How to Buy an SD Card for Your Digital Camera
Posted 08/04/09 at 12:00:00 AM by Gordon Mah Ung
There’s possibly nothing more confusing than trying to buy a new SDHC card. Do you buy Class 2 or Class 6. Do you care about the “X” rating and should you pay for spring for a premium card? Frankly, even geeks can get confused when faced with a selection of 14 different SDHC cards of varying sizes and ratings – none of which readily make sense. Fear not, we waded through the specs and grabbed a selection of cards for testing to see what really matters.

Classless Society
First up is the most confusing and possibly useless rating system I’ve seen in a while. You’ll recognize these on the face of the SDHC card with the typical Class 2, Class 4, or Class 6 designation. This is nothing more than a designation for what the minimum write speed is for a card. A Class 2 card guarantees a minimum write speed of at least 2MB/s. A Class 4 guarantees 4MB/s and Class 6 means writes of 6MB/s a second. The new Class 10 cards (which are not quite on the market yet) would support minimum writes of 10MB/s.
The class rating was created to help the camcorder makers shoot for a minimum speed for their AVCHD cams. The current AVCHD specs maxes out at H264 High-Profile at 24Mb/s. That pretty much makes anything beyond a Class 4 (4MB/s or 32Mb/s) overkill for any current AVCHD cam. In fact, many AVCHD cameras still haven’t even adopted the higher quality profiles and are still down at 17Mb/s bit rates -- something most Class 2 cards (16Mb/s) can support.
This is my primary problem (and Sandisk’s which has recently been going public with its displeasure over the Class rating). It doesn’t serve the primary audience of SD card users: still photographers. Since it’s pretty clear that anything above Class 4 is overkill for AVCHD, what about still photographers?
That’s where the X-rating or pure write speeds can make the difference between sitting there waiting for the light to stop blinking and getting the shot of a lifetime.
X-Rated
The X-rating is nothing more than a write-speed strangely based on the old read speed of CD-ROM drives. So, 1X is 150KB/s. A Class 2 card equals writes of 13x, a Class 4 equals 26x and Class 6 is 40x. Some manufacturers such as Sandisk, simply skip the X rating, and express write speed in the most plain language that nerds can understand: MB/s. The company’s Extreme III SDHC cards, for example, are rated at 30MB/s. Again, that’s the disconnect that will confuse buyers: a high-performance card that writes at 30MB/s will carry the same Class 6 designation as a card that writes at possibly only 6MB/s.
The Tests
For our tests, we obtained three 8GB Kingston SDHC cards each rated at either 2, 4 or 6. We also looked at a Class 6 Sandisk Extreme III 8GB card as well a Verbatim 16GB Premium Class 6 card that’s rated at 60x writes or roughly 9MB/s. Our first test involved using a Canon Rebel T1i to first shoot video at 1080P and 720P modes. The camera does not write to AVCHD, instead it writes H.264 in .MOV container files with a monotrack audio. It’s no surprise, but every card had no issues with the video mode.
For our still image tests, we had no such expectation. To maximize the file size, we shot at the highest rated ISO of the body (12800) and in RAW mode. We also shot with a fixed white-balance, shutter speed, aperture and with auto focus off. We shot until the camera’s buffer was full and then timed how long it took to write those nine 22.7MB files to the memory card.
The results were not exactly what we expected. First, on the predictable front – the Sandisk Extreme III premium pricing bought us premium performance. The Rebel T1i’s Digic IV CPU took but 10 seconds to write the roughly 159MB of data to the card. That’s half the time of the majority of the other cards here such as the 16GB Verbatim Class 6 card and the 8GB Kingston Class 6 card.
Now for the interesting part. The worst performance was not the Class 2-rated 8GB Kingston card, it was the Class 4-rated 8GB Kingston card. The lowly Class 2 Kingston card turned in the same write performance as the Class 6 8GB Kingston card and the 16GB Verbatim Class 6 card. That dog slow Class 4 8GB card though, took 30 seconds to clear the buffer. Woof.
Our second round of tests measured how long it takes to copy the file from the card to a backup device. For that, we used the highly rated and incredibly fast Nexto Extreme portable backup device that we reviewed in our September issue. To hopefully increase the performance of the Nexto Extreme even more, we removed the 5,400 RPM Fujitsu 160GB hard drive and installed a Corsair P256 256GB SSD. This SSD features write speeds in excess of 100MB/s. The test file was a single 4GB video file captured on the Rebel T1i.
The results were again quite interesting. For the most part, we saw very little difference between all five cards. The previously dog-slow Class 4 Kingston card was actually the fastest by a hair. The Sandisk Extreme III was a close second with the 16GB Verbatim and the Class 2 and Class 6 Kingston cards coming in next. The takeaway here is not to worry too much about reading from the cards as there seems to be fairly insignificant differences between them to care. Certainly, card readers can impact the but we’re not too worried about how long it takes you sitting at your desk to copy the photos.
A final test was performed with the slowest card and the fastest card using old equipment. We took a Canon PowerShot SD950 IS, set it to its highest ISO and shot continuous frames and measured how long it would take to record the images.
The Sandisk Extreme III could shoot 15 images at 1600 ISO in 31 seconds. That previously dog slow Class 4 Kingston card? Just 34 seconds. At lower ISOs of 100 with a resulting smaller file, it took the Sandisk Extreme III 17 seconds to shoot 25 images while the Class 4 Kingston took 21 seconds. The upshot is don’t pay for pricey performance cards if your camera can’t use it. It is no different than putting super unleaded into your Toyota Yaris – you’re just giving Exxon mo’ money.
| Kingston |
Kingston |
Kingston |
Sandisk Extreme III |
Verbatim Premium SDHC 60x |
|
| Capacity | 8GB | 8GB | 8GB | 8GB | 16GB |
| Class | 2 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| X-Rating | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 60x write/133x read |
| Speed Rating | n/a | n/a | n/a | 30MB/s | n/a |
| Time to Write 9 22.7MB RAW Files | 20 | 30 | 20 | 10 | 19 |
| Time to Copy 4GB.MOV file to Nexto Extreme w/ Corsair P256 |
4:08 | 3:47 | 4:09 | 3:49 | 3:57 |
Buying an SD Card for Video
If your primary focus is video for AVCHD you don’t need to pay for anything more than Class 4. Again, any Class 4 card will easily surpass a 32Mb/s write speed. Since AVCHD tops out at 24Mb/s, anything else is wasting your money. It’s better to have a bigger, slower card (but more than fast enough for your video camera), than a faster, smaller card for consumer AVCHD.
Buying an SD Card for Still Imaging
Buy what your camera can shoot or what you intend to upgrade to. It’s clear that the high performance Sandisk Extreme III SDHC is the king of the hill for performance and if you have a modern DSLR such as Canon’s Digital Rebel T1i or Nikon’s D5000 or even the older Nikon D90, paying for the fastest card you can afford will pay dividends in how fast you can shoot images, especially if you shoot in RAW mode.
However, that doesn’t mean everyone with a digital camera should pay the premium pricing for a high speed card. Our tests with the two-year old PowerShot SD950 SI bear this out: even the slowest card in the round up turned in reasonable performance compared to the premium card. Only those with the newest cameras with faster CPUs (or those with an eye toward soon getting one) need invest in premium cards. For those, a card in the 60x to 100x will find reasonable performance for the price.
Great review for buying a
Submitted by kyri on Fri, 11/20/2009 - 3:14pm
Great review for buying a secure digital high capacity card for your digital camera. Glad you clarified between classes and x-rating. That was very helpful!
Other formats?
Submitted by musicman172001 on Tue, 08/04/2009 - 7:04pm
Are there any plans to do similar testing with other memory card formats? In particular I'm interested in Compact Flash since it's another big one for still photography, especially in the higher-end models which rely on speed for professional shoots. At 4-6MB for JPGs and 25-30MB for RAW (and 30-40MB for the RAW+JPG mode) on my Canon 50D I'd love to know what the best option is for a memory card.
I think Gordon meant to say
Submitted by chaosdsm on Wed, 08/05/2009 - 3:45pm
I think Gordon meant to say Extreme III or Extreme IV cards, not Ultra III/IV which do not exist at this point in time.
You can see a comprehensive breakdown of EOS 50D / CF card performance here: http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/camera_multi_page.asp?cid=6007-9672 Along with many other cameras & SD cards as well.
Depending on your needs, full-time Pro, Semi-Pro(part timer), Serious Amateur, etc... you can choose the card that meets your speed & budget needs. If money is no object & performance is everything, or you're a full-time professional photographer, the choice is pretty clear, SanDisk Extreme Ducatti Edition & you get slower & cheaper from there...
Yup...
Submitted by gordonung on Wed, 08/05/2009 - 5:07pm
You're right. It was a little late when I posted that last night. Rob's CF database is great. It's a great way to see just how much the CPU is starting to matter in these cameras. The newer consumer cams outshoot the older "pro" bodies in write performance.
CF testing
Submitted by gordonung on Tue, 08/04/2009 - 11:13pm
It has been some time since we looked at CF but we may revisit it. The 50D's performance should be similar to the Rebel T1i since both are Digic IV based (albeit SD instead of CF). If you shoot JPEG, a card similar to an Ultra III
should be fine. If you shoot RAW, considering paying for a Sandisk Ultra IV - class card. The 50D should have a pretty deep buffer though so you I'm going to guess you can get by with a moderately fast card.
Class Ratings not in the best interest of the Consumer
Submitted by chaosdsm on Tue, 08/04/2009 - 3:50pm
Camera writes can be considerably slower than a given card is capable of achieving. Even the best pro level DSLR's can fall short of the best cards write speed capabilities. A more important aspect for some of us is the transfer rate from card to PC, especially for video where you may be copying up to 32GB of video to your PC, in which case a fast high end card can cut your transfer time in half vs some of the slower & cheaper cards.
I've never liked the "class rating" system of SD cards, especially since 80% of the manufacturers don't bother to list the cards maximum speeds, some don't even list them in their white-papers. It seems to go against the interests of the consumer. IMO, every memory card should be required to have the maximum read & write speeds listed in MB/sec, this would eliminate a lot of confusion & frustration.
Host to PC
Submitted by gordonung on Tue, 08/04/2009 - 11:16pm
Yes, I agree. If host to PC is important pay for that fast card. For this test thought, I was looking for a good balane between cost to performance. A lot of people find those cheap 16GB quite attractive.
And yes, I agree. Makers should list max write/read specs listed. One thing I didn't touch on was the lottery impact.
Some "slow" cards are faster than some of the fast cards and there is no rhyme or reason for it.
Thanks for this one. I'm
Submitted by Roykirk on Tue, 08/04/2009 - 2:14pm
Thanks for this one. I'm looking at getting the exact camera you used for testing, so I know which card I'm getting, without a doubt.
yea...thanks for this
Submitted by moko on Tue, 08/04/2009 - 10:24am
yea...thanks for this comparison,I have been wondering what the difference is with these different card speeds,thanks for the info
Excellent Info
Submitted by Stever on Tue, 08/04/2009 - 4:45am
Great comparo and excellent info provided. I've been very happy with the performance of the Sandisk Extreme III SDHC cards I'm using in my D40, especially when ripping off a sequence of shots. And, now that I'm looking into buying a video cam, it's good to know that bigger is better over speed.
Thanks!
Feature
Review
Feature
Feature
Feature






