IBM Breaks Performance Records with 256-Core Unix Server
For the inevitable comedian who thinks he's being witty by posting a comment asking, "Yes, but can it run Crysis," the answer is, "Yes, it can, so go out and buy a dozen of them." That's wrong, of course, but IBM's latest Power7-based system does have what it takes to top the 10 million transactions per minute mark using the industry standard TPC performance benchmark, IBM says.
With a 10,366,245 tpmC score, IBM lays claim to the highest TPC-C benchmark result using a Power Systems configuration with its DB2 database software. According to IBM, that's more than twice as fast as HP's best result, and 35 percent better than what Oracle was able to achieve.
That's impressive, even if it isn't designed to run Crysis, or any other game for that matter. So who can use these systems?
"Smarter healthcare providers, cities, retailers, smarter energy grids, and financial systems, all require support for ever greater data volumes and transaction throughput," said Arvind Krishna, General Manager, IBM Information Management. "The results of this benchmark demonstrate how IBM innovations combine to deliver unprecedented performance and cost efficiency for data intensive applications. Not only can you scale to massive data volumes and transaction throughput, but you can do so economically in an energy efficient way."
The record breaking benchmark score was achieved using DB2 9.7 with a cluster of three IBM Power 780 servers, each one sporting 8 processors, 64 cores, and 256 threads.

Comments
Comments are closed on this article
![]()
chaosdsm
August 18, 2010 at 5:51pm
Three IBM Power 780 Servers
EACH ONE - sporting 8 processors, 64 cores, & 256 threads... that would be 24 processors, 192 cores, & 768 threads total... that's 8 cores per processor BTW ;)
![]()
filip007
August 18, 2010 at 1:36pm
OK but number are wrong, 3x8=24 CPU with 64 cores, that's 2.66666... cores per CPU ?
and what smarty pants delete my avatar ?
![]()
white_sereph
August 18, 2010 at 10:54pm
to filip007 who said:
"OK but number are wrong, 3x8=24 CPU with 64 cores, that's 2.66666... cores per CPU ?"
----------
The numbers are not wrong, in fact. You've made an error reading.
8 processors per machine x 3 machines clustered = 24 processors total in the cluster
64 cores per machine x 3 machines clustered = 192 cores total in the cluster
256 threads per machine x 3 machines clustered = 768 threads total in the cluster
chaosdsm gave the math correctly.
Each processor had 8 cores. Each server had 8 processors, so 8x8=64 cores.
Each core could run 4 parallel threads. Each server had 64 cores, so 64x4=256 threads.
All of the above - multiplied by 3 - as there were three machines in the cluster.
![]()
gothliciouz
August 18, 2010 at 5:17pm
i wonder how much does this system cost, i could use one to do my blu-ray encodings and save lots of times.
yess! i will do that, i will use windows 7 feature warp to run crysis without a gpu at maximun settings>hmm, can that be done?.
oh!..btw whh deleted my avatar?...i want it back by tomorrow or else!...
![]()
Tedster
August 18, 2010 at 6:21am
Now, when can I start up a Folding@home SMP client with the -smp 256 flag
Ted
![]()
Gero1369
August 19, 2010 at 2:06pm
That'd be fun! Hell, I'd even take a machine with 2 or more processors.
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.















