Print
Circa: 2005
We were perfectly content with computing on 20” 1600x1200 CRTs until this game-changer came along. Dell’s reasonably priced 2405FPW brought 1900x1200 gaming to the masses and made wide-screen a must for enthusiasts. Not only did this panel deliver excellent image quality (with minimal ghosting and color banding), the 24” 2405FPW sported an array of alternate video inputs so you could plug PC, consoles, and DVD player into one monitor. Not to mention that it was several hundred dollars cheaper than the [slightly smaller] Apple Cinema HD display, and included USB and memory card slots to boot.
Circa: 2006
Waking out of its Netburst slumber, Intel took the CPU world by storm with its Core 2 architecture. Instead of remaining fixated on higher clockspeeds, Intel refocused its attention on being more efficient with its pipeline. This meant a return to lower clockspeeds, however it also meant a return to prominence as the performance king. After Prescott failed to live up to its hype, the media remained cautiously optimistic that Core 2 could live up to Intel's promised performance gains, but much to the chagrin of AMD, Core 2 lived up to its billing, and then some.
The first Core 2 Conroes burst out of the gates with 167 million transistors, a 65nm manufacturing process, 2MB of L2 cache, and a 1,066MHz frontside bus. Despite debuting at just 1.86GHz and 2.13GHz (E6300 and E6400, respectively), Core 2's performance made it instantly attractive, and Intel's aggressive pricing sealed the deal.
Circa: November 2006
Once it solidified its lead over ATI in graphics cards, Nvidia made its move on Intel’s performance chipsets – and for the most part succeeded. With its emphasis on overclocking, advanced southbridge features and its SLI support, the 680i SLI was the chipset to have if you wanted to build an enthusiast PC.
Sure, there were teething pains, but for most enthusiasts it was worth the sacrifice. Besides, what was the alternative? Running two Radeon X1950 cards? Feh. The 680i SLI continued to be popular until a lack of compatibility with Intel’s new 45nm quad-cores and lack of PCI-E 2.0 pushed it aside.
Circa: 2006
Featured in our 2006 Dream Machine, the shockingly fast Core 2 Extreme X6800 CPU marked Intel’s return to the “brainiac” design that emphasized performance per clock rather than insanely high clock speeds (as characterized by the Pentium 4). In a nutshell, the X6800 was wider, faster, and cooler. It’s wider because its microarchitecture was designed to process four instructions per cycle. Faster describes the Core CPU’s ability to process a 128-bit SSE instruction in a single cycle instead of the two cycles its contemporaries require. And it was designed to run cooler than its smoking-hot processors. Pit against the Athlon 64 FX-62, the X6800 took every CPU-intensive benchmark by a huge margin.
Circa: January 2007
Billed as one of the first DirectX 10-capable 3D accelerators, the GeForce 8800 series of GPUs are nearly as memorable because they represented a quantum leap in performance for DirectX 9 games. Graphics cards like this overclocked ASUS EN8800 GTX first went on sale in early 2007, but there weren't any DirectX 10 titles to play. There was, however, a glut of incredibly system-intensive DirectX 9 games. Games like Oblivion and Company of Heroes crushed the mightiest of DirectX 9-era 3D accelerators; but the 8800 GTX provided enough GPU juice to run every DirectX 9 title at the highest resolutions. And, later that year when the first true DirectX 10 titles shipped, that same GPU also gave us the first taste of fully programmable graphics, although likely at a pretty low resolution.
Circa: May 2007
The Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000 was the first SATA hard drive to break the 1 TB barrier. Sure, a terabyte isn’t really that much bigger than 750 gigabytes, but there’s definitely something to be said for the psychological impact of moving up into a whole new unit of measurement. Also, the 1 TB Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000 was the drive that really demonstrated the capabilities of the new perpendicular magnetic recording technique, the technology that allowed for the higher-density platters needed for a 1TB drive, and birthed a series of delightfully trippy flash cartoons.
Circa: 2007
When consumer-targeted 30-inch desktop LCD monitors emerged in 2007, we were supremely disappointed that these monstrous widescreens lacked an internal scaler. Convention monitor-scaling technology wasn’t powerful enough to drive the 30” panels’ 2560x1600 resolution, so they were all restricted to dual-link DVI interfaces with no on-screen display options. Gateway surprised us by being the first company to release a 30” panel with a built-in scaler, in this case a Silion Optix HQV Teranex Realta processing chipset. In layman’s terms, that meant this chip allowed the XHD3000 to support numerous interface options, an onscreen calibration controls, and even picture-in-picture functionality. HDCP support let us play high-def video in its intended resolution, and gaming on this monster was a pleasure. And at launch, the XHD3000 was actually cheaper than alternatives from Apple and Dell.
Comments are closed on this article
SH1
August 02, 2009 at 1:42pm
Long time reader, but somehow missed this article. When I belatedly saw it, I knew the GDM-F520 would certainly get a mention. However, I was very surprised to see your disclaimer above.
A pre-emptive defensive strike against how "uncool" such massive beasts are today?
Check out this long running thread regarding its also highly regarded sibling, GDM-FW900:
http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=952788
and let's reflect on the sad fact that on several key image quality performance measures, such CRTs are still far superior to this day...
da_samman
July 16, 2009 at 11:54am
I remember when I yearned for an FX-62 CPU in my rig, and then for a long time I yearned for a Penryn CPU. Now, it seems, that my loyalty to AMD is being reborn, thanks to the Phenom II X4. Just curious, what is it about Intel's quad cores that make them better than the Phenom II X-4 equivalents? Heck, the price alone for a Phenom II should sway SOME die-hard Intel fanboys, especially with our current economic situation.
Sincerely yours, from Fort Lewis, WA
SGT Samuel E. McClard II
Life's a journey, enjoy the ride!!
JDorfler
June 06, 2009 at 1:17am
This is a great list. How about one list for each kind of component from their humble beginnings and to their high speed present to where we may believe they maybe going.
Sager NP5797 (Clevo)
nVidia GeForce 9800 GTX/Intel QX9300/4GB DDR3 1066
Vista/Ubuntu/Fedora OSes
AMD64Blondie
May 12, 2009 at 5:09pm
I'd also like to point out the Sony FW900/9012 24-in widescreen CRT in high-end CRT monitors. (How do I know? I own one of these fabulous 93-lb widescreen wonders.)(Although,mine's a HP A7217A which is a rebadged Sony FW9012). Also,in keyboards.. you forgot to mention the IBM Model M. I personally own 3 of these lovely antiques. (2 1991 Model Ms,and a 1995 Model M).
Terabit
May 09, 2009 at 10:02pm
Wow, I just now realized how fast techonology is being updated and improved. The 8800GTX is already considered old tech. Jeez, I remember when the FX-55 and the Pentium 4 Extreme came out! I didn't realize how long ago that was.
2X EVGA GeForce GTX 285 1GB (Each) | Intel Core i7 920 | OCZ Gold 6GB DDR3 1600 | Asus P6T Deluxe V2 Mobo | Seagate Barracuda 1TB HD | Corsair 850watt PSU | Antec Twelvehundred Black Full Tower Case | Asus VW246H Black 24" 2ms Monitor |
anonuser
May 07, 2009 at 7:28am
Don't totally really agree with the list. The original Hayes modem set the standard and Logitech should get the nod in the mouse department.
Had a 1GB Fireball. It outlasted many other drives. I gave it away in hand-me-down rig to a relative.
ABIT BE6 (440BX) was in the first computer I built myself and it was rock solid until it melted down because I was unaware dust had completely encrusted and choked every heatsink. Now I seal, filter, & +pressure every case.
440BXs are still completely viable with, 128MB of RAM, any old 3D AGP video card, LAN card, and a Puppy Linux OS making it even seem snappy. I rebuilt a couple's old 440BX computer with old spare parts & Puppy - they were amazed!
Lowell J. Haffner
May 06, 2009 at 9:34pm
When I purchased a used K6-2 450mhz computer to be able to get on the internet, one of the first upgrades I made was to get a Microsoft Natural Keyboard Pro keyboard. I have built several computers since for myself and a few for my wife but the keyboard came along when I upgraded. As I sit in front of my dual-processor AMD Athlon X2 4000+ / AsusM2NBP-VM mobo, black Antec 900 case with all black accessories, I sit at the 'boring beige', very same keyboard. I might consider a new keyboard someday, but I haven't found one that was more comfortable or more durable. So you won't think I am a Microsoft fanboy, I still run XP MCE 2005 dual booting with Ubuntu 9.04. The more I learn about Open Source software, the more I figure that XP will be my last MS OS.The Vista fumble was too much.
haffcrazy
jeffhex
May 06, 2009 at 3:35pm
Still have a working BP6 mobo with dual Celeron 533 CPUs in it... retired it recently (anyone want it?). Any my A8N-SLI Deluxe mobo was running my main gaming machine until about a year ago. Now it is repurposed as another server on my network, running folding@home while downloading bittorrent files. Even had an old ABIT BE6 mobo (440BX chipset) but the capacitors blew and it would have cost more to fix it than replace it.
Keep up the good work, MaximumPC!
(oh, and the 100th podcast was EXCELLENT!)
Spider-Mom
May 06, 2009 at 3:25pm
"And, later that year when the first true DirectX 10 titles shipped,
that same GPU also gave us the first taste of fully programmable
graphics, although likely at a pretty low resolution."
Mine still plays everythign just fine at 1920-1200. Games like DMC4, Stalker, Fallout3 all get great FPS WITH AA and ANSIOx16 except for stalker but that game is crap optimized. DMC4 looks better than stalker and gets a solid 60FPS.
dylanwinn
May 05, 2009 at 10:12pm
Ahh... I love going back and playing those old games. The fact that modern hardware can bust out 500+ FPS on the same game that we once struggled to run at 15 FPS smells like progress.
It's also funny when games run faster than refresh-rate. How is that even possible?
FusilliJerry82
May 05, 2009 at 7:20pm
After a nuclear apocolypse, a 440BX based PC would still be running somewhere, its screen glowing on the skeleton slumped forward in the chair at the desk on which it sits.
Trooper_One
May 05, 2009 at 12:59pm
So many good fond memories! (not all, but lots or lots from their derivatifs)
My favourites were Celeron 300A, the Abit NF7-S with a Barton 2500+ easily overclocked to 3200+ (which btw, stills runs as a secondary guest machine, surfing the web, Folding@Home, PopCap games by G/F, and other minor games).
I'm just surprised that there's no mention of any Creative Lab's SoundBlaster -did MPC had a fight with CL and had something against them? Yes, there were lots of good quality soundcards out there (including the above mentioned Diamond) but SB did put up the foundation of PC gaming. Not to mention I have a wide assortments of SB soundcards from the SB Pro tho the SB X-Fi series! (I also have a few Diamod Monster and a Turtle Beach sitting in a box).
Btw, has anyone tried hooking up their old Voodoo2's and try to create something crazy with them?
ogremustcrush
May 05, 2009 at 12:31pm
Ah, my good friend, the Abit NF7-S. When I get home today I'm going to put you in yet another different case as I replace my main rigs case and they trickle down. That board and a 2.2Ghz Athlon XP with 1GB of ram actually manages to run Windows 7 quite acceptably. That box needs a new hdd, unfortunatly, but the NF7-S lives forever with the proper tender loving care. I have had to replace the northbridge heatsink on it, and I also epoxied a heatsink to the southbridge, but it's been solid other than that. I have the other good Nforce 2 board from that era too, the Asus A7N8X Deluxe 2.0, but it will never get as much love as the NF7-S.
rcwerner
May 05, 2009 at 11:32am
Came out the same time as Voodoo and could do gorgeous 3D and 2D in ONE card. Voodoo may have had a frame or two edge in performance, but the the Verite colors were simply beautiful.
I think I still have my card.
Techie714
May 05, 2009 at 9:07am
Great article guys! Max PC has been turning out some good stuff lately!
three6mafia1665
May 05, 2009 at 8:31am
I've got a few things on this list still running strong! I've got the sound blaster 1998 card (has it really been that long?) still running great in my girlfriends XP based machine. I'm also still using a 32gb Raptor as my operating system drive that has to be on its last leg, I mean 6 years of 10,000 rpms has to do some damage. And perhaps most impressivly, I am still running a mircosoft inteliexplorer 3.0. Sure the wires shorted and the feet are ground into the base, but that didn't stop me from rewiring it and throwing some new feet on it. Very shocked to see that i'm using some PC parts 11, 6, and 10 years old. Props to companies who make a lasting product.
Mikey1091
May 05, 2009 at 5:14am
I'm quite dissatisfied that I didn't notice a singe one of AMD's latest processors listed in the last two pages of this article. Seems to me that MPC just went and said screw AMD, we like Intel. Wonder how many AMD fans that this will anger, myself included. But since I didnt ask the question, and it is likely no one will for a while, WHY wasn't any of AMD's latest processors listed, while pretty much all of Intel's were?
Cheap Web Hosting from Nova Internet Services! http://www.novaservices.biz/
Keith E. Whisman
May 05, 2009 at 11:32pm
The 50 Most Important PC Components of the Modern Computing Era
That's what the Title of this Article is. I'm sorry but the Phenom just isn't the most important PC Component of the Modern PC era. Not when Intel produced the simply bad assed Core I7. They do have the Athlon 64 up there. The Athlon XP is up there as well. Very important components that directed the PC market. If you want a 64bit Operating system such as Windows Vista or Win7 64bit you need a processor that is compatible with the Athlon 64. Intel has an AMD license called IA64 that allows Intel processors to run a 64bit OS. That is pretty damn important and therefore you shouldn't get pissed off at all. I believe AMD is pretty well represented here.
skramblr
May 08, 2009 at 7:40pm
" Intel has an AMD license called IA64 that allows Intel processors to run a 64bit OS."
??? Me thinks you have your facts mixed up. IA64 is Intel's Itanium Processor. Nothing to do with AMD.
Keith E. Whisman
May 11, 2009 at 8:42am
64bit on consumer processors comes to us courtesy of a license extended to Intel from AMD because Microsoft Adopted only AMD's 64bit technology for it's 64Bit Windows OS's.
For a long time if you wanted to run WinXP 64bit Edition you had to use an AMD Athlon 64 CPU.
I was wrong about the name. I always thought it was IA64. It had a name that sounded close to that.
From what I found it's called X86-64 and the official name is just lost to me. I can't for the life of me remember what the name of the AMD 64 technology that was licensed to Intel. Intel I believe changed the name slightly that is why I though IA64. I can't remember so please forgive the ignorence. I'm not trying to spread inaccurate information.
jwalch.hawk
May 14, 2009 at 8:31pm
skramblr is right on this one, though nearly everyone makes the same mistake you did.
IA-64 is a totally different 64-bit processor architecture that is particular to the Intel Itanium. Binaries (ie, code compiled clear down to the 1s and 0s) written for an x86 processor was not compatible with it, which is why it was pretty much a failure. Today's 64-bit processors are on a 64-bit extension of the standard x86 architecture (pretty sure it's called x86-64 like you said), which means that it's just basically the 64-bit version of the same old architecture. Your flashy new Core i7 is more compatible with the original 8086 than it would be with the Itanium. Bottom line is that Itanium was a screwball and doesn't really have much to do with 64-bit processors as we currently know them.
Havok
May 05, 2009 at 6:32am
Imean, I like AMD. But seriously, when was the last time they actually spanked Intel in recent years? Phenom ring a bell? Don't get me wrong, I loved it when those old Athlons came out a couple years back and whupped Intel, but that was like 5 years ago.
I'm still a believer though. Just wait for Phenom III!
OMGWTFBBQ
Havok
May 05, 2009 at 4:42am
Wonder if Maclife could compete with this awesomeness? Oh, that's right.... they can't show a parts list, because you can't hotswap parts in a Mac like in a PC.
Aw shucks :)
OMGWTFBBQ
johnny3144
May 05, 2009 at 7:18pm
i am sure they can make a list about something like the most important mac computer history or something... but to make a list this long, they gotta put every freaking mac that's ever made on it.
korhojoa
May 05, 2009 at 12:23am
I'm not sure exactly who's card that is, or in which maximum pc it has been, but I'm pretty confident that it's a MPEG2 decoder card.
I have a old realmagic one that looks quite close to that one.
Keith E. Whisman
May 04, 2009 at 11:07pm
Over the years I've owned much of what was posted in this article. It makes me realize just how much stuff I've given away over the years. I would use my old hardware to upgrade friends and family computers after I upgraded my hardware.
I recently gave away an 875Pro based Motherboard with a P4C 3ghz processor, 2gigs of ram and a Geforce 6800GTS Pro Video Card and a creative sound blaster audigy 2ZS sound card to friends, family and a fellow MaximumPC forum troll.
rpepper
May 05, 2009 at 7:35am
I feel you here. This was a great trip down memory lane. I was surprised to see my old FIC SD11 show up. I never knew that board was a "milestone" of any sort in anyone's eyes. I still remember building my first PC...Athlon Slot A 750GHz T-Bird on the FIC board with a SB Live! and 256MB PC133 SDRAM and a Voodoo5 5500. I was the envy of all my friends!
Thanks for making my morning coffee break give me that warm fuzzy feeling of nostalgia MPC!
