MHz and the latter to 6.85 GT/s within the BIOS.

 

Not done yet, though!  The hungry system’s components demanded more energy for stability, so I had to kick up the CPU’s voltage to 1.4, the QPI’s to 1.4, and the RAM’s to 1.64—all of .01 below its rated voltage limits.  Now that’s hardcore—hardcore, stable, and fast!

avatar

FuzzDad

March 14, 2011 at 8:57pm

Ok...i have ioh 1.2, ich 1.2, dimm at 1.65, cpu pll 1.88, qpi/uncore 1.35, vcore 1.4Bclk w/191 to hit 4MHz. Using Prime95 I hit a max of 64C on two of the four cores (after 45min) and as I type this (10min later), my idle temp is 33/34C.  What's your TIM?...that may be some of it...I picked up Indigo Extreme and it dropped my hi-end temps 2-3C from Arctic 5. Regardless...being able to run these processors at 4MHz w/o really worrying about burning the house down is a big plus. 

One thing's for sure...if you go into water cooling the money leaps out of your wallet because as soon as you try it you want to buy more and more equipment, upgrade to this, install that, change your reservoir/pump/whatchamacallit/etc...it's like custom car work...and $$$

avatar

TheMurph

March 15, 2011 at 12:00am

I presume you've also kicked off turbo boost and speedstep?

fwiw, my overclock temps hover around those MPC generated in its initial article for an i7-920:

http://www.maximumpc.com/article/features/ultimate_core_i7_overclocking_guide_we_push_nehalem_its_limits?page=0,2

Of course, the 80 degrees or so was done with an air cooler.  I would expect a water-cooled rig to be up there, but not quite that high.

Also, fwiw, all testing for this article was done in the exact same location with the exact same procedures (in terms of keeping the room temperature as similar as possible).  It was a bit warm in here, I'll give it that -- but that warmth would have affected each and every tests, making it a moot point.

avatar

FuzzDad

March 15, 2011 at 11:20am

Yup (for the test)...I like leaving them on however because i leave my PC on for long periods of time and it's nice to let it idle at 2MHz rather than keeping things hot all the time.  I use the OC info listed here for mine: http://www.overclock.net/intel-cpus/538439-guide-overclocking-core-i7-920-930-a.html

What's interesting is watercooling developed into a very high-end niche but the inclusion of the H50 brought thousands of neophytes into that world...and after using the H50 people w/enough disposable income are trying more hardcore approaches. You even see manufacturers mixing it up w/OC'rs while they build their new products in several of the more lively forums based on water cooling and overclocking. I even saw a small firm posting images of the water block they were milling. It's pretty "cool".  lol.

avatar

TRoiKA

March 14, 2011 at 2:15pm

In the article "how to build a kick ass liquid cooling system - 6 simple steps" you guys mention that "the demonstratable difference in between the two sizes of tubing (3/8 and 1/2) was slim" but now you say it drops the temps TEN degrees?  You even suggested choosing 3/8 due to its slimmer tendency to bend!  Also, in that article, you reference the fact that all "modern" cooling systems use some kind of anti conductive and anti corrosive coolant, whereas here you denounce these fluids like they are the biggest waste of money.  Im planning on water cooling soon but all these confliciting views are confusing me! Can someone provide clarification?

avatar

TheMurph

March 14, 2011 at 6:39pm

I can't speak to the other article; I can only speak to this one.  I would indeed add some kind of anti-microbial agent to distilled water if I was to use it in my rig.  My point in this article was that one does not need to spend $50 on the super-fancy fluids when distilled + an additive will work just as well.

As for the tubing, you won't see as much of a difference in temperatures on an idle CPU.  When or if you start hitting full burn, however, half-inch tubing will allow you to keep your temperatures lower.

avatar

Danthrax66

March 14, 2011 at 2:54pm

They did something wrong if you want real liquid cooling help you should look at other sources evga forums is one of the better places. But yeah the general consensus is that 3/8 and 1/2 inch doesn't make that much of a difference but if you can go 1/2 then by all means go for it.

 

Here is a very informative list of stickies the first link doesn't work though http://www.evga.com/forums/tm.aspx?m=574023

avatar

TheMurph

March 14, 2011 at 6:36pm

In our tests, using a 3/8-inch tube instead of a 1/2-inch tube resulted in a 13.75-degree difference on our overclocked rig.  That's 13.75 degrees hotter, mind you.

We didn't see nearly as much of a difference on a stock clock or overclocked rig running idle--as expected.

avatar

Danthrax66

March 14, 2011 at 12:30pm

This is the worst custom liquid loop I have seen. Koolace??? Are you serious Koolance makes shit.

 

http://www.sidewindercomputers.com/ekwaekhfac.html <-- better water block

http://www.frozencpu.com/products/11110/ex-tub-703/Bitspower_Matte_Black_Ultimate_G_14_Thread_12_ID_x_34_OD_Rotary_Compression_Fitting_BP-MBRCPF-CC5.html?tl=g30c409s1033  <-- better compression fittings

Why would you use those fans??? Those aren't that good for lquid cooling you need fans with high static pressure.

 

Oh and where did you get those outrageous prices? http://www.sidewindercomputers.com/swmc12vdcpuw.html <--$67 for the pump

 

Also that radiator isn't adding much you would be better off with one of these http://www.frozencpu.com/products/5069/ex-rad-93/Black_Ice_GT_Stealth_360_X-Flow_Radiator_-_Black.html?tl=g30c95s161 cheaper and roughly equal performace for your needs.

 

Also $70 for a tank? http://www.frozencpu.com/products/9577/ex-res-158/Bitspower_Water_Tank_Z-Multi_400_Inline_Reservoir_BP-WTZM400P-BK.html?tl=g30c97s165 <-- cheaper

 

 

And don't tell people to just run straight distilled water or else they will end up with a tank full of aquatic life and a few ruined blocks and radiators. You sould probably be using a silver kill coil http://www.petrastechshop.com/sikibyia.html and some PT Nuke for anticorrosion http://search.store.yahoo.net/yhst-65556269779593/cgi-bin/nsearch <-- you only need one of those either copper based or PHN based depending on the metals in your loop. And probably the most important thing when building a loop: DON'T MIX METALS

avatar

TheMurph

March 14, 2011 at 6:54pm

I'm not going to address all of your points, as I don't have time to pull out all of the benchmark numbers.  Suffice, you're armchairing your water-cooling analysis based on things you've read.  I'm reporting based on things I've tested.

In this case, I indeed used the exact EK Waterblocks product you refer to (the EK Supreme HF Universal CPU Liquid Cooling Block - Rev 2) during my testing.  I found that the Koolance waterblocked used in the feature (a new design, at the time) gave us an average temperature of 61 degrees on the full-burn, overclocked test system.  The EK block hit 65 degrees.

Also, your suggestion for compression fittings is right out.  Please check out the little addendum we did on the Koolance quick disconnects -- I would never use a compression fitting over these. No way, no how.

I'm not a fan expert by any means, but I've done my research and plenty of tests seemed to indicate that the Gentle Typhoons were the way to go based a ratio of noise to cooling potential.  I did test different fans myself, and felt that these were the best selection (albeit leading to a little bit warmer of a system) based on the lower noise they generated.

Anyway, I appreciate your comment.  Indeed, one can make water-cooling loops in about 100 different ways, as a commenter notes.

avatar

Danthrax66

March 16, 2011 at 8:11pm

What plate did you use with the EK block? Also did you try the Heatkiller v3 ? And the biggest problem I have is the inflated prices you used. Also The gentle typhoons really aren't that great due to the low static pressure and it is always easier to get higher power fans and to then use a speed control than to have low powered fans and want to push your system higher.  I would really like to see an all out water loop or a custom water loop. You should also factor in the ease with which you can add motherboard blocks and gpu blocks.

 

Also I;m still hugn up on the results you recieved using the EK HF the Koolance and the Swiftech... I know for a fact that the EK HF beats the Swiftech in temps, yet you are saying that the swiftech beats the Koolance and that the Koolance beats the EK???? Something was seriously wrong with your tests. Maybe you got a bent EK block? Or a misformed one? You guys should try lapping it and see what happens.

avatar

AmTGMan

March 14, 2011 at 3:13pm

Actually, Koolance has been making good quality parts for a few years now, rather than the shit they used to push. You just need to know which components to look for. (i.e.: avoid the legacy parts, and go for the newer parts, and ask around on various forums.) The CPU-370 looks be a solid block, if not the absolute best. And switching to a EK Supreme HF (Also an excellent block) would result in a negligible difference.

 

Also, the radiator you linked really isn't that good. It's cheap, and thin, so it's easy to stuff into a case. However, it has a fins-per-inch count of 30. Most pc radiators have around 8-10 fpi. The reason for that is the greater the fin density, the harder it is for the fans to force air through the radiator. To get enough airflow to take advantage of the high fin density, you need high-rpm fans, and they are loud, removing one of the main advantages of water cooling. (If you need a high fpi radiator, a Black Ice GTX Xtreme would be a better buy, anyway.) Hardware Labs do make good radiators, the one you linked isn't really one of them.

 

The Gentle Typhoons they used are actually some of the best fans you can buy for radiators, being low noise, yet having plenty of static pressure for a radiator.

 

The XSPC rad they used is an excellent radiator, as well. It's well suited for low-rpm fans, but isn't completely useless with higher rpm fans. They made a good choice here.

 

They did go overboard with the reservoir, I'll agree with you there. A smaller one would be a better buy.

 

While I personally diasgree with how many quick disconnects they used, they should be fine. The ones you linked to are definitely a good choice, though.

 

And you are correct, straight distilled = BAD IDEA. They should have mentioned the use of a biocide.

 

Sources:

www.xtremesystems.org

www.overclock.net

www.skinneelabs.com

avatar

Danthrax66

March 16, 2011 at 8:16pm

Honestly the radiator wouldn't matter that much you and it would cost less. Also noise doesn't bother me so I would have put some deltas on that bitch and called it a day :D

avatar

TheMurph

March 14, 2011 at 6:59pm

"And you are correct, straight distilled = BAD IDEA. They should have mentioned the use of a biocide."

That is correct.  I was making the point that distilled water -- as a base -- funcitoned no worse than the $50 stuff one can otherwise buy.  Obviously, one would want to pour an additive in there, as we do in the custom system itself.  I could have definitely made this more clear, however.

avatar

Danthrax66

March 16, 2011 at 8:12pm

Straight distilled water should always function better than the fancy fluids.  The fancy fluids sacrifice cooling power for the avoidance of corrosion and aquatic life.

avatar

bpstone

March 14, 2011 at 1:49pm

That is the beautiful thing about custom water cooling. There are a hundred different combinations you can use to achieve great results.

avatar

Danthrax66

March 14, 2011 at 2:28pm

Yeah and I'm pointing out the fact that they overpaid for a terrible combination lol. I mean I think they would try to at least put some effort forward if they wanted to do a true comparison. But this just looks like an advertisement for Corsair and Swiftech. Although that swiftech set is very good.

avatar

TheMurph

March 14, 2011 at 7:04pm

Dude, what are you talking about?

The point of this build-it, as noted in the text, is that we're comparing a custom-build system to all-in-one setups.  This is not a value judgment that Corsair or Swiftech represent the best-in-class kits for an all-in-one setups.  They are merely test examples that we're using in the "built it yourself or buy it aftermarket" sense of the story.

In a perfect world, I'd love to put 5 different AIO setups through their paces.  That was not the purpose of this feature.  There might very well be better kits than either company's; I haven't tested that, so I can't say that as a definitive statement myself.

And I put a ton of effort into this piece, I'd like to note -- for length, we didn't get into all the different permutations of loops and products I tested.  Perhaps I can explore this in a future column, provided the MPC Gods are feeling generous.   ; )

avatar

Danthrax66

March 16, 2011 at 8:14pm

But the thing is you paid $500 for a worse performing custom kit? I don't understand how you could have accomplished that...

avatar

immersive

March 14, 2011 at 12:29pm

For the life of me I can not figure out what the blue wires are. Are they USB 3.0 from back of mobo to the front headers?

avatar

Jarol

March 14, 2011 at 2:07pm

USB 3.0. They come with the case. They go from the very front panel (which is at the top front) to the back. The HAF is suppose to have a ton of room in the back panel for those things to hide, but they did a quick job on it and it shows.

 

Anyway just popping in to say that I bought that same case for exactly this purpose. The case is built exclusively for watercooling in mind. I too would like to dive in on it, but it is not going to come cheap thats for sure. This article should make sure to name it specifically as the HAF 942 case. There are 3 or 4 models out there and the 942 is the latest one.

Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook

Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.

Login with Facebook
Log in using Facebook to share comments and articles easily with your Facebook feed.
Don't have an account? Join Now.