Router Roundup: We Review 7 Top-Tier Routers
Today's premium Wi-Fi routers push the boundaries of design, features, and range
You’ve been getting by with the cheapie router you bought two years ago, so why should you upgrade now? In a word: Performance. And features. Oh, sorry. That’s two words. We looked at a host of budget offerings in our last router roundup (February 2010) and didn’t find much to get excited about. This time, we asked seven manufacturers to send us the best consumer routers in their stables regardless of price tags.

If aesthetics matter in your router, you're sure to find a design that suits your style, although its performance might not be up to snuff. Hey, that's why we're here.
In most cases, that meant a simultaneous dual-band router capable of running 802.11n wireless networks using the typical 2.4GHz frequency band and the less-crowded 5GHz band, plus a guest network that isolates its clients from your primary LAN. In all cases, it meant a router with an integrated four-port gigabit switch and at least one USB port for sharing a printer or a storage device over the network (some have two USB ports to support both functions). In an interesting twist, however, no one submitted a product using a three-stream wireless chipset promising raw throughput of 450Mb/s.
We’re absolutely fine with that, because our first experience with this bleeding-edge standard, courtesy of Trendnet’s single-band TEW-691GR, left a bitter taste on our tongues. The TEW-691GR was very fast, but only at very close range. As we observed in our review, you can’t buy a USB Wi-Fi adapter with three antennas today, so much of that extra bandwidth is effectively wasted.
Astute observers will notice that we’ve previously written stand-alone reviews of three of the routers here—namely, the Netgear WNDR3700 V1 (our current Best of the Best pick), the Linksys E3000 (previously known as the WRT610N), and the Belkin Play N600 HD (previously known as the Play Max). Since wireless performance varies with Wi-Fi client device drivers, router firmware updates, and even atmospheric conditions, we didn’t think it would be fair to compare one product with the latest updates to a competitor we reviewed several months ago.
So, will Netgear’s WNDR3700 V1 retain its title, or will a scrappy challenger exceed our lofty expectations? Keep reading to find out.
Jump to page 3 for the benchmarks.
Asus RT-N16
A solid, if unexciting, bargain
The Asus RT-N16 is a single-band router with three removable (and therefore upgradeable) antennas, but the third antenna didn’t help the router rise above third place overall in terms of TCP throughput. It did, however, do a solid job of penetrating our media room.
The RT-N16 is equipped with two USB ports, so it can support both a portable USB hard drive and a printer. USB storage devices are shared using SMB/CIFS, so the shares appear when you use Windows to browse your network. This is a far superior alternative to forcing you to install a client to access the shares, as some of the other routers do.

The Asus RT-N16 is a solid performer with dual USB ports, strong firmware, and support from the DD-WRT community.
Asus has developed a very user-friendly GUI for the RT-N16’s firmware, and the EZQoS utility makes it easy to assign bandwidth priority to various applications (with settings for VoIP, games, video streaming, and the built-in FTP server). There’s an integrated BitTorrent client, too. If the stock firmware doesn’t float your boat, you can replace it with a version of the popular open-source alternative DD-WRT.
The RT-N16’s stock firmware includes a UPnP media server, but it’s not DLNA-compliant. This means the router is not a great choice if you’re looking to stream media from an attached drive to an Xbox 360 or a PS3 gaming console.
You’ll find our complete Asus RT-N16 network and NAS benchmark results here.
| Radio Frequencies | Single-band: 2.4GHz only |
| Guest Network | No |
| DLNA-Compliant Media Server | No |
| USB Ports | Two (for printer and/or storage) |
| NTFS Drive Support | Yes |
| WDS Bridge/Repeater Support | No |
Decent range and throughput; dual USB ports; support from DD-WRT community; BitTorrent client.
Single-band only; no guest network; no DLNA-compliant media server.

Belkin Play N600 HD
Homey don't play dat
The Belkin Play Max’s claim to fame was a fat set of hardware features and a generous collection of apps that ran not on the router but on client PCs connected to the router. In relaunching the Play Max as the Play N600 HD, Belkin has kept all the hardware features but axed three of the apps (the music library tool Daily DJ, the backup utility Memory Safe, and the MP3 tagger Music Labeler).
No big loss, as far as we’re concerned; we’re far more interested in the hardware. Like its predecessor, the Play N600 HD features two wireless radios, so you can operate distinct networks on the 2.4- and 5GHz bands, plus a second guest network (on the 2.4GHz band only) that provides Internet access while isolating visitors from your LAN. You’ll also find two USB ports, so you can share both a mass storage device and a printer across your network (but not with clients on the guest network).

Belkin's Play N600 HD router has a single status LED that glows green when the router is connected to the Internet and amber when it can't make that connection.
The Play N600 HD’s wireless routing performance using the 2.4GHz band was distinctly middle of the road, placing third in two of our test locations and tying for third in another. On the other hand, it managed a relatively strong second-place performance in our challenging media-room test. Performance on the 5GHz band was roughly the same, except that it couldn’t penetrate our double-walled media room at all.
Belkin includes a BitTorrent client that’s useful for finishing Torrent downloads without tying up a host PC; but as you can see from our benchmark charts, the router’s NAS performance is abysmal.
You’ll find our complete Belkin Play N600 HD network and NAS benchmark results here.
| Radio Frequencies | Dual-band: 2.4GHz and 5GHz |
| Guest Network | On the 2.4GHz band only |
| DLNA-Compliant Media Server | Running on a host PC only |
| USB Ports | Two (for printer and/or storage) |
| NTFS Drive Support | Yes |
| WDS Bridge/Repeater Support | No |
Guest network; two USB ports; BitTorrent client, good range on the 2.4GHz band.
Slug-slow NAS performance; DLNA-compliant media server runs on a host PC, not the router.

Buffalo AirStation Nfiniti
This bison no longer roams
Of the three routers we’re taking second looks at, none has changed more than Buffalo’s WZR-HP-G300NH. That’s because Buffalo has thrown the firmware we tested earlier out the window and adopted the open-source DD-WRT.

We weren't impressed with the AirStation Nfiniti WZR-HP-G300NH's TCP throughput, but its price tag is a saving grace.
Comparing our earlier benchmark numbers to the performance we recorded this time out, however, we much prefer the Kick Ass award–earning router we tested in January to the one in front of us now. That router turned in the best throughput we’ve ever seen with our client in our well-insulated media room and in our furthest outdoor location; this one took fifth-place finishes in both tests (in a field of seven). We have little doubt the reason for this performance discrepancy is due to the fact that no matter how we configured the router, we couldn’t coax Buffalo’s WLI-UC-G300HP01B USB client adapter to connect to it at a stated data rate faster than 130Mb/s.
This is a single-band router that enables you to run virtual wireless networks with distinct SSIDs, but these aren’t true guest networks that provide Internet access while isolating guest clients from your primary LAN. The router is equipped with a single USB port that’s limited to NAS functions—you can’t use it to share a printer attached to your network. It does, however, feature a DLNA-compliant media server, and it can be converted to a wireless bridge/repeater when you upgrade to a newer router down the road.
You’ll find our complete Buffalo AirStation Nfiniti WZR-HP-G300NH network results here. We didn’t test NAS performance because this router doesn’t support NTFS-formatted drives.
| Radio Frequencies | Single-band: 2.4GHz only |
| Guest Network | Sort of |
| DLNA-Compliant Media Server | Yes |
| USB Ports | One (for storage only) |
| NTFS Drive Support | No |
| WDS Bridge/Repeater Support | Yes |
DLNA-compliant media server; integrated BitTorrent client; DD-WRT firmware.
Poor range; USB NAS feature supports only FAT32 or XFS formatted drives; no guest network.

Next Page: Wi-Fi Routers continued »
Comments
Comments are closed on this article
![]()
kookykrazee
November 02, 2011 at 6:57pm
Does anyone have a suggestion for a wireless N router that can handle a Maximum PC type torrent load? I have tried out 15-20 routers, but the biggest issue is not the speed throughput, but the fact that after the maximum connection are reached the wi-fi crashes. I would be intersted in any suggestion for different levels from basic to extreme that would work for me. I have even heard of some people using an old PC as a router, which might be in an interesting suggestion if anyone has some ideas with that, I would be game, too.
![]()
jackofthedust
March 21, 2011 at 8:53am
I am electronically deficient, so please keep it simple. My problem: My computer is located downstairs and my TV is upstairs. I purchased a ROKU router but apparently the distance is too great for my NetFlix movies to be "transferred" from my computer to my TV. Is there a router on the market that will solve my problem of distance and walls? If so, price would also be a factor. Thanks.
![]()
firtske
February 28, 2011 at 8:19pm
Your review is a giant joke, you don't review routers by running a benchmark.
You review routers by running them at least 1 week.
As is the case with the Netgear WNDR3700 router, what value do you have at a router which is extremely fast but goes belly up about every single day ? Indeed, nothing.
And it is indeed the fact of the wildly virussing lame "review" sites like these that companies create hardware that scores extremely well in benchmarks, but has to be rebooted every single day, and dies after a couple of months.
Shame !
![]()
cursedtalent
December 10, 2010 at 9:06pm
I need to upgrade my router, I'll probably be getting the netgear now. Im upgrading from a Linsys WRt54G and this router has been a pain to work with my xbox 360, so i'm just wondering if the Netgear is known to have many problems with this.(wow that's a lot of commas)
![]()
alfredo
November 26, 2010 at 2:25pm
I am looking to move into an n router that allows me to connect my printer to the router/ network. Belkin N600 HD looked good, but was absolutely destroyed by user reviews on BestBuy- says router loses connection, has to continually be reset, and this renders it useless by hassle. But I also want a router that is DLNA compliant, as I'll likely move into connecting a new TV to my network. Netgear WNDR 3700 doesn't allow connecting a printer. I looked on Netgear website- looks like new specs for V2 are on there, but still can't connect a printer. USB is for NAS only. Asus?? Any thoughts?
Great review Michael. This is my new go-to website.
![]()
Belshazer
November 08, 2010 at 8:02am
I posted this on the earlier review but I intended to post it here. Sorry about the mistake.
I don't know if it is due to an upgrade in the firm ware, but I just bought one of these a couple of weeks ago and I have 2 NTFS drives connected through a USB hub attached to the USB port on this router and I don't have any problems reading and writing to them.
![]()
MrMick
November 03, 2010 at 9:36am
In case you're wondering when Netgear plans to ship the WNDR3700 V2: When I was writing this article for the print edition of Maximum PC, I was told it would ship in mid to late September. Now Netgear is telling me "within the next few months," but they won't be more specific than that.
![]()
Shatter242
December 02, 2010 at 2:57pm
Looking in stores and on the Netgear site, they have the WNDR3700 and the WNDR37AV. Reading the box closely they are both a N600 router, have essentially all of the same specs, and the routers themselves look exactly the same.
Is the 37AV the V2? Is there different firmware? I've looked around the web and on netgear site. Netgear has different pages for each, but still, they sound the same.
Also, retail they are side by side for the same price each ($159 Fry's)
Thanks
![]()
GiantKees79
November 26, 2010 at 9:36am
I just noticed that if you navigate to the WNDR3700 on Netgear's website and look at the specs, it now shows the flash as 16MB instead of 8. I tried ordering the router from Netgear's website, but it said that they were "out of stock," so I decided to let it backorder. Does this mean that the new routers that will be shipping are V2?
![]()
sumo
November 07, 2010 at 5:12pm
hi,
thanks for a very helpful article. do you know when the V2 comes out if it will clearly be marked as the WNDR3700 V2 or will they keep the model name WNDR3700 and start shipping the new models?
![]()
Aussie
November 01, 2010 at 10:04am
All,
With respect to: "We suspect the primary reason the WNDR3700’s press-time street price was so low is because Netgear was clearing inventory to make way for the WNDR3700 V2."
Does anyone have any information as to when the V2 release may occur? I would be really annoyed to buy the V1 and have the V2 come out soon after ...
![]()
win7fanboi
October 28, 2010 at 6:34am
Very weak on actual information. Agree with Pokey, there should be IPv6 info in specs along with any available info on firmware updates that will give the routers IPv6 compatiblity.
![]()
Pokey
October 27, 2010 at 4:50pm
Since Windows 7 uses IPv6 for HomeGroups, could we get a list/box that says whether the routers (these or any others reviewed) support native IPv6? I ask since my current router, D-Link DGL-4300, doesn't support routing IPv6 (unless it is encapsulated in IPv4 packets), and thus I can't group my two, working on three, Windows 7 computers together.
![]()
YoshiHNS
October 27, 2010 at 3:09pm
So basically, the only two good top-tier routers (that I am aware of) to come out since wireless N came about are the WNDR3700 and the WRT600N.
![]()
Eoraptor
October 28, 2010 at 10:12am
Yeah, it's really kind of sad that one of the best Wireless N/gigabit routers out there hasn't been made in over two years and still sells like hotcakes any time one shows up on Ebay?
![]()
xpose
October 27, 2010 at 3:09pm
This may sound ridiculous, but are there differences in speed when connected via ethernet? Or are wired speeds always the same?
![]()
Pokey
October 27, 2010 at 4:51pm
Most routers now have a 4-port 1 Gb switch included, some have more ports.
![]()
Danthrax66
October 27, 2010 at 2:39pm
Before anyone goes out and buys a new router first try flashing either DD-WRT or Open-WRT they offer way more features and improved range. Also never buy a router that isn't dd-wrt compatible because it will seriously limit it's usefullness in the future.
![]()
TechLarry
October 27, 2010 at 1:11pm
But since DLink managed to break just about every one of them with faulty firmware updates, and refused forever to admit to the problem (I'm not even sure they do now), I won't recommend them any more.
I never thought I would utter the word Netgear in this house ever again, but I've had a WNDR-3700 V1 in use since the week they came out. I bought one as a sanity rescue from my bricked DGL-4500.
It's been flawless.
![]()
Mibgranny
October 27, 2010 at 11:49am
I'm looking at upgrading my router. It's a DIR-615, and it's really not that great.
I don't want to spend too much, so what's everyone's opinion?
![]()
chillyb
November 20, 2010 at 11:12pm
Will a "G" work for you, or looking at a "N" router? I'm still smurfing away via my Buffalo AirStaton WHR G125, but am looking for a reliable N router and have been researching/waiting for awhile now. I'm leaning towards either a Trendnet, Netgear or another Buffalo router. I never thought much about TN's until reading MxPC's reviews. (and ad's) And was ready to buy the 691/3?, until the ratings a few months ago. Before I bought the Buff, I purchased a Dlink & a Netgear from BB. *late 2008-early 2009*
But I took them both back almost immediately. (dlink just felt cheap, and the netgear wasn't that much better imho) So I'm reluctant to spend another $100+ on either one, even though these tests should reassure me. (linksys/cisco biased for some odd reason) ;)
Maybe I'll wait for V2, or just go with one of the ones listed here @ Newegg's "Best Rated" list. Good luck!
![]()
aviaggio
October 27, 2010 at 4:59pm
I have a DIR-615 and it works fine. What don't you like about it? Granted it's certainly not top of the line, but it cost me all of $30 and it works.
![]()
bonus45
October 27, 2010 at 12:02pm
I've got the Netgear 3700 and it really rocks even with stock firmware. For cheap I think I'd go with the Asus rt-n12. It's so cheap that even if it died early it wouldn't be a big deal. I've never had very good luck with the Trendnets, but I've never bought one of their more expensive ones.
![]()
Mibgranny
October 27, 2010 at 12:27pm
Wow. The Netgear looks pretty amazing. I took a look at the Asus too, and it looks amazing for it's price. My only gripe is that it isn't dual-band. The Netgear is $140 on Amazon, it seems.
Decisions decisions...
![]()
spokenwordd
October 29, 2010 at 7:42am
If you mean the Netgeat 3700 it IS dual band, I own it. On top of that it's simutaneous dual band with gueat accounts on both bands. Awesome router...
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.


















