Google Instant is Improving Ad Revenues, but was that the Motivation?

Google Instant is arguably one of the biggest changes to the search engine landscape since Google went mainstream back in 1998, but analysts are starting to question if it was really to enhance the user experience, or if it was simply a cash grab. Search management platform provider Marin Software who is responsible for over $1.3 billion in online advertising investments has just released their updated stats, and it appears as though Google might just be on to something here. Marin claims paid ad impressions have risen by 9 percent, and the actual click through rate has increase by more than 5 percent. These stats translate into what is estimated to be a 2 percent increase in overall revenues for Google, through even this is open to debate.
Google is a public company, so the motivation to increase profits is a foregone conclusion, however Google denies instant search was a profit driven decision. A Google spokesperson told eWEEK they wouldn’t comment on “individual firms or campaigns”, however they did have a few choice words for the so-called “analysts”. "We launched Instant because it's so much better for the user. In fact, from a revenue standpoint, its impact has been very minimal; and from a resource standpoint, it's actually pretty expensive. So why did we do it? Well, we believe from a user standpoint, Instant is outstanding and the data that we are seeing actually bears this out."
So now that you’ve seen both sides of the coin do you think Google Instant was a revenue play, user driven, or a bit of both?
Comments
Comments are closed on this article
![]()
tfox
November 12, 2010 at 8:05pm
I have to agree with Google on this one. Marin's statements make it clear that advertisers are raking in the cash from Instant. However, the same is not true for Google. A 2% increase ($380 million) in gross revenue sounds like a lot until you consider that their cost have risen about 118% ($10 billion) since 2006. Let's face it, $380 million to Google is like $76 to the rest of us. It's enough for a nice dinner for two at a decent restaurant, but that's about it.Now as to weather or not Instant is worth anything. I conduct several hours of internet research every week and I have used Google since it’s launch in 1998. I know how this search engine is supposed to behave. And I can say without reservation that Instant is a disaster. The response time of Google was never a real problem. Most searches were completed in under 1 second. And they were usually very accurate. Now Google completes a search in about 1/5th the time. But the results are near useless. I have experienced the following problems... Search terms are frequently ignored, quotation marks are always ignored, relevance ranking is rarely if ever applied, Google mis-navigates and Google locks up. A research project that used to take 1-2 hours now takes three times as long.
![]()
Techrocket9
November 06, 2010 at 12:42pm
So if Instant not only makes search better but also earns Google more money, is it a bad thing? Why is this news?
![]()
pwdurhama
November 06, 2010 at 12:30pm
anything to reduce typing on a small screen is a win for the user.
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.

















