Super Size Me: 16 Massive and Mini Computers
In the world of computers, size does matter. Both ways.
Computers, like people, come in all shapes and sizes. Except you've never seen people who tip the scales at 200-plus tons. Or expand so radically they essentially cover the earth. Or shrink so small they're no longer visible.
Or have you? If so, put down the medication. Immediately. And seek help. Lots and lots of help.
And then come back and continue reading. For today we're going to look at the extremes. The smallest. The fattest. The most grandiose. And all things between—including a couple of quick jaunts down memory lane that'll have you pining for the innocent days of olde.
Like a contestant on The Biggest Loser, we'll start big and go small. And what better way to lead off than with the glove-covering giant some out-of-the-box thinkers claim is the biggest computing setup ever designed.
Comments
Comments are closed on this article
![]()
dramsey
December 09, 2011 at 10:28pm
The Apple I was delivered as a naked circuit board; the wooden case shown in your image was built by whomever owned that particular version. You also had to provide your own power supply, keyboard, and monitor.
![]()
Belboz99
December 09, 2011 at 10:09pm
SETI@Home != Folding@Home!!!
Most of what you're describing is Folding@Home, a project out of Stanford University.
Seriously, someone should get shot for mangling their facts like this!
![]()
roadshow41
December 10, 2011 at 3:47am
SETI@ and Folding@ are completley different. SETI is based at UC Berkley and is exactly what the author describes, a distrubuted computing platform that searches for ET. Folding@ is indeed based at Stanford, but uses the idle cycles to run protein folding simulations in hopes of discovering potential disease treatements. Same basic idea, completely different applications. So ... before you go all postal on the MPC staff, set the phasers back to stun and do a little fact checking of your own there skippy.
![]()
the_geekboy
December 10, 2011 at 11:03am
The author specifically introduces folding... which refers to the Protein folding calculations that Folding@Home does -- then concludes that this is what SETI@Home is doing. He seems to imply that "Folding" describes that style of distributed computing, when it is definitely not so. I'm with Belboz99 on this one. There's some crossed wires here.
![]()
TheMurph
December 10, 2011 at 1:52pm
I agree here. The word "folding" specifically relates to the concept of protein folding, which is what the distributed software platform "Folding@Home" analyzes, but is in no way synonmous with the act of distributed computing for some greater purpose.
In other words, Seti doesn't "fold." Proteins "fold." Mixed wires, indeed.
http://www.maximumpc.com/article/features/maximum_interview_science_behind_folding_home5132
![]()
nedwards
December 10, 2011 at 2:08pm
Belboz99 et al: you are correct. Seti doesn't fold. I've fixed the slide.
Nobody's getting shot, though. That seems a little harsh.
![]()
b_c_pc
December 09, 2011 at 2:35pm
I don' t think the circa 2000 Ericsson R380 was the first smartphone. I think it might have been the circa 1995/1996 Nokia 9000 running the GEOS operating system.
![]()
AETAaAS
December 09, 2011 at 2:24pm
Holy hell, that @Tokyo hallway is quite striking. You almost expect a computerised voice from above to say; "Hello and welcome to the Enrichment Center"
![]()
praetor_alpha
December 09, 2011 at 3:44pm
It needs to have white floors, walls, and ceilings, and I will freak out.
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.

























