Tech Preview 2012: The PC's Bright Future
The Future Is Bright

Forget everything you’ve heard about the PC being dead
The onslaught of smartphones, tablets, and sundry cloud-based devices might give us ways to be “connected” in more places at more times, but they don’t lessen the wonders to behold in a full-fledged PC. Not by a long shot.
In fact, despite all the dire prognostications about the PC, our personal computers are poised to get a major boost in performance, thanks to all the new technologies and components coming to fruition next year. We’re going to give you the complete rundown on what to expect—can someone say fastest CPU ever?—so you can start plotting your next build now.
Oh, we’ll still see plenty of tablets, to be sure, and we’ll tell you how those happening slabs will change, but we’re also going to see a major push by Intel to make stylish, super-portable, super-affordable laptop PCs an even more compelling option.
Yes, there’s a lot to look forward to in 2012. And you can start peeping at what lies ahead right here!
Intel Sandy Bridge-E
Welcome to the future of performance computing
True performance enthusiasts have had a very difficult choice this past year. Go for maximum core and thread count using an older core microarchitecture, or cheap out and get almost the same (or better) performance in most apps and games using the mainstream Sandy Bridge chip.
That, in a nutshell, has been the enthusiasts’ dilemma ever since Intel introduced the Sandy Bridge chip in January 2011. Well those days are behind us now that Intel has finally, finally released its Sandy Bridge-E (for Enthusiast) chip. With one simple chip—the new 3.3GHz Core i7-3960X—Intel has neatly folded up all those worries and put them into a nice little blue box stamped with the Intel logo.
A TRUE ENTHUSIASTS' CPU
Boiled down to the simplest of terms, if the quad-core 3.4GHz Core i7-2600K (or its new sibling the 3.5GHz Core i7-2700K) was the best chip out there, the Core i7-3960X is now the bestest. That’s because the Core i7-3960X is simply a Core i7-2600K with two additional cores.
Actually, that’s not really accurate. As an enthusiast chip, there are no graphics cores in the Core i7-3960X. And while the Core i7-2600K is limited to just 16 PCIe 2.0 lanes, the Core i7-3960X sports 40. Even better, those 40 lanes of PCIe support are PCIe 3.0 compliant. Out the gate, however, Intel (or its lawyers, anyway) is reluctant to label them as PCIe 3.0 until it actually has enough PCIe 3.0 cards to test.

Intel's Sandy Bridge-E blends the best of both worlds: it has the core and thread count of a Core i7-990X Gulftown proc and the core performance of a Core i7-2600K Sandy Bridge.
As to the cores, you already know about them. They’re Sandy Bridge cores and include AVX and AES-NI instruction-set goodness. Turbo Boost 2.0 on these models will take the top-end 3.3GHz Core i7-3960X to 3.9GHz. The cores are built using Intel’s 32nm process and, well, there are two more of them turned on.
Besides the added cores, enthusiasts will also be thrilled by the memory support: To keep those cores fed, Intel is using a new quad-channel memory controller. The memory controller seems significantly faster than previous iterations, too. While the tri-channel memory controller in the original LGA1366 didn’t blow our socks off (over a dual-channel configuration), the quad-channel controller in the Core i7-3960X has us stunned. In our tests, we found that it offered nearly 100 percent more memory bandwidth than the Core i7-990X’s triple-channel configuration.
PSSST, IT'S REALLY EIGHT CORES INSIDE
Intel isn’t making the Core i7-3960X just to satiate the appetites of speed freaks. The chip is mostly intended to be sold as a Xeon workstation CPU. So it shouldn’t surprise you that the Core i7-3960X is actually an eight-core chip. Yup, that’s right; looking at the block map of the chip, you can see that the new CPU has two sections blocked out where cores seven and eight go. Why leave them off? Intel officially says the decision was based on its desire to balance clock speeds, thermals, and power needs. We suspect that it’s really because Intel doesn’t need those two extra cores at this point. Not to telegraph too much, but AMD hasn’t posed much performance competition yet. By leaving cores off now, Intel can always introduce octo-core chips later if it needs to be more competitive. There could also truly be a thermal concern, as unsubstantiated rumors (are there any other kind?) initially told of Intel’s new chip pushing an unheard‑of 180‑watt thermal rating.
Yeah, we know what you’re thinking already, because we asked the same thing ourselves: Can you unlock those two other cores? Negative, Ghostrider. Intel has laser-cut those cores off in the die, so unless someone has the smallest‑possible soldering gun, we’d bet a box of adamantium claws that it’s impossible.
MEET THE NEW PLATFORM

Don't rub your eyes: There really are eight cores on that monstrous 32nm die. And no, you can't unlock the bottom two, except in your wildest dreams.
As is Intel’s modus operandi, the company has a new socket. While the switch from LGA1156 to LGA1155 certainly pissed off customers, the LGA1366 crowd can hardly complain. LGA1366 launched with the original Core i7-965 Extreme Edition way back in 2008. For Intel to even support a socket that long is almost unheard of. So, with Core i7-3960X, Intel is introducing its new LGA2011.
Why the extra pins? The additional pins in the socket are to support the quad-channel memory and the relocation of the PCIe lanes from the core-logic chipset to the CPU core (à la Sandy Bridge and Lynnfield). For the most part, enthusiasts will be tickled pink with the beastly new socket, the quad-channel memory, and PCIe 3.0. What they won’t be happy with is the SATA 6Gb/s situation. The new X79 chipset features a Serial Attached SCSI controller that can support up to 10 drives in SATA 6Gb/s, but at the 11th hour, the feature was switched off due to compatibility concerns. Instead, we’re left with an X79 peripheral controller hub that’s pretty much a weak-sauce retread of the P67 and Z68’s PCH: two SATA 6Gb/s and four SATA 3Gb/s ports. You can certainly argue that you don’t need more than two SATA 6Gb/s ports since they’re only useful for SSD drives, but we think it stinks, especially as we had been teased by thoughts of motherboards bursting with SATA 6Gb/s. We expect initial boards to be limited in SATA 6Gb/s ports due to the last-minute switch, but in a few months, board vendors will tack on additional ports using third-party controllers. If anything, the SATA 6Gb/s features on boards and how they’re implemented will separate the men from the boys in mobo land.
MEET THE SANDY BRIDGE-E FAMILY
For the LGA2011 platform, Intel is introducing three new chips: The top-end Core 7-3960X at $990—yup, that’s $9 cheaper than the existing Core i7-990X chip (gee thanks, Intel!) that this Extreme chip is meant to replace. Intel is also introducing two other chips. The mid-tier 3.2GHz Core i7-3930K will sell for $555. Besides the lower stock clock, the chip will shed some of the L3 cache, for a total of 12MB. For the budget enthusiast, Intel has plans to release a quad-core, Hyper-Threaded Sandy Bridge-E with 10MB of L3 cache early next year. Prices of the Core i7-3820 haven’t been released, but we’re pretty sure it’ll slot in at about $300. The part is “partially unlocked,” meaning it will have limited overclocking features, and is likely intended as a way to get entry-level enthusiasts in the X79 game.
The good news for enthusiasts is that Intel has no plans to step away from offering blistering‑fast chips with cutting-edge technology, despite all the focus on tablets and smartphones these days. Hallelujah.
| Intel Core i7-2600K | Intel Core i7-990X | Intel Core i7-3960X | AMD Phenom II X6 1100T | AMD FX-8150 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clock | 3.4GHz | 3.46GHz | 3.3GHz | 3.3GHz | 3.6GHz |
| Turbo Clock (Max) | 3.8GHz | 3.7GHz | 3.9GHz | 3.7GHz | 3.9GHz (4.2GHz) |
| TDP | 95 watts | 130 watts | 130 watts | 125 watts | 125 watts |
| Cores / Threads | 4 /8 | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 | 6 | 8 |
| Volume Pricing | $317 | $999 | $990 | $205 | $245 |
| Process | 32nm | 32nm | 32nm | 45nm | 32nm |
| Total L2 Cache | 1MB | 1.5MB | 1.5MB | 3MB | 8MB |
| Total L3 Cache | 8MB | 12MB | 15MB | 6MB | 8MB |
| Die Size | 216mm2 | 240mm2 | 435mm2 | 346mm2 | 315mm2 |
| Transistor Count | 995 million | 1.17 billion | 2.27 billion | 904 million | 2 billion |
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1366 | LGA2011 | Socket AM3 | Socket AM3+ |
| Memory Controller | Dual Channel DDR3/1333 | Tri-Channel DDR3/1066 | Quad-Channel DDR3/1600 | Dual Channel DDR3/1333 | Dual Channel DDR3/1866 |
Comments
Comments are closed on this article
![]()
Nexing
December 14, 2011 at 5:30am
Software and apps/peripheral wise, at 2012 we are getting to the point where the "ecosystem" is rendering substantial new functionalities: Parrot-style Skype following you while you walk around the house by the TV, Kitchen, etc.
Think of voice differenciating, allowing for data to be shown on a screen at a work meeting depending on speaker commands whoever she/he is, or Excel filling data by voice and touch combinations... Yes, Excel and touch seem like a perfect match, the same way WORD and Voice will also easily fit.Technologies like handwriting and voice recognition, speak to text, facial and partial body recognition, motion and voice activated features, bio and NeuroControl.
are all already mature to have existing products on the shelves:
http://www.gamesradar.com/mindwave-a...r-now-on-sale/
To show the rarest.
But to hint the functionalities now at reach, better read on some new functions of recently released 2nd Kinect SDK, of which apps are starting what seems to become a BIG Wave:
*Sound source localization for beamforming, which enables the determination of a sound’s spatial location, enhancing reliability when integrated with the Microsoft speech recognition API.
*Depth data, which provides the distance of an object from the Kinect camera.
*Highly performant and robust skeletal tracking capabilities for determining the body positions of one or two persons moving within the Kinect field of view.What we expect in Windows 8 is an OS that actually facilitates the interconnection and merge of all these techs, allowing for new functions and vast efficiency improvements into one environment applicable to multiple devices, at the center of will be the PC and around it; phones, house appliances, TVs, sound systems, electrical everything, etc (connected via small wireless IP little thingies).
To me this is not just creating an ecosystem, its allowing for the Evolution of Era in control and IT funcionalities. This is not just about fast and compatibility. it is about radical new functions and ways of doing the old and new.
////One good example of how this evolution comes to be possible, is The Touchable Hologram. It has been in our fantasies since the 70s, and several attempts have been tried by adding soundwaves, air pressure shaping and who knows what else to "densify them". However now
http://www.mobiledia.com/news/113457.html
Technicians left holograms in their physical band while adding Kinect and CPU to it, allowing for precise in air control from users wanting to interact...with whatever an hologram conveys... This is the kind of new capacities found with the interaction of several techniques, instead of trying to force certain technology, device or software, to do it all by itself.
![]()
TheBigOldDog
December 13, 2011 at 7:05pm
articles were written saying the minicomputer would never displace mainframes. It did and lots of companies died. Then decades later, articles were written how the pc would never displace the mini. It did. more companies disappeared. Now articlea are being written about how tablets and mobile devices won't displace the PC. what are the chances this time they are right?
ironically Andy Grove was known for saying only the paranoid survive and his take on historic inflection points and here Intel sits on the wrong side of It along with the other hlf of the once WinTel monopoly.
Professor Clay Christensen is well known fornhis theories explaining this phenomenon . entrenched companies ignore the disruptivs technology in the beginning because It's not really seen as a serious threat and their customers aren't really considering It in any meaningful way. I then they wake up one day and the whole world changes and they are on the outside looking in. I to have that happen to Intel of all companies just shows It can happen to anyone.
![]()
praetor_alpha
December 13, 2011 at 7:35pm
Articles were also written about how BluRay would fail, because it's Sony, and 'remember what happened with Betamax?' How many other things have come, been hailed as the next big thing, but didn't?
The thing that's different between mainframes, minicomputers, and PCs, is that PCs are based on open standards, and are a mass market item, not restricted to businesses. There will always be a market for a high performance device (PCs), as evidenced by people taking up PC gaming and leaving their 360s to red ring.
![]()
unsunghero225
December 13, 2011 at 8:23am
Like the article...
Not my cup of tea though, built a rig about 6 months ago w/ a 2500k (nothing fancy but lotta bang for the buck). I'm very happy with it, there are not many programs that I can't run with top notch graphics and settings.
So while these new chips will in all likelyhood shred my current setup, for me personally I see no reason to get all antsy when I'm not using anything that will require that kind of power anyways...
![]()
praetor_alpha
December 13, 2011 at 7:11am
I don't plan on swapping my i7 2600 out anytime soon. We still need better multithreaded and 64 bit apps (I'm looking at you, Skyrim). Might pick up one of those GPUs, if I absolutely want 60 fps on highest.
![]()
h e x e n
December 13, 2011 at 5:51am
Again, killer article guys. Nice to know whats's coming down the pipe in the next year or two. What I'd really like to see is SSD's reach practical price points in comparison to traditional platter drives. They have gotten SOOOOO much cheaper since their inception, but the prices still need to come down. I'm hopeful I can get a 1TB drive within the next couple of years without spending a small fortune.
Hell, the 480gb drives cost nearly half of what I built my entire rig for. For desktop storage, that is ludicrous.
![]()
MrHasselblad
December 12, 2011 at 7:54pm
Well before the end of 2012 we'll see more versions of mainstream laptops able to run at three point whatever ghz times six; for a combined rating at about 20. Now if I could only convince Apple to offer user interchangeable and hot-swap batteries in their devices
![]()
Badass1982
December 12, 2011 at 3:20pm
To be honest , the Xeons will destroy ALL of these "DESKTOP" chips, you should look into the 8 core Xeons that are as of yet unreleased (I.E. this years versions of the chips that were in the dream machine a few years back) as usual they will smoke the desktop chips, be 8 cores and generally have 2 QPI's so you can use 2 chips in 1 system UNLIKE the single QPI (meaning they cannot "talk" to other CPU's) that the "desktop" chips have!
Just my 2 cents
Martin
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.


















