Does Not Compute: 10 PC Myths from Movies and Television
For over half a century, Hollywood has been making computers do whatever they damn well please. Routinely featured on television and in movies, supercomputers, desktop rigs and laptops—and in some cases, the people that use them—are all too often imbued with near-magical capabilities, painting a deceptive picture of what our beloved machines can and cannot do. Not sure of what tech-centric malarky we’re talking about? No problem: We’ve put together a list of our top ten Hollywood TV and Movie myths. We’re betting they’ll be just as familiar and irritating to you as they are to us.
A computer will blow up if there is a question it cannot answer.

According to Hollywood, computers are so delicate that when confronted with a question that they’re unable to answer, they’ll explode. No one in the history of film knew this better than William Shatner. During his run as Captain James T. Kirk, The Shat took out more malevolent computers, androids and evil A.I.s with a set of contradictory orders, paradoxes, and strings of illogical questions about love or the human condition than you can shake a Bat’leth at.
If computers were really that volatile, you wouldn’t be able to count the number of people who’d have been sent to an early grave over Microsoft Encarta’s disc-bound and web-enabled iterations coming up with bupkis back in the day. The same goes for Wolfram Alpha: I don’t recall seeing any mention of the dangers of posing a difficult question to their servers. In reality, computers don’t explode when they can’t answer your question or solve a problem. The worst that could happen is that your rig might freeze up, reboot or pony up with a Blue Screen of Death. Granted, in the case of the latter, many users might prefer to see an explosion, but sadly, it’s just not gonna happen.
Voice recognition software works every time - and flawlessly at that.

While voice recognition software has improved by leaps and bounds over the past decade, it still kind of sucks. Due to the many nuances of human speech such as varied dialects, inflection, and in some cases, speech impediments, many people can’t manage to dictate an email to Outlook, let alone verbally control computers with anything resembling precision or reliability.
Except, of course, in Hollywood. In 2001: a Space Odyssey, HAL can open the pod bay doors at Dave’s behest; Will Smith is able to carry on a meaningful conversation with VIKI in I, Robot; and in Bladerunner, Deckard is able to direct his home computer to manipulate a crime scene photo with nothing more than a few words. Riddle us this: When was the last time you mumbled orders into a microphone for GIMP or Photoshop to resize your vacations photos? Exactly. While modern supercomputers such as IBM’s Watson have the power to process voice commands with uncanny accuracy, consumer grade hardware of the sort you’re using to read this with just can’t hack it the way that Hollywood wants to convince us it can. It’s too bad too. We’re all kind of sick of typing.
Any image or video can be corrected, blown up and made crystal clear.

Speaking of Decker futzing with photos in Bladerunner, why is Hollywood obsessed with unrealistic portrayals of image manipulation? No matter how grainy a photo might be, how dark it was outside when a picture was taken, or how far away a photographer was from the subject matter, any image can be zoomed in on, enhanced and dolled up for use in court or to track down the bad guys out on the street.
Jim True-Frost’s Roland Pryzbylewski does it with Video in The Wire, and Bryan Brown gets his picture tinker on back in 1986 with FX. CSI? Don’t even get us started. The truth of the matter is that no matter how advanced the software, or how powerful a rig you’re cooking on, the extent of how legible an image can be made - and how big you can blow it up for viewing without making your eyes bleed - is very much dependant upon the quality of the original image that you’re working with. In other words, if you take a picture with a Cybershot D710, no amount of zoom and enhance is gonna make anything in that shot look like it was baked with a Sony a900.
You can use your PC to interact with alien hardware.

It’s the stuff of legends: In 1996, Jeff Goldblum and Will Smith embarked on a heroic mission to rendezvous with an alien mothership orbiting high above the earth. Once inside of the mothership, Goldblum and his trusty Apple Powerbook 5300 managed to upload a computer virus designed to disable the shields of all of the ships connected to the mothership’s network. This allowed military forces from around the globe to mount an assault against the alien invaders, saving humanity from extermination. And that folks, is why we celebrate Independence Day every fourth of July.
Not buying it? It’s OK, we didn’t either. While an alien invasion is plausible (and we’d like to take this opportunity to welcome our new alien overlords), we’re still not buying one bit of what they’re selling with that Powerbook. Independence Day was filmed back in 1996. 15 years later, a Windows box still can’t mount a Mac-formatted drive and read what’s on it without the help of a piece of software like MacDrive 7, let alone a mother ship. Also, how’d they transfer the files? Were the alien ships rocking serial or USB ports? We’re sure you’ll agree that alien technology and human-made hardware just don’t mix.
Gesture-based computing is the future.

In Minority Report, the officers of Washington’s PreCrime Unit trundle through images, maps and video data using a spatial operating system interface. With just a few decisive hand gestures and a set of mission-specific gloves, PreCrime officers were able to work through case files faster than poop moves through a goose. It all looks very high tech, and very plausible. As anyone with an Xbox Kinect, Playstation Move or a Nintendo Wii will tell you, the era of the gesture-based interface is upon us. Outside of game space and Hollywood’s portrayal of point-and-do computer wizardry, there’s also Oblong Industry’s g-speak spatial operating system to consider.
But does having technology like this in the here and now mean that it’ll replace the primary computer interface—a keyboard and mouse—that we’ve used for decades? Not bloody likely. As we've already mentioned, voice recognition software is still a little rough around the edges, and we’re years away from a viable technology that could replace a keyboard when it comes to the generation of written correspondence. No matter how cool it would be to flip through files with our fingers, it’s still hard to beat a scroll wheel for efficiency.