Right Place, Wrong Time: 9 Technologies Born Before Their Time
While it’s a fact that some lame-o ideas flat-out just won’t die, no matter how long in the tooth they are – VHS tapes, dial-up Internet and DRM, anyone? – the inverse is also true. Sometimes, truly groundbreaking ideas pop onto the scene long before the mainstream is ready to embrace it. Rather than praising the success stories, this article takes a look at the lesser known forefathers that made best sellers like the iPad and Hulu Plus possible. Grab a seat and raise a toast to these technologies born before their time; without them, modern life wouldn’t be as comfy and convenient as we know it.
Tablet PCs

Image credit: edibleapple.com
Let’s get started with the 800 lb. gorilla in the room: tablet computers. Contrary to what Apple would have consumers and the worldwide courts believe, tablets didn’t begin with the iPad. The concept has been around in pop culture for a long, long time – in fact, Samsung recently pointed to the appearance of a tablet in 2001: A Space Oddysey when Apple tried slapping the Galaxy Tab with an injunction request in the U.S. While it’s true that the iPad thrust tablets into the limelight, the Apple portable wouldn’t have even been created without the legion of unsuccessful tablets that came before it.
Plenty of people – including the group mind at Wikipedia – consider the Microsoft Tablet PCs that popped up in the early 1990s as the father of the tablet. Pfah! Tablet-like computers have been around much longer than that. As our evil twins at MacLife.com point out in their excellent “5 Tablet Blasts From the Past” article, Samsung’s GRiDpad popped up in 1989, and Apple itself failed with the Newton MessagePad before the iPad and the Apple Graphics Tablet (which interfered with radio signals and raised the FCC’s hackles) way back in 1979. Admittedly, the Graphics Tablet and the early 1980s Pencept tablets needed to be hooked up to a separate computer in order to work, but hey, it still kinda counts. Every tablet failed in varying degrees of spectacularness, however, until Steve Jobs hypnotized the world with the iPad in 2010.
Instant Boot

Image credit: hpmuseum.net
PCs that boot instantly are the holy grail of computing. Even if you think tablets are more of a novelty than a useful piece of hardware, you can’t deny that their speedy boot times are awesome. News flash: fast boots have been around a lot longer than iPad 2 and ASRock, n00bcakes. In fact, the oddly innovative HP Omnibook 300 sported even faster boot times than Apple’s flagship tablet way back in 1993.
How’d they do it? By keeping nearly everything – including Word, Excel, and the entire Windows 3.1 operating system – off of the hard drive and running it from ROM memory, instead. The nifty trick created a boot time that was really, truly damned near instantaneous. The 2.9 lb. portable PC packed in a couple of other interesting features, too; it contained a mouse that popped out of the notebook’s casing and, in a pinch, it could run on 4 AA batteries. Unfortunately, with a starting price of just a hair under $2000, the Omnibook 300 never really took off.
Batteries
These days, it’s difficult to remember a time without batteries. Sometimes, it seems like everything but the kitchen sink requires a two or ten of the expensive little electricity tubes in order to run. Thomas Edison was in the battery business way back in 1900, and Alessandro Volta invented the first real battery in 1800. But even though batteries seem to have caught on right away, some controversial archaeological evidence suggests that the first battery may have been created over 2,000 years ago in Mesopotamia.

Image credit: technology.am
Archaeologists have found a number of “Baghdad batteries” near – duh – Baghdad, Iraq. The terracotta jars have a hollow copper cylinder inside, which houses an iron rod in its center. A stopper at the top of the jar keeps the iron rod from contacting the copper, but it isn’t watertight; the copper tube can fill with liquid. This odd design led an archaeologist named Wilhelm Koenig to speculate in the 1940 that the ancient Mesopotamians used to fill the jars with lemon or grape juice to create an electrochemical reaction and electroplate gold on to silver objects.
After World War II, an American named William Gray whipped up some replicas and filled them with grape juice. Lo and behold, the Baghdad battery responded by spitting out 2 volts of energy. Other archaeologists dispute the theory and argue that the Baghdad batteries aren’t batteries at all, but were instead used to hold scrolls. We’re not scientists, but the idea of ancient Mesopotamians screwing around with electricity and rocking gold plated jewelry is just too juicy to give up on, so we’ll toss our hat in Koenig’s ring.
CDs/Digital Music
Remember the last time you rushed out to your local music store to pick up a hot new cassette tape by one of your favorite artists? Yeah, us either. The digital revolution has taken the music world by storm, leading to the meteoric rise of iTunes, Pandora, and the lawsuit-churning arm of the RIAA. Before that, the 1990s were ruled by gargantuan CD sales. None of it would have been possible without James Russell, who created the first digital-to-optical playback device way back in 1970 – and was promptly ignored by music companies.
Russell’s primitive CDs were photosensitive platters encoded with one micron-wide “bits” of binary data, which were read by a laser and converted into audible sounds by a computer. Russell and Battelle, his employer, began shopping the technology around to potential licensees in 1974, including recording industry giants Sony and Philips. They didn’t bite, but in 1979, the two companies began internal development of digital audio discs. Sounds familiar, eh? A little too familiar: in 1988, Optical Recordings Co. – which held the rights to Russell’s patents – received a $30 million infringement settlement from Sony and Philips. Unfortunately, Russell never saw a dime, but music lovers around the world still owe him their gratitude.
Image credit: The Seattle Times
Comments
Comments are closed on this article
![]()
polland
January 11, 2012 at 2:40am
Grab a seat and raise a toast to these technologies born before their time; without them, modern life wouldn’t be as comfy and convenient as we know it.Submit Sites
![]()
caterin
January 05, 2012 at 1:21am
While it’s a fact that some lame-o ideas flat-out just won’t die, no matter how long in the tooth they are – VHS tapes, dial-up Internet and DRM, anyone.Phlebotomy Training
![]()
enafull
October 01, 2011 at 5:52am
Maybe Engelbart had a strong pinky from: <A href="http://www.gameduce.com/game/2213/Taxi-Gone-Wild.html" rel="dofollow">taxi gone wild</A>
![]()
tenchymuyo2
September 30, 2011 at 5:16pm
The Sony MiniDisc player. I got one just before mp3 players starting coming to the forefront. I even bought a Pink Floyd: The Wall disc set. Using an optical cable, I could perfectly sync and link up with my LaserDisc player to copy music.
![]()
keyzs
October 02, 2011 at 8:40am
oh yeah.... the MDs... i had the MZ-R 30. the MD walkman with recording function... it was so cool then... Cheers!!
![]()
compro01
September 30, 2011 at 7:08am
Oh come on. Batman and Robin was a perfectly fine action-comedy IMO.
![]()
dwellman
September 29, 2011 at 7:11pm
I keep thinking how much linkedin, more so than Facebook reminds me of the old sixdegrees.com site from the mid 90's I guess it was 1997-ish. . .
I think Laserdisc deserves a mention, too.
![]()
Brad Chacos
September 30, 2011 at 5:29am
Laserdisc was actually on the short list. At the last minute, I cut it because there was already another digital/optical media entry, and I think the story of James Russell is fascinating.
![]()
RUSENSITIVESWEETNESS
September 30, 2011 at 3:31pm
Was his situation like that of Robert Kearns, only without the eventual legal victory?
![]()
thechipper
September 29, 2011 at 5:34pm
I think 3d gaming/tv should be added to that list, especially after the pitiful failure it saw in the early 90's.
![]()
cappomutato
September 29, 2011 at 4:49pm
Conflicting dates for streaming video. I think it should all be 2004.
![]()
MrHasselblad
September 29, 2011 at 4:28pm
My patented idea came some time ago; as a career professional photographer... Imagine if even only a majority of digital cameras made had the ability to swap out the sensor to upgrade? One could either end the unit away to have it done, send it to a type of maintenance facility, or under the right conditions - do it themselves.
Sure you can do just that item with a medium format camera; such as a Mayima, Phase One, or even a Hasselblad - to name but a few. But why are people paying several thousands of dollars for cameras only to have them become obsolete within just a few short years?
See me to borrow the patent idea and run with it. The company to do so first would then beome the new (long time) industry leader - practically overnight
![]()
thechipper
September 29, 2011 at 5:42pm
Think about it like this. Technology advances incredibly quickly and in many cases things become obsolete in a matter of months. Ideally all you would have to do to your tv is install a small upgrade so that it went from a crt to LCD or 60hz to 300hz. Likewise with a computer. If all you had to do was replace a processer that would be grand. But you can't just upgrade over and over. Eventually every component of your camera becomes dated and/or obsolete. Some slower than others(ie lenses/battery capacity) But for the most part every 2-3 years there is a pretty large leap in the overall technology itself.
![]()
MrHasselblad
September 30, 2011 at 5:53am
Well I partially agree with TheChipper; in that... How far could one expect to upgrade a camera that costs 200 or even as much as 2000. But all of the flagship models from Nikon, Canon, and Sony cold use this benefit of upgradeability in more than one (of each brand) of their models. For the full frame digital cameras not all that much has changed on the insides of the cameras - especially considering that a true professional actually prefers manual setting a majority of the time. Full frame lens options are actually almost identical to the lens' made decades ago - in some cases thirty years ago - although most have gotten somewhat lighter.
I sincerely think (and could also prove by the business stats numbers) that it would be well worth a try - and not much of a gamble at all. And if one can spare the size and weight of a heavier medium format body - that some systems are actually priced right at the point of the flagship models for both Canon and Nikon. Soon the consumer will have the option of going medium format for not much more than five thousand - and that will change the non-medium format market quite rapidly.
A few other notes about the probable future of upgradeable cameras... That in the near future there only wil be three different digital camera chip makers - that they'll all eventually become standardized. That also soon there will be only three lens brands, and perhaps even standard flash hotshoes, standard sharing batteries between certain makes, etc...
That manufacturers must also consider; whm really wants to pay 8-9 thousand for a camera boy that almost requires upgrading every few years - the body iitself cost less than 2k minus the sensor. It's sad that such numerous areas of electronics have become almost disposable technology
![]()
szore
September 30, 2011 at 11:55am
Also you are assuming that when they invent a new better 'chip' it will have a compatable interface with the camera. Also, switching those things in and out require a clean room, not greasy fingers.
![]()
MrHasselblad
October 01, 2011 at 5:25am
Outside of medium format cameras; most full frame digital cameras are standardized to a certain degree. for instance; even with literally all of the cameras made out there; you can count the number of image sensor manufacturers out there for a majority of all of the markets on one hand. Even the eighty plus percent of the lend market comes down to only four companies.
It could rather easily be adopted and done by the camera makers that produce the full frame models.
As for changinf out the sensor; as discusses before. One would have th eoption of sending the camera body in to the manufacturer for quick change over/conversion, or there could be more than quite the number os shops willing to effectively do it. One could technically (and easily) even do it themselves; not much harder than having an Intel 980 build.
Even the 50meg image sensor on my Hasselblad back is quite easy to completely remove. Have done it a few times without risking damage to the sensor costing over 10k.
![]()
Neufeldt2002
September 29, 2011 at 4:03pm
That Apple graphics tablet sure brings back memories of high school and Industrial Arts class.
![]()
mseyf
September 29, 2011 at 3:36pm
" Why the upper-right corner? Who knows? Maybe Engelbart had a strong pinky."
Maybe he was left handed?
![]()
Brad Chacos
September 29, 2011 at 4:12pm
A fine point that I admittedly never thought of, being a right-handed guy. I still prefer the mental image of a grey-haired scientists with a massive, throbbing, hulk-like pinkie finger, however.
![]()
patrickgdavis
October 02, 2011 at 2:25pm
I'm a lefty but I learned on my father's computers, and he was right handed so I was forced to mouse righty as well. The hidden advantage is that my dominant (left) hand is free to doodle and take notes; I was always amazed that mouses (mice?) weren't always on the left for right handers to have the same benefit, especially in the 70s with all that mind numbing peeking and poking and goto etc.
![]()
Vernak
September 29, 2011 at 4:19pm
Woah there, Brad. Maximum PC will have to register a .xxx domain if you keep that steamy talk going.
![]()
Brad Chacos
September 29, 2011 at 4:22pm
See? You inadventantly make a joke that could be taken as sexual and no one notices your silly grammatical errors. I'm going to have to remember that...
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.
















