Features
Click to see how we built a better monster
One is the bomb, two are bombastic
So much RAM your applications won’t know what to do with it
Our home-brewed cooling kit offers maximum performance and minimum noise
Next: GPUs, Sound, Optical, and Storage! >
Dream Machine '08
Posted 08/27/08 at 12:30:00 PM by The Maximum PC Staff
Comments
Print
Email
No Guts, No Glory
Click to see how we built a better monster
Processors: Two Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9775 CPU
One is the bomb, two are bombastic
Quad core? Nerd, puhlease—that’s so 2008. Next year will be all about CPUs with eight threads. Fortunately, we’re already there with a pair of Intel 3.2GHz Core 2 Extreme QX9775s. Between these most insane of Intel’s Core 2 chips, we get eight cores available to the operating system at a nice round 4GHz. Is that overkill? Perhaps, as you probably won’t find more than a couple dozen apps that will use all of these cores today. But let’s not forget multitasking—you know, like encoding an H.264 video in the background while playing a game and also compiling some code and running a few Folding@Home sessions. You can have all that and your cake, too, with the QX9775s. It’s even possible—dare we say it—that applications optimized for more than quad cores would benefit more from a pair of QX9775s than they would from Intel’s upcoming Nehalem. Time will tell.
Memory: 8GB Corsair FB-DIMM
So much RAM your applications won’t know what to do with it
Most consumers have never been exposed to “fully buffered” DIMMs, as the memory is strictly intended for workstations. To sum it up, it’s a hybrid of serial and parallel interfaces that uses an advanced memory buffer in the module to let machines run in excess of 128GB of RAM. The penalty is latency and tremendous heat from the AMB, so we had to use a Corsair Dominator fan to keep the modules from spontaneously igniting.
PSU: PC Power and Cooling Turbo Cool 1200
A true 1,200W PSU that makes a mockery of many ‘1,000-watt’ units
Most 1,000-watt PSUs would crumple under the strain of our Dream Machine’s loadout, so we turned to our old standby: PC Power and Cooling. Its custom-wired Turbo Cool 1200 gives us more than enough power to run all of our hardware, and with the PC Power and Cooling name behind it, we know the unit won’t quit on us.
Motherboard: Intel D5400XS
The mother of all, um, motherboards
Intel’s original V8 S5000XVN motherboard was essentially a relabeled dual-Xeon board pitched as an enthusiast board, which it wasn’t. Intel took the lessons it learned from the V8 and created the much improved Skulltrail D5400XS board. Gone are the eight FB-DIMM slots and SAS features. In are CrossFire support, overclocking features, and a more traditional, more capable (for most folks) Intel ICH9R south bridge. The cherry on top is the D5400XS’s added support for SLI via the board’s two nForce 100 chips. That makes it the only platform that will run either CrossFire or SLI out of the box with public drivers. Awesome, right? It was until Nvidia decided to not support its latest generation of cards on Skulltrail. Why? It’s this damned war between Nvidia and Intel. And frankly, the situation sucks. If the parties involved ever get their heads out of their butts, the D5400XS will rightly take its place as the holy grail of platforms.
Cooling: A Custom Water-Cooling Extravaganza!
Our home-brewed cooling kit offers maximum performance and minimum noise
The dimensions of the Blackbird chassis limited our options for water cooling this year’s Dream Machine. We opted for a Black Ice Pro2 Xflow radiator, as it’s one of the slimmer two-fan radiators we’ve tested. The reservoir is the same model from last year’s Dream Machine, Danger Den’s single-bay tank.
The entire assembly is outfitted with half-inch tubing and fittings. A super-powerful DD12V-D5 pump ensures a speedy flow rate for our fluid, Feser One clear UV-reactive coolant. This, in addition to our two D-TEK FuZion v2 CPU blocks, ensures that the processors will stay well within a healthy thermal range as we push this machine to its outer limits. Two silent Enermax Everest 12cm fans maintain low coolant temperatures.
Next: GPUs, Sound, Optical, and Storage! >
How can it be the "Dream Machine"?
Submitted by johnsons0597 on Wed, 09/24/2008 - 8:07pm
If you are looking at pushing the edge, how can this year's dream machine be it? instead of a harddrive, you should've looked at www.fusionio.com Their IOdrive in 80,GB, 160GB and 320GB gives near RAM performance for non-volitile storage without the limitations on typical solid state drives. My SysAdmins are evaluating this product. So far, nothing can hold a candle to it.
just wondering...
Submitted by Reaper351 on Tue, 09/23/2008 - 3:30pm
<hr/>
first page here
Well, here we are again. The Dream Machine gets
pwned once more. By Digital Storm's Bench Mark Crusher, an off the shelf computer for half
the price. A simple quad core with the lowly NVIDIA video cards. Admit
it, you dropped the ball on the Dream Machine this year. I know you are
gonna say - well we STILL don't have the updated drivers for the video
cards (That's like saying: I have this Formula 1 Ferrari that's suppose
to run on race fuel, but all we have is diesel fuel for this test) ,
Crysis isn't a good game (you chose it as a bench mark) and the Digital
Storm didn't win EVERYTHING (It won 3 out of 6), but the point was to
build a machine that was second to none in ANY category. I don't know
about you, but if I'm gonna dream, I'm gonna make sure nothing even
comes close. Maybe next year you guys can let Digital Storm and
CyberPower build the next Dream Machine. It appears these guys can
dream just as good as you, but for half the price.>
Submitted by rjcouture1 on Fri, 09/12/2008 - 6:16am
Okay, I know the dave left but he had said earlier monday of that week before he left he was going to retube the dream machine to prove or disprove that it doesn't effect performance it's coming up on the second week is this something I'll read about in the magazine or has anybody even done it. Iknow you have more to worry about than this silly question but with conflicting veiws from you and d-tek I'd like to know.Is there any measusable temp difference and if so how much. also as a side note do you use the quad insert or do you feel there just a gimmick.
Sorry! Didn't have time to
Submitted by TheMurph on Fri, 09/26/2008 - 12:22am
Sorry! Didn't have time to tackle this before I left. And in my absence, I don't think any other editor wants to fuss around with water cooling tubes. This question will have to remain unanswered... for now. Perhaps I'll get to revisit it sometime in the future.
Submitted by rjcouture1 on Fri, 09/26/2008 - 4:28pm
I know I seem like a hound for answers.
I hope at some point they can test this on any system to see if there is or isn't a difference as I think it poses some interesting questions into why they mark there blocks in/out.
such as
Does it impede flow?
When filling does it introduce a longer air removal time?
Is there any effect on tempurature?
What happens if someone uses the quad mid-block insert and misinstalls?
these are some of the questions that come to mind.
So thank you for your reply and I hope at somepoint someone can answer these questions.
can the dream machine really kick my ass???
Submitted by mojosico on Sun, 09/07/2008 - 4:08pm
hey i was thinking that you guys dont use the DM for regular test right? so i think it would be cool if you guys could find it in your hearts to give mojo the DM 08 . oh and for the desktop theme it could be a pic of norm chan licking the DM 08 . NOW THAT WOULD BE KICK ASS . In a totally straight way of course . has anyone noticed all the gay undertones lately on the podcast and on the web site ? im not saying anything , but it is a little strange . oh yeah DM 08 + my house =totally frickin awsome times at mojo's house . ON MY GRAVE STONE I WOULD READ . IN 2008 MAXIMUM PC TOTALY KICKED MY ASS!! WITH THE DREAM MACHINE 2008. or here lies mojo mad at the world cause maximum pc dissed mojo and did not give him the dream machine 2008. you have the choice in your hands .
MOJOSICO
Mojo, That noise you just
Submitted by sirphunkee on Sun, 09/07/2008 - 4:54pm
Mojo,
That noise you just heard was the needle skipping across the vinyl as the music suddenly stopped and everybody turned to stare at you
Submitted by scurvy on Tue, 09/02/2008 - 9:25am
Guru 3D made the ultimate Dream Machine. See how it runs.
http://www.guru3d.com/article/geforce-gtx-280-sli-triple-review-test/10
Look, I know the dream
Submitted by n0t_a_n000b on Tue, 09/02/2008 - 8:02am
Look, I know the dream machine sucked on Crysis and all, but can you guys re-benchmark it on the games? Please? I want to know how it compares to dual or tri SLI (280 GTX), or just how but kicking it is.
N0t a n00b
I would have used an
Submitted by Stephenh1984 on Mon, 09/01/2008 - 10:03am
i would have used an asus striker II extreme motherboard and three 280gtx's
and why didn't you liquid cool the grapics cards
liquid cooled graphics
Submitted by EthicSlave on Mon, 09/01/2008 - 4:09pm
I think they thought it best not to try and overclock/fry their beta pre-release version ATI cards. This is what liquid cooling is best used for, is it not? Although I'm no MPC staff so best to wait and see what an "official team member" says.
As for the asus striker II extreme... this would leave how many processing cores? 4?
Submitted by Stephenh1984 on Fri, 09/05/2008 - 3:57pm
well i cant think of any unless u would like to multitask
Submitted by EthicSlave on Fri, 09/05/2008 - 8:27pm
I can't think of any uses but 2 for triple sli gtx 280's.
One is support for future games (hmm sounds like 8 cores would do this), and second run crysis respectively @ high res with everthing turned on (which requires a powerful cpu to begin with or you run into problems with the graphics pushing more than the cpu can handle and u have framerate losses similar to just having a dual sli setup). So spend that $ wisely.
Submitted by Stephenh1984 on Tue, 09/09/2008 - 4:30pm
their is a review on newegg of the cpu they used, where they cooled with dry ice and overclocked it to 9.4Ghz and he could run on very high with 350 fps, so you could always do that and still get you 280s. also why are the 200 series not supported with skulltrail, which sucks
I saw that review! The
Submitted by n0t_a_n00b2 on Sun, 12/21/2008 - 7:49am
I saw that review! The only thing was the guy said his dry ice melted and his CPU got, you know, toasted like a spaceship on Venus.
Dream machine 2008 vs Crysis
Submitted by ghot on Sun, 08/31/2008 - 10:22pm
Dream machine 2008 is no doubt a nice rig.....but $17,000 for a rig that can't beat your Q6xx zero point rig in Crysis is just plain sad. The people who buy high end ethusiast rigs are "generally" gamers.....26fps is Crysis....something is wrong there folks. It IS pretty though :) I run a AMD 5000+ OC'd to 3.2Ghz, with a SINGLE GTX 280 and I can get better Crysis frame rates than that....even on high settings.
Submitted by pseizure2000 on Tue, 09/02/2008 - 4:28am
well, like they said, they were using a card before it was even released so the drivers hadn't been optimized for crysis at that point. That said, with driver updates the scores are probably much higher now.
Nice benchmarks but i want to see...
Submitted by Devo85x on Sat, 08/30/2008 - 7:30am
Those are nice benchmarks but i rly want to see a dream machine with gaming in mind... PLZ GIVE US A MACHINE WITH GOOD GAMING FRAMERATES!!!
Submitted by AlaskaDrew on Sat, 08/30/2008 - 4:09am
DM 2008 is a nice but I would have done it a little different. If you want 600 Gigs of fast storage I think five 120 Gig SSDs would have been a better choice. Also, I would have used one OC'd 9770 and three OC'd Water cooled GTX 280's in SLI. Isn't it best to use faster unbufferd ram if your not using it in a server? Wouldn't 8 gigs of the fastest current DDR 3 be better? At least then you could use the ram in your next upgrade if you want. I am no expert but I think if your going to blow that much on a case you should have the fastest possible hardware configuration witch I don't think DM08 is. Give me an ultra fast computer in a big roomy case painted with a few economy sized cans of black spray paint. Of couse MY dream is speed not being crash proof and good looking. This is all IMHO as I am not an expert.
Submitted by rjcouture1 on Thu, 08/28/2008 - 10:11pm
Anybody that has the magazine look at the page with the machine guts trace the watercooling lines, see anything wrong ? look up d-tek fuzion v2 block , how bout now? either the pumps being fed hot water a pump no no or the tubings installed wrong.I believe the wrong picture got put in the mag but still I mean I didn't realize it myself at first quick read through the first time.
Submitted by TheMurph on Fri, 08/29/2008 - 9:46am
Spoiler: it doesn't matter which connector of the waterblock you attach to.
Our loop is thus: Pump > CPU #1 > CPU #2 > Radiator > Reservoir > Pump
Submitted by rjcouture1 on Fri, 08/29/2008 - 3:22pm
Then why do they stamp in / out on the top peace why do the have the inside copper base designed the way they do? I looked up these blocks on several review sites looking for a good cpu block the explained why the pins are in the center or installing the optional quad core insert which goes in the center it hits the center to get turbulance and get the most heat tranfered to the coolant the side fins reduce that turbulance to almost nil on exit,which is why I got the fluid XP+ vortex clone similar design where your flow asumption wouldn't matter is a themaltake acrylic top waterblock thats just a wavy line.I mean you guys are the first to complain about another cases detailed insides well I see a problem installing that paticular water block like that your reducing it's performance in cooling maybe not a great deal there's no way to make a comparison you don't give your idle or load temps for the system and there are no other sites that I know of that built the same rig the way I see it should have done.
Took a little while but heres a clip strait from there instruction manual Spoiler does matter
When setting up your cooling system and running the tubing, ensure that your setup allows the water flow to enter the block from the barb marked “In” on the top of the FuZion block otherwise you will see degraded cooling performance.
Submitted by TheMurph on Fri, 08/29/2008 - 11:03pm
Look at a picture of the inside of the waterblock:
http://images.bit-tech.net/content_images/2008/05/dtek-fuzion-2-waterblock/dtek-10.jpg
You are going to find a very similar amount of turbulence whether you splash the water directly over the center or slightly off to the side. And even if I'm completely wrong, you'd be talking about a minor, if not imperceptible difference in temperature. Our fast-flowing coolant is going to hit all parts of that waterblock's internals whether it's directly over the top or otherwise.
Submitted by rjcouture1 on Sat, 08/30/2008 - 7:40am
I'm no Scientist but when something hits basicly a wall "center insert" you've effected flow does the same happen with air sure it does,on the same note when you write a review do you do it with a typewriter and then scan it to a computer no because it effects your flow to get it done as quick as possible.
Now take yourself away from the DM08 project say that the case came in for review your telling me you would not ding that case points for the way the water cooling was set up,I for one have read over the years how thorough you guys are on dell,cyberpower,polywell,and on.
And last I e-mailed D-tek heck the dog would and heres part of what they said, "just got done examining how they hooked it up and you are 100% correct that it is wrong. I never even noticed :)
There would be a substantial performance difference not running it in the correct flow orientation." Woof.
Submitted by TheMurph on Sun, 08/31/2008 - 9:36pm
I will be happy to retube the Dream Machine over the next week to show the ultimate difference (or lack thereof) of the connections. I think this presents an interesting question, given the length our discussions have taken.
Submitted by rjcouture1 on Mon, 09/08/2008 - 7:47pm
I don't mean to be a bother but it is my belief that I was told something to shut me up.
I know that you have a publication to run but to be told something the beginning of last week by Mr. Murphy knowing he was not going to be there by the end of the week is just poor I waited the whole week for something that could be worked on in a few hours knowing the busy schedule maximumpc has I did not expect results till the end of the week.
I would respect the results given,I must also say I have posted my thoughts on a website on this subject and these people are interested to know also your results maybe these people don't read your magizine,maybe they do all I know is there is an interest for them to know if it makes a difference.
I'm also assume you don't use the seperate d-tek v2 fusion quad core mid chamber.
Submitted by chronium on Thu, 08/28/2008 - 11:24am
I was curious as to the reason why they didn't include a SSD in the specs?
Submitted by EthicSlave on Fri, 08/29/2008 - 6:46pm
I too was curious as to why there wasn't an SSD included in this rig.
I have mailed one of the staff with a viable solution to this PROBLEM, and I am still awaiting a response so until then. I will just have to say that I beleive they think the RAID 0 velociraptors provide more than viable bandwidth and load times for current apps and games, and I think that they also beleive there is mere margin to hard drive performance and overall PC performance. However I would disagree, the near instant load/seek times a SSD can deliver, massive burst rates and sustained read/writes make them a POPULAR choice for something like a DREAM MACHINE!!! So I will null my comment that the TEAM doesnt think this would improve performance and state that the small size of these drives make them an uneasy choice for todays computing. I mean c'mon what are they gonna do install the OS and maybe 1 game on an SSD and use 2 velociraptors as the storage medium? That would make the massive 1TB and 1.5TB drive an obsolete choice for storage, and furthermore using 2 velociraptors or a RAID 5 setup with 3 of these drives just sound silly when they are going to be used just for storage. When cleary these drives are opted for gaming and power users!
Submitted by TheMurph on Fri, 08/29/2008 - 11:05pm
SSD drive are only speedy on read operations. Their write operations, especially sustained writes, lag far behind those of a common velociraptor drive, let alone a Velociraptor RAID. I'll post the numbers Tuesday.
Submitted by EthicSlave on Sun, 08/31/2008 - 2:34am
I think you may have to retract your statement. In all the benchmarks that I have reveiwed 2 well known DIY SSD's almost always saturate their sata and sata ii configurations for read/write and burst speeds. Perhaps we have researched/tested different SSD's. Maximum PC itself has reviewed 2 of these drives. The hyperdrive and the I-RAM. There are sata ii versions of these drives and when u channel 4 of these drives into 4 ports on a controller like the Adaptec RAID 5405 it will come close to saturating the 8x PCI-E 1.2GB/s with sata-ii 300MB/s at saturation into 4 ports down a 1.2GB/s pipeline. I still dont see how a velociraptor comes close to this when it can sustain a read/write that saturates each port. There's even a newer 5.25" proprietary version of the I-RAM that does not require a PCI slot. I'm thinking the SSD's you may be thinking of are FLASH memory SSD's. Which I beleive to be far inferior with exception of a few GB in size on some of these flash ssd drives.
Submitted by TheMurph on Sun, 08/31/2008 - 9:37pm
Wait for the November issue -- we show this write speed lapse quite clearly in our mega-roundup of seven current SSDs.
Submitted by EthicSlave on Sun, 08/31/2008 - 11:22pm
Hey isn't that a spoiler... SPOILER alert!
I sure hope theres a NON-volatile SSD reviewed!!! Preferably with SATA 3.0GB/s
~once again keep up the good work. :) ~mOo~
Submitted by dc10ten on Thu, 08/28/2008 - 8:14am
Could you guys get back with us on how the cards perform W/optimizations?
Say how does this machine
Submitted by Keith E. Whisman on Wed, 08/27/2008 - 9:11pm
Say how does this machine measure up to last years Dream Machine? I mean the Bench Marks. I think last year you guys used to quad core amd opterons.
Great build.
Submitted by ferds7 on Wed, 08/27/2008 - 2:11pm
Why wasn't XP 64 bit chosen?
I think they did it because
Submitted by chaos.13037 on Wed, 08/27/2008 - 7:35pm
I think they did it because 64 XP lacks driver support that 32 XP has. I think Will said it a couple of times on the podcast.
Submitted by ferds7 on Thu, 08/28/2008 - 4:00am
I see. Thanks for the reply. I'll have to go find that podcast. Maybe it will answer the many other questionable choices they made for me. Thanks again.
Submitted by chaos.13037 on Thu, 08/28/2008 - 1:20pm
Your welcome, although, I can't remember which podcast it was. I think he said it while answering a reader question if that helps.
Submitted by ferds7 on Thu, 08/28/2008 - 6:32pm
Hmm.. on the newest one it appears they were just talking about Vista 64 bit I think but I can see how XP 64 bit would have lots of driver issues.
Thanks again.
Submitted by n0t_a_n000b on Tue, 09/02/2008 - 8:09am
Your right, the Dream Machine sucks - when compared to the IBM Roadrunner. Otherwise, it has 4360 gigaflops of power. Sure the roadrunner has 1 000 000 gigaflops, but it cost waaaaaaay more and isn't half as sexy. Oh, and your gona have to win the lottery to even house the beast. (12 000 square feet)
N0t a n00b
As always, you gotta love the MPC Dream Machine.
Submitted by Wildebeast on Wed, 08/27/2008 - 11:45am
It's good to see what's a step or three beyond the best of the best, come together.
What's the deal with the 2.1 sound though? Seems a bit like saying "let's just go with the on-board audio," in the middle of a $16,000+ build...
I know ---these speakers better than individual pairs used in bigger sets. But, it does make it sound like all your talking about EAX support and "PC gaming is not dead," were less than completely serious.
I don't think think PC gaming is dead/dying.
I do think MS decided to push hardware innovation because gaming software was not pushing any... and now anything innovative in software is low budget, across all platforms, doesn't get made at all, or requires massive power hardware.
[I do so love my 5.1 sound...]
Submitted by sirphunkee on Wed, 08/27/2008 - 9:57am
Well the lesson I get from this article is that a pair of 4870 x2's, 2 of intel's fastest current quad cores, and 8GB ram won't run crysis any faster than a pair of 8800 gtx's, one q6700 and 2GB ram. Talk about diminishing returns..
But what you DIDN'T learn
Submitted by dedgar on Wed, 08/27/2008 - 10:22am
But what you DIDN'T learn sifphunkee, is that the supplied drivers were pre-beta. Wait until they are optimized for those cards and I would bet there is a significant gain.
Submitted by sirphunkee on Wed, 08/27/2008 - 12:04pm
I was aware of that...but when UT3 almost doubles it's fps, and crysis doesn't budge by a single frame, something's fishy. Even with pre-release drivers they should be posting better scores than the 0-point rig.
I second both comments from
Submitted by pcwizmtl on Wed, 08/27/2008 - 12:43pm
I second both comments from sirphunkee
Dream On Until Your Dreams Come True!!!
Submitted by joeyjr on Wed, 08/27/2008 - 9:08am
joeyjr
Great job you guys!!!
You are masters in the art of PC building!!!
I feel your pain over the hardware wars and wish eveybody would just get along. Every year I try to guess what parts will be put into the DM and I did pretty good this year, but I was still blown away. Now, I can't wait untill next year. LOL
Thanks!!!
It was way cool.
Submitted by Talcum X on Wed, 08/27/2008 - 8:29am
Waited with baded breath for that issue to come out to see all the goodies and the numbers. Even available to us MPC readers, I wont buy a case for $1K, as cool as it looks. I'm dreaming today of just being able to rebuild my current rig of 4 years.
***********
Every morning is the dawn of a new error.
Very cool!
Submitted by Haipyng on Wed, 08/27/2008 - 7:46am
It is certainly a Dream Machine! The chrome plating is reminicent of the old Cylon Centurion, or "Toasters". Too much bling for my tastes. I don't know whether to frag it or lick it ala Norm.
I would love to see another feature article comparing this year's Dream Machine to last year's. It would really give us a feel for what has changed technology wise. Maybe even another one with a round up of all Dream Machines past.
Thanks for the great article!
The whole enchilada!
Submitted by Sebastianem on Wed, 08/27/2008 - 8:29am
I always look forward to September for this reason. I have to agree with Haipyng, this is one bad ass beast and I would love to see a comparison (today's prices, performance) done with DM '08 and it predecessors.
There have been some detractors to the assemblage of parts for this years DM, however, as stated in the article, the DM is all about the performance of the machine as a whole, not as a glorified gaming console.
Makes me wonder what next year will bring...
Must Read Articles
Feature
Review
Feature
Feature
Feature
This Month's Issue
FEATURE How to Get FREE Programs, Services, Software & MoreFEATURE Digital Photo Printer RoundupHOW TOBuild a 3D CameraFEATUREDIY Arcade PCWHITE PAPERHow TRIM Works
Technology News
Computer Cooling Fans
Computer Cases
PC Game Controllers
PC Games
Computer Hardware
Headphones
MP3 Players
Stream Video
Computer Mouse
Monitors
Motherboards
NAS Storage
Networking
Laptop Computers
DVD Burner
Digital Cameras
Portable Storage
Computer Accessories
Smartphone
Antivirus Software
Sound Cards
Speakers
Computer Systems
Thumb Drives
Video Cameras
Video Card Reviews
Water Cooling
Gadgets
- Keyboards
© 2009 Future US, Inc. All Rights Reserved.