Reining in the Router Rabble--Six 802.11n Routers Reviewed
The market is crammed with mainstream 802.11 routers—we'll help you find the best one
In our last router roundup, way back in November 2007, we wrote, “We’re months away from a final IEEE 802.11n standard.” We never imagined that months would stretch into nearly two years before that standards body would finally finish ironing out all the details. But now that the spec has been ratified, 802.11n routers abound—and their prices have dropped dramatically.
Back then, the average price of the 802.11n Draft 2.0 routers that we reviewed—all of which had single-band radios—was $130. The average street price of the six single-band 802.11n routers in this batch has dropped to less than half that. The even better news is that the cheapest router in this roundup also delivered the best real-world performance.
You’ll want to consider features as well as benchmark numbers, of course. If you have complex routing requirements, you’ll want a model with tweaker-friendly firmware. And if you rely on VoIP for telephone service, play online games, or stream video over your wireless network while downloading files using BitTorrent, you’ll want a router with robust quality-of-service features. One of the models we tested allows you to share a printer over your network; another boasts advanced parental-control features.
And then there’s the certification issue to consider: Each of the routers in this roundup implements features of the IEEE 802.11n standard, but not all of them carry the Wi-Fi Alliance’s 802.11n certification logo. We’ll go into more detail about this in our buyers guide.
Read on for our full review of six of the latest mainstream 802.11n routers on the market.
Buyers Guide
What to look for in a Wi-Fi router
Wi-Fi Alliance Certification
Any router with an “n” in its name is capable of delivering raw data rates of 300- to 450Mb/s, right? Wrong. The Wi-Fi Alliance awards 802.11n interoperability certification only to routers that support two or more spatial streams (each stream is capable of a raw data-transfer rate of 150Mb/s). Single-stream client adapters can be certified as 802.11n, but the Wi-Fi Alliance awards only 802.11a, 802.11b/g, or 802.11a/b/g certification to single-stream routers. Any product that previously qualified for 802.11n Draft 2.0 certification can be automatically certified to be in compliance with the final standard. When in doubt, check which logo appears on the box.
Switch Speed
Nearly every wireless router has an integrated switch for making hardwired Ethernet connections. You need to move upscale to get a gigabit switch, though; each of the devices in this roundup has WAN and LAN ports that are limited to 100Mb/s speeds. A narrow WAN port isn’t a big deal (even screaming-fast FiOS connections top out at 50Mb/s downstream), and you probably won’t miss a gigabit switch unless you’re running a NAS box or a server.
Quality of Service
Quality of service (QoS) refers to the router’s ability to assign different priorities to the various types of traffic moving over the network. Wi-Fi Multimedia (WMM) is a QoS baseline because the router must have it in order to be certified by the Wi-Fi Alliance. WMM is designed to prioritize network traffic passing through the router according to four criteria (provided the appropriate bits are embedded in the packets before they’re put on the network). Voice traffic receives the highest priority, followed closely by video traffic. Packets carrying a “best effort” flag come next, followed by packets identified as “background.”
Better routers include more robust QoS features. They might let you prioritize traffic by application (so that packets related to an online game are favored over BitTorrent downloads or web-browsing activity, for instance), or by IP or MAC address or Ethernet port (so that a specific device gets higher priority than anything else on the network).
Storage Option
An increasing number of routers support USB storage devices. Some models support true NAS (network-attached storage) functionality, so that computers on the network can access the drive just like any other storage device. Others provide access to the storage only through a built-in FTP server.
Printer Option
Some routers can function as a printer server, allowing you to share a single USB printer with every PC on your network. Support for multifunction printers is elusive, however; you can typically share the printer function over the network, but not the scanning or fax features.
Parental Controls
We’re not big fans of this feature (we believe it affords a false sense of security because kids will figure out how to circumvent it anyway), but parental controls do at least allow you to put temporary roadblocks in front of unsavory websites, and they make activities such as peer-to-peer file sharing more difficult to pull off.
Our Testing Methodology
We tested the routers in this story at Maximum PC Lab North, a 2,800 square-foot single-family home in a rural area of Northern California. Each router was paired with the vendor’s matching USB wireless client adapter plugged into a laptop client. The router was placed on a shelf in one of the bedrooms, and we used the freeware benchmark utility IPerf (with the Jperf Java front end) to measure TCP throughput between two end points, with the client end point placed at three locations inside the house and three outside it.
Trendnet's TEW-639GR single-band 802.11n router, reviewed in our Holiday 2009 issue, delivered the best throughput in four of our six test locations, so we used it as our basis for comparison.
We configured each router to operate in 802.11n-only mode (if that option was available). We used WPA2 security with AES encryption and enabled channel bonding. The home is located on a 10-acre parcel and is well isolated from any neighboring wireless networks that might be operating nearby. We retested Trendnet’s TEW-639GR single-band 802.11n router, which scored a solid 8 verdict in our review in the Holiday 2009 issue, and used it as our zero point. You’ll find a raft of additional details about our testing methodology and environment here.
Comments
Comments are closed on this article
![]()
GreenJelly
October 25, 2010 at 11:32am
What serious gamer users Wi-Fi for their internet access. We want fast response Giga-gyte switches... Everyone I know runs Cat 6, and Gigabyte eithernet. Few use Wi-Fi for notebooks and such, most find the lack of information when buying new switches frustrating.
Even My Friends who live in Apartments run Cat 6... Im tired of this, low latency, range and house construction dependant wi-fi routers. I look at Wi-Fi as a "Nice Option", certainly not as a requirement...
![]()
Keith E. Whisman
August 14, 2010 at 9:07pm
Shit, I went to Fry's electronics yesterday to purchase a Wireless N router and saw the TrendNet TEW-652BRP and I recognized the model name and number and remembered it from an MaximumPC article and that is why I purchased it. It was a review that was made 7months ago and didn't remember that it's a POS. Well it went together fine and easy enough and it seems to work great in my house so perhaps it got a little better with time, but then again I don't run around my house with my laptop. I just wanted to be able to have my laptop in my bedroom and use a wireless printer in the living room. I hope it'll work with a wireless printer.
![]()
guatemario
February 06, 2010 at 8:16am
What a coincidence! I need to buy a new router and was quite excited when I read the title of the article! I thought that I wouldn’t have to spend any more time reading reviews and shopping around and that this article would do my homework and point me in the right direction. What a disappointment!
I was expecting better performing routers to be reviewed. I would consider these routers for a network in my grandmothers house! Not in a house where MPC is read as soon as it arrives in the mail! Even my grandmother would have expected something better! What about NETGEAR’s WNDR3700-100NAS? And where was LINKSYS’s WRT610N which supposedly replaced the WRT600N which was discretely removed from the Best of the Best? And all the other comparables?Even my grandmother is weeping!
![]()
croman4872
January 21, 2010 at 12:51pm
this seems to be an ignored subject that obviously shouldn't be if one were to judge from all these comments..
![]()
COMMANDER_COOK
January 22, 2010 at 2:14am
I'm not sure Michael Brown even reads the comments, judging by his profile...
----------------------------------
Donate blood! http://www.redcrossblood.org/
![]()
CloudRider
January 20, 2010 at 6:08pm
So, is Maximum PC North a 2,800 SQUARE FOOT single family home? Cause a complex for 2,800 single families sounds like a pretty large demographic to serve with only one router.
![]()
thematejka
January 20, 2010 at 4:13pm
I must admit, this was a bit weak to, I bought a TP-Link router brand new from my local computer dealer for $70 MONTHS and MONTHS ago. It had the 2.0 Draft N standard, switch, (no usb), and it performed like MADNESS. I got signal from a few hundred feet away, and even in my shop, which is made of aluminum, I somehow got signal, I never got that from another router before. It's single band, and I am getting 96% of the internet speed I pay for, and even have very close to the pc to pc file transfer and streaming rates it promises on the box. I've never had a better router at a better price. Lets see some real routers here, I've seen most of these routers before.
Maybe there is a good reason they released a sub par article though? MaxPC is always good with their mag.
![]()
croman4872
January 20, 2010 at 3:05pm
this article really is pretty weak.. not really catering to the alleged target consumer demographic that the mag's name implies
![]()
AndySocial
January 20, 2010 at 1:06pm
I realize a lot of these articles online were originally in the magazine and get posted months later, but is this the most current info you could come up with? Linksys has at least three 802.11n routers newer than the WRT120N, for example - I'd have been interested in seeing how the 610 performs. Not too many readers of Maximum PC are likely to be interested in the older, less-capable routers listed here. No Gigabit ports? No dual-band? Not even discussion of the 2.4 vs 5 GHz bands? eh.
![]()
Morete
January 21, 2010 at 7:38am
I have the WRT610 $180 including tax, purchased at Fry's Electronics. It's been a year and a half since I bought it and it seems to work fine. It's a simultaneous dual-band router, which several other brands of dual-band routers are not (the bands have to be switched manually). The simultaneous dual-band routers automatically run 2.4 and 5.0 GHz constantly at the same time, depending on what applications are being used on the PC, like gaming or just web browsing for example. Most of the bandwidth designations can be configured in the Quality of Service settings.
Well, I have mixed reviews about the WRT610. Hard-wired connections to the router seem to be a bit more reliable at taking advantage of the full 5 GHz bandwidth. At first, I was using a D-Link 2.4 GHz wireless adapter for the non hard-wired PC, and I could never get the 5.0 GHz speed out of my router. I replaced the older D-Link card with a Linksys dual-band wireless card (single band card has one antenna, dual-band card has two antennas. Dual-band, 5 GHz card is required in order to be able to receive 5 GHz bandwidth), and now I am at 5 GHz speed on my wireless PC.
Router range is great for next room distances, but on another floor or on the other side of my apartment, my signal was decreased by 50%.
The Cd's that Linksys provides with their WRT610N router and their dual-band wireless card are not good in my opinion. The disks contain a lot of bloatware and are very buggy. It's best to download the drivers, etc. from the Linksys website.
This router seems to be okay for gaming, but at it's best configuration, ping is still higher than I'ld like it to be in games.
My next venture (when I can pony up the money), will be the new and improved DGL-4500 dual-band Xtreme N® Gaming Router with GameFuel technology from D-Link. The older version had some bad reviews, but this newer version seems to be getting some nice comments from other sites.
![]()
roninnder
January 20, 2010 at 2:25pm
I'd like to throw my hat in with the general consensus that these routers are weak. They are not maximum. Is this what we can expect now that Will is gone? This is an article about which cheap N router to buy for my parents network at best.
![]()
r00t3r
January 20, 2010 at 5:33pm
This article was just published in the latest issue. Most issues are finished 3months ago. Will was there at the time...
![]()
ksudeadeye
January 20, 2010 at 2:17pm
Completely agree.
I've been looking to replace my WRT54G (running Tomato) with a simultaneous dual band N router, and this article doesn't help at all. I need simultaneous dual band for legacy G devices and smaller portables (like my iPod Touch).
I also run a custom built NAS with gigabit ethernet, so a gigE switch would be nice. I don't know of a PC mobo that DOESN'T have integrated gigabit nowadays. I think the same is true for all the NAS kits from Buffalo, QNAP, Netgear, etc. I imagine a lot of MaxPC readers have similar needs.
It'd be nice to see a comprehensive review with units like these:
DLink DIR-825
Netgear WNDR3700
Linksys WRT610NPretty weak roundup. :(
![]()
COMMANDER_COOK
January 20, 2010 at 3:36pm
Copy that!
TEW-671BR!!!! (Although it lacks gigabit.)
----------------------------------
Donate blood! http://www.redcrossblood.org/
![]()
Trendecide
January 20, 2010 at 2:03pm
To clarify, this actually an article in the February 2010 issue. I've been anxiously waiting for a dual band router
article to replace the WRT350N I purchased based on the 9 verdict from
the November 2007 issue (I love it btw... had some overheating problems,
but modded a case fan onto the top of it powered via USB and added
dd-wrt... haven't had so much as a problem). Where's the review on the
Linksys 320N and 610N and all of Linksys' comparable competition? Even
better, we're using a Linksys WRVS4400N at work, how does it fare
against the others? How about a tie-in or follow-up article on dd-wrt,
how SP2 is coming along, differences between the versions, information
on all the settings, how to setup a hotspot with it, etc. For a
magazine that tags itself as "minimum BS", this article was full of it.
Extremely piss poor article!
![]()
Jubei
January 20, 2010 at 12:25pm
I love the D-Link 615! However, I purchased one a year ago (Jan 09) and it was hardware version C1! I think you guys should bee-bop down to your local office supply/computer shop/newegg, purchase and review the current model.
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.

















